uot;restart".
Shut-down going to bed.
Or keep the updates,
till bedtime.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On 06/09/09 11:50, nodata wrote:
--snip--
>>
>
> Is the abrt data stored in bugzilla?
>
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ABRT
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On 06/09/09 11:17, nodata wrote:
--snip--
>>> check it at:
>>> http://raj-khalsa.blogspot.com/2009/09/bugzilla-desktop-client-first-phase.html
>>>
>>> Working on this project is my first experience into the world of Open
>>> Source. I'm very new to this field. So I'd appreciate your suggessions
>>>
On 01/09/09 16:53, Iain Arnell wrote:
Redistributable, no modification permitted
"Redistributable though no modification permitted"
?
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On 08/08/09 17:09, Mail Lists wrote:
--snip--
>>>
>>>
>> bash-4.0$ rpm -qa | grep thunderbird
>> thunderbird-3.0-2.3.beta2.fc11.x86_64
>> thunderbird-enigmail-0.96a-0.3.cvs20090521.fc11.x86_64
>>
>
> Doh me - its -lightning- that doesn't work - sorry - my enigmail is
> just fine (tho looks like y
On 08/08/09 17:03, Mail Lists wrote:
--snip--
> Since the mozilla builds do not provide x64 (which is a shame 64 bit
> are basically the baseline now with core 2) and the plugins are not 64
> bit I am not using them - but if you use the 32 bit mozilla tb and
> enigmail nightly from mozilla - they
On 08/08/09 12:53, Gregory Hosler wrote:
> Frank Murphy (Frankly3D) wrote:
>> On 08/08/09 12:37, Gregory Hosler wrote:
>
> The printer is attached to a windows box. At the time of running
> system-config-printer,
> the windows box is on.
>
> This used to work ju
On 08/08/09 12:39, Gregory Hosler wrote:
> Hi all,
>
Works fine for me.
Did you get TB from Mozilla?
I believe enigmail is setup fro the Fedora packaged version of TB,
which is on TB 3 Beta2
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/
On 08/08/09 12:37, Gregory Hosler wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I'm hoping that I have missed something somewhere.
>
Wrong-list:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> Network Printer
> Select WIndows/Samba printer
What's the printer attached to?
--
fedora-devel-list mail
Excellent, take a bow.
--
Regards, Frank
jabber | msn | skype: frankly3d
http://www.frankly3d.com
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On 02/08/09 11:02, Axel Thimm wrote:
>
> Do you have the URL of the blog? Thanks!
>
http://www.advogato.org/person/mjg59/
27 Jul 2009
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On 02/08/09 10:41, Axel Thimm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in order to debug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514918 I
> installed a rawhide kernel (2.6.31-0.112.rc4.git3.fc12). Unfortunately
> X flashes all the time which makes working graphically very difficult
> to impossible.
>
> But I need to
On 01/08/09 20:00, Axel Thimm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to test some features of the F12 kernel. Unfortunately rpm's
> format change stand in the way:
>
I update to F12 rpm, it pulled in 2 other pkgs
rpm-libs-4.7.1-1.fc12.x86_64
kernel-2.6.31-0.112.rc4.git3.fc12.x86_64
rpm-4.7.1-1.fc12.x86_64
kern
On 31/07/09 17:37, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 09:42 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
>
>> I think what is meant, it that the app is useless, without either
>> web\media input. Which the user should not have to do to take full
>> advantage of it.
>
On 31/07/09 09:37, Jan Chadima wrote:
- "Conrad Meyer" wrote:
--snip--
Maybe I do not understand your question. Now the srpm and noarch.rpm also<
20kB.
The build is normal koji build. User (or admin) run the program and then
program synchronize the local database of keys to the inte
Found: Merge review 2007
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226132
Bug: 2009
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507026
--
Regards, Frank
jabber | msn | skype: frankly3d
http://www.frankly3d.com
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redh
On 31/07/09 00:43, Doug Epling wrote:
--snip--
It is apparent from reading all these great howdy-dos to my post, that
there is a great difference of opinion on exactly what Fedora is.
#1 That's it in a nutshell, Fedora is different things to different people.
