On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 07:32 +0300, Vasily Levchenko wrote:
Hi, folks.
Currently at Virtualbox has introduced UEFI support in 3.1 release.
But there is one issue with X server. When trying configure X with
-configure. Resulted xorg.conf.new looks right except missed Modes.
Observing code
On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 01:50 -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 10:33 +0200, Pekka Savola wrote:
Hi,
On my laptop, after F12 updates-testing update today, after reboot F
logo shows but then the screen goes dark and starts flickering between
various shades of dark
Which are the best Bugzilla components to register bugs against:
X11 driver ATI: xorg-x11-drv-ati
3D driver: mesa
DRM: kernel ???
Cheers
Terry
Where is the location of the DRM kernel module master git tree now ?
It used to be at:
On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 13:17 +0200, Pekka Savola wrote:
On Fri, 27 Nov 2009, Dave Airlie wrote:
Don't use radeonhd, the Fedora X team don't support it and never have.
I'm thinking it should reallyt be removed from the distro at this point
as it makes things worse rather than better. remove
On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 07:18 +, Alex Hudson wrote:
On 27/11/09 06:08, Dave Airlie wrote:
Don't use radeonhd, the Fedora X team don't support it and never have.
I'm thinking it should reallyt be removed from the distro at this point
as it makes things worse rather than better.
If you
On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 10:02 +0100, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
On Thursday 26 November 2009 23:14:09 Dave Airlie wrote:
On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 07:23 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 20:16 +, Terry Barnaby wrote:
On 11/26/2009 07:46 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Thu, Nov
On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 13:42 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 08:12:05 +1000,
Dave Airlie airl...@redhat.com wrote:
Why do you think 3D should be working in 2009 as opposed to any previous
years btw? I'm interested in the logic that leads to this point.
I think
On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 21:24 +0100, stefan riemens wrote:
Not that i'm unhappy about the way things are going forward (my intel
gfx are working great!), but gnome 3 isn't going to be much useful
without 3d support...
3D driver for r600 is 35,000 lines just the chipset specific code,
Another
On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 02:11 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 11/28/2009 02:13 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
We (Red Hat or Fedora) currently don't have access to any sort of
conformance suite for our GL though Intel and VMware have started at
least doing more and more regression test work lately
On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 17:02 -0600, Sir Gallantmon wrote:
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Rahul Sundaram
sunda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On 11/28/2009 03:26 AM, Felix Miata wrote:
3D requires more dead dinosaurs, coal and/or other sources
of
On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 20:16 +, Terry Barnaby wrote:
On 11/26/2009 07:46 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 17:09:14 +,
Terry Barnabyter...@beam.ltd.uk wrote:
I really want to help and get a stable release and present bug reports and
even fix them if I can. But,
Yes, some graphics boards I am sure work well, although 3D should really
be working on all cards in 2009 ...
But this is the point, there are a lot of different graphics boards, and
so a much wider scope for the testing is required here which requires more
users over more time with many
On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 07:23 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 20:16 +, Terry Barnaby wrote:
On 11/26/2009 07:46 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 17:09:14 +,
Terry Barnabyter...@beam.ltd.uk wrote:
I really want to help and get a stable release
On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 08:07 +0200, Pekka Savola wrote:
On Thu, 26 Nov 2009, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
I have not entered any bugzilla numbers as yet. I spent days with F11 and
previous releases diagnosing reporting and attempting to fix bugs. No
graphics updates were ever made available for F11
On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 13:03 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 17:31 +0800, Liang Suilong wrote:
After updating the package, compiz crashed and glxgears can not run.
However, KMS and plymouth can still run well.
Here is dmesg message that I grabbed:
On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 22:29 +1100, Bojan Smojver wrote:
On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 16:25 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Not true. I just want to avoid repetition and if the points you wanted
to make have already been made clearly here and elsewhere, just be
patient till the decision is made. In
On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 23:02 +, Bojan Smojver wrote:
Adam Williamson awilliam at redhat.com writes:
What would you suggest would be better
than escalating the issue at the first available opportunity to the
appropriate authority - FESco - which is exactly what's happened?
RH folks
On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 23:24 -0500, Mail Llists wrote:
Jeff et al are 100% correct - why this is even debated is unfathomable
to me.
Surely it is completely obvious that the default should be off. (as it
was and will be in f13+).
Why have we not got a revert fix to turn this back off in
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 17:27 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Michael Schwendt wrote:
If you know that you would _never_ be happy with a test-update becoming
a stable update, then either don't push such a test-update or unpush
it (manually or by relying on karma automatism).
That was my point!
KMS won't init on this kernel, -48 is building now.
I untagged -46 but it'll probably still end up in rawhide last night.
Dave.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On Sun, 2009-09-13 at 19:43 +0300, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
Deltarpm seems to be unable to generate correct rpms for deltarpms
generated from noarch rpms. The uncompressed payload is correct, but
the compressed xz payload is different.
To test, using Rawhide's deltarpm, try running
On Thu, 2009-09-10 at 21:27 +, Mark Wielaard wrote:
Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com writes:
This is my issue too. There is claim that it was tested, yet it wasn't
tested in the same place we require every other feature to be tested,
that being rawhide.
Although it obviously
On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 16:42 -0400, Casey Dahlin wrote:
On 08/06/2009 01:26 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 15:08 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
A few days back I ran into
http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/2009-July/001293.html
I am wondering, since we
On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 01:36 -0400, Ben Boeckel wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dave Airlie wrote:
On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 15:08 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
A few days back I ran into
http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/2009-July/001293.html
I am
On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 15:08 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
A few days back I ran into
http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/2009-July/001293.html
I am wondering, since we are already using KMS in most places in Fedora,
how far are we from achieving this by default in a Fedora release?
On Wed, 2009-07-15 at 10:01 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
I'm not sure how widely used asciidoc is around here. Both git and
tig use it to build their documentation and have been hit by bug
506953ยน. I think this bug may hit many other users of asciidoc as
well, making our current packages a
On Sun, 2009-06-28 at 20:20 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Seth Vidal wrote:
I think we have a handful of vocal opponents.
Where have you seen a hand with thousands of fingers? ;-)
luckily we don't have to implement every whim that the majority or
a vocal group yells about.
If you go
27 matches
Mail list logo
