On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 01:20:48PM -0500, Todd Volkert wrote:
It just makes me wonder if perhaps the ypbind package should depend on the
autofs package...
Clearly it shouldn't because it does not, in fact, depend on autofs.
It's quite possible to use nis on machines that don't use or need
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 12:05:15PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 10:51 AM, James Antill ja...@fedoraproject.org
wrote:
How do you plan on restarting firefox? Or you just planning to kill()
and get the user to restart?
Trying to send a close button event to the
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 09:43:17AM +0100, Ola Thoresen wrote:
On 27. okt. 2009 22:48, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 10:40:30PM +0100, Ola Thoresen wrote:
On 27. okt. 2009 21:10, Matthew Garrett wrote:
What hardware is this?
02:00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 02:06:45PM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
On 10/26/2009 01:34 PM, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
Steve Dickson ste...@redhat.com writes:
On 10/26/2009 12:06 PM, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
Unfortunately, this sounds like only. Is it out of the question to
make the client
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 03:13:32PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
My packaging survey turned up a interesting suggestion
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2009-May/msg01809.html
We don't currently have any guidelines covering this but considering the
Debian action to hot