As I said, it will be interest
On 30/07/09 20:02, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
Hello,
So I recently updated F11 and was told I needed to log off for the
changes to take effect. When I click the yield type sign and select log
off, I get the dialog for shutdown, restart, hibernate, suspend... Just
a small suggestion, maybe I'm of
On 30/07/09 19:55, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:40:03 -0600, Nathanael wrote:
Wrong mailing-list.
it's being human, and I managed to be polite for once :)
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-li
On 30/07/09 19:40, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
Hello,
On an up to date F11 I'm seeing bizarre audio issues. Using Rhythmbox or
the main volume control in the panel, if I adjust the volume, and then
request the next song, my volume level is reset, and not necessarily
reset to the same value. For e
On 30/07/09 15:30, wde...@mikrotec.com wrote:
I am new to this list, and I am looking forward to hearing the discussion.
--snip--
Is Fedora really gaining that much ground with every bi-yearly release to
justify that pace?
There is talk, just talk at the moment, for and ELC:
Wiki: https://f
On 29/07/09 23:40, Bill McGonigle wrote:
On 07/29/2009 02:47 PM, Ville-Pekka Vainio wrote:
I'm not
sure how extensions written in Javascript/XUL would be installed.
There are rpmfusion packages for thunderbird extensions -
thunderbird-enigmail being one I use which puts its files in:
Mozilla
On 27/07/09 21:33, Peter Robinson wrote:
Hi All,
I'd like some thoughts, and some help so yes, I'm opening a can of worms :-)
A while a go jkatz put out a call about support for netbooks, and I
begun to step up and the idea behind Fedora Mini [1] was born before
being sidetracked by shiny t
On 28/07/09 23:42, Mat Booth wrote:
I'm fast becoming a one man Java SIG. :-/
As soon as I know how, will help you.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On 26/07/09 14:01, Farkas Levente wrote:
the question here why yum not upgrade openssl during the dvd update
process. it's another yum problem (and it's happened with 3 of my systems).
Did you have updates checked during upgrade from DVD?
--
Regards, Frank
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
On 20/07/09 08:37, 梁穗隆 wrote:
I download and install the latest rpm of chromium-3.0.195. But it fails
to start.
I hope the bug will be fixed soon.
Not a Fedora Package.
Maybe contact Google?
Regards,
Frank
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.
On 14/07/09 19:20, Richard June wrote:
> I use azureus, and if it's reasonably popular, I'll happily maintain the
> package. Is there information on whether or not people actually install these
> packages?
>
I use it. That's as far as it goes at the moment.
(keeps my ISP happy)
Is there anyway
On 14/07/09 18:33, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 14.07.2009, 13:26 -0400 schrieb Matthias Clasen:
>>> Anybody knows how to contact Tomáš Bžatek? Is he still working for Red
>>> Hat? I see he has a lot of open bugs (some of them are just getting
>>> closed by the bugzappers) without a
I don't know ruby.
But:
http://tinyurl.com/9m4wzr
is some ruby stuff to identify snippets of Code.
Any ruby knowing people willing to package it?
Regards,
Frank
--
jabber | msn | skype: frankly3d
http://www.frankly3d.com
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https:
On 12/07/09 03:35, David wrote:
>
> Would you please name "some very modern day applications that are
> written for the windows platform" that will run in a Linux current
> version of WINE? That will run under the currently available WINE in
> Fedora 11. Names and versions. _Real_ applications. T
On 11/07/09 10:41, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
>
> The x86_64 repo contains some multilib packages. If you don't specify
> the wanted architecture when installing, yum might install both 32- and
> 64-bit versions if available. Try adding the .x86_64 arch specifier,
> e.g. instead of
> # yum install foo
On 11/07/09 05:46, Richard June wrote:
> I'm interested, I have packaged for Livna, YellowDog, and ran my own
> repository that built for fedora, centos, yellowdog, and suse.
>
I think the plan was to send "Spot" an email ;)
Regards,
Frank
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@r
Take 5, take note of Spot's msg.
Regards,
Frank
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On 08/07/09 18:51, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Jon Ciesla (l...@jcomserv.net) said:
Is he not responding at axel.th...@atrpms.net?
