On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 15:47 +0800, Steven James Drinnan wrote:
David why you are so upset? No need to get nasty. I simply posted a
message about my problems installing F12. I did not Hijack any thread
(see the subject name). I thought this was a public forum. I sent this
to the whole mailing
On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 08:29 +0800, Steven James Drinnan wrote:
In-reply-to: 1257111085.2314.154.ca...@adam.local.net
References: adf480660910311031h5889985by4fb8d4ac7f342...@mail.gmail.com
1257111085.2314.154.ca...@adam.local.net
Steven, please could you explain the relationship
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 22:25 -0400, Tony Nelson wrote:
On 09-10-28 18:24:49, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 06:17:31PM -0400, Tony Nelson wrote:
Sorry to bug developers, but I didn't get any bites from PPC
users on fedora-list.
Does Fedora PPC work or install on oldworld PCI
?
--
David WoodhouseOpen Source Technology Centre
david.woodho...@intel.com Intel Corporation
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
we
shouldn't let them _try_. It doesn't hurt Fedora at all, does it?
--
David WoodhouseOpen Source Technology Centre
david.woodho...@intel.com Intel Corporation
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https
skip a release, but not always). And those are mostly
headless, remote boxes.
If you want new stuff, run Fedora and do a fairly painless update
annually. If you want old stuff, run Centos and update less frequently.
I don't see any need for a middle ground.
--
David Woodhouse
://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1450335name=build.log
You know you can have access to a real box to test this on if you want
it, right? You don't have to do it all in koji and look at the build
logs.
--
David WoodhouseOpen Source Technology Centre
david.woodho
on context switch that wouldn't otherwise
have to be saved/restored.
--
David WoodhouseOpen Source Technology Centre
david.woodho...@intel.com Intel Corporation
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https
enough. But just closing the bug in our bugzilla as
'upstream' is rarely acceptable for a _real_ bug, IMHO.
--
David WoodhouseOpen Source Technology Centre
david.woodho...@intel.com Intel Corporation
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora
On Sun, 2006-03-12 at 18:34 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Why do you need a separate header/field/whatever ?
You *already* have this field - that's the GPG signature.
Assign weights to signing keys and you're done
Not always sufficient. Most of the time I want yum to prioritise, it's
when it
On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 09:32 +0100, Igor Jagec wrote:
Speaking about NM, are there any plans for supporting static IP addresses?
Doesn't NM work with static IP addresses? It obeys static IP addresses
in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth1 for me -- it confused me by
doing so a couple of
Roberto Ragusa m...@robertoragusa.it wrote:
Seth Vidal wrote:
And how do you define library? There's no reliable way to
distinguish them
from applications.
This is part of the problem. It would be nice to have all things which
are strictly libraries add a provides: Library
12 matches
Mail list logo