>>> That's his bugzilla email addess, so that seems to be the case :-(
>>
>> What about i...@fedoraproject.org?
>
> i...@fp.o is not Axel. ath...@fp.o just goe
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2009-July/msg00014.html
Regards,
Frank
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On 07/07/09 09:24, drago01 wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
>> Is there any contingency plans in place,
>> for a worst case scenario if C#, is lost?
>> FesCo?
>> Legal?
>>
>> Is there any searchable parameter,
>> to wor
snipped>
Since I would only use this new HDD with my
> different computers running fedora I thought I could use a more
> modern file system like ext3 or ext4. This would allow me to have
> larger files (and also maybe better performance). However, I would
> like to have the extremely high usabili
On 05/07/09 07:20, Matej Cepl wrote:
> Jeroen van Meeuwen, Sun, 05 Jul 2009 01:30:46 +0200:
>
>
> The problem I have with this whole project is that nobody explained me
> well, why you folks interested in this don't join CentOS project? NIH?
>
> Matěj
>
Possibly because CentOS is not Fedora
On 02/07/09 13:47, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 07/02/2009 06:15 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
>
>> Is there a book group?
>> or what search parameter?
>> Tried yum info "Dive Into Python"
>
> # yum info diveintopython
>
> Since we have more than one book,
On 02/07/09 13:41, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
>> We ship books as packages?
>
> Yes and this is not even the first time. Dive Into Python has been in
> the repo for ages already.
>
> Rahul
>
Is there a book group?
or what search parameter?
Tried yum info "Dive Into Python"
Error: No matching P
On 01/07/09 17:38, Bill McGonigle wrote:
On 06/30/2009 06:23 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
The average home user turns his/her computer off when going to sleep, so
he/she reboots at least once per day.
Unless they are into torrents\limewire, then it's 24/7.
Their is quite a lot of normal users in
On 01/07/09 00:22, inode0 wrote:
So if the community agreed to these two changes, which seem reasonable
to me, then what? Well, I think at this point we hit the real wall in
this debate, but I really don't think we can avoid the subsequent
requests for more equal treatment by refusing to call G
On 30/06/09 03:41, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Another big issue is what -devel packages to ship. A KDE application
developer will have little to no use for GNOME -devel packages and
vice-versa. The old Developer spin had only the GNOME -devel stuff on it
(it didn't even ship KDE at all),
#1 A Poll
On 29/06/09 17:17, Mat Booth wrote:
As a software engineer, I am also interested in making Fedora the best
development distro out there (I do this by packaging Eclipse plug-ins)
and I think the formation of a SIG to look after development tools
That's why the sig should come first.
but I'
Any preference?
May I request that you gather a community and get some more progress
*before* creating yet another mailing list? We have enough dead or
almost dead mailing lists. Adding more isn't useful.
Rahul
Hopefully after seeing this, some may come on board.
If not, then "Build it a
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Development#Communication
with this in mind.
Have a ticket open for a new m-l.
devel-apps@ or programming-sig@
Any preference?
Frank
--
jabber | msn | skype: frankly3d
http://www.frankly3d.com
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Development
--
fedora-devel
On 29/06/09 09:42, King InuYasha wrote:
I don't think you need to really worry about Mono itself. If you really
are worried about Microsoft suing your brains out, just remove mono-web
and mono-winforms. You don't even need those two for most packaged Mono
apps on Linux. Only if you want to run
Is there any contingency plans in place,
for a worst case scenario if C#, is lost?
FesCo?
Legal?
Is there any searchable parameter,
to work out what something is coded in\depending on (code wise)
This is not the normal " mono" post.
I hope, I worded it enough, that my concern is:
Fedora and
On 24/06/09 13:30, TK009 wrote:
Remember that ultimately Fedora _does_ grant you access to that level of
control, should you choose to use it: rpm -e --nodeps is available and
does what it says on the tin. The trade-off is you get the
responsibility along with the power. :)
Good idea
As th
On 22/06/09 08:32, Jesse Keating wrote:
Maybe, freeze all updates nearing a GA,
And keep them frozen indefinitely?
--
Jes
Duh!, forgot the coffee.
That would get the early adopters,
then nearing EOL of current eg 9.
Only allow updates for 11.
Same when 10 is EOL.
Just update most recent
On 22/06/09 08:24, Jesse Keating wrote:
That's messed up. We used to check just before release time that this
situation never occured. It should probably be added to the rel-eng
release checklist if it isn't there already.
Dave
Not possible while we allow people to keep making updates t
On 21/06/09 12:59, Martin Sourada wrote:
I'm not sure about most of these, but I'd like to note that
wpa-supplicant is not a wireless-only tool (that one of your sentences
seem to imply). I use it at dorm to authenticate to wired network(as
well as at home to authenticate to home wifi network).
On 21/06/09 12:57, Michal Schmidt wrote:
Someone already requested this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480558
Good
Why does it bother you? The package is not that big.
It's not about size, it's about making sense.
No wireless, therefore why wireless installed.
Michal
F
Why does yum erase wireless-tools want to:
Removing for dependencies:
anaconda
firstboot
rhpl
system-config-(boot,date,date-docs,firewall,
firewall-tui,keyboard,kickstart,language,lvm,
network,network-tui,rootpassword,users,users-docs)
This is a wired desktop, that has absolutely no need for wire
I've had no further replies to:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-June/msg00036.html
So can I take it nobody minds if I add my name to the sig
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Development#Participants
and try get this going again?
Frank
--
jabber | msn | skype: frankly3
Can this be stopped.
It is not helping.
Please
Frank
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On 18/06/09 04:09, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
I was more asking if there were perl packagers interested in
packaging/maintaining those packages. I can probibly find time to do it
sometime, but I thought someone else might be more quickly able to do
so. ;)
Thanks.
kevin
Would it be any benefit t
On 17/06/09 10:17, Paul Howarth wrote:
Supposing I have a bunch of boxes I want to install, most of which have
DVD drives but a few are CD only. My "preferred method" would be to
install via DVD but I'd still like a CD install method for the other boxes.
Paul.
If networked do a net-install.
We've seen arguments, for and against.
Statistics and Numbers, thinking!
Get the community involved.
*Find Out*
As I've stated earlier:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-June/msg01015.html
Run a poll, get the fp.o to run a poll, and blog\twitter etc.
*Don't ask pointed que
On 16/06/09 18:30, Seth Vidal wrote:
okay. chill out, everyone.
There's more than enough demagoguery to go around.
-sv
+10
Take the night off everyone, before hitting reply.
Been there, done that
Frank
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.c
On 16/06/09 04:56, Matt Domsch wrote:
with a BIOS a little over 5 years old. Is it long in the tooth? sure. Is it
still very functional? you bet.
I wouldn't go so far as to require sse2 in such a move.
I would have to agree with Matt on this.
I have put fedora on boxes for people with
On 15/06/09 19:02, Ingvar Hagelund wrote:
As one of many, I'm the semi-happy owner of an Apple iPhone. The iPhone and the
iPod Touch's media player db is well supported under Linux, using tools like
libgpod, and iFuse or sshfs for access. Until recently, one could use amarok as
a front end to
On 15/06/09 18:58, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Jon Ciesla (l...@jcomserv.net) said:
PLEASE do not do this.
If we stop supporting Pentium II and Pentium III, I have to buy a whole
lot of new hardware. Dead serious.
Could we do i686 as a secondary arch, and swap with i386 further in the
future?
W
Thanks Lennart, I really wish Skype would update their crap
Did you contact them?
Frank
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On 15/06/09 01:34, Lennart Poettering wrote:
what will smolt claim next? that santa claus exists?
You mean he doesn't :(
Frank
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On 15/06/09 01:24, Guido Grazioli wrote:
That said, I agree the wheel group should be enabled with sudo, though
I disagree that the initial install user should be automatically added
to it.
But then again, I hate sudo :P I do most scripting that requires root
access via root
On 15/06/09 08:15, G.Wolfe Woodbury wrote:
I'm providing severl friends and relatives with CD install images via
these genned iso's. So at least 5 more CD sets would have been fetched
if I didn't do this.
What was the underlying reason for the CDS' over DVD\LiveCD?
Frank
--
fedora-devel-li
On 14/06/09 16:07, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
However I agree with you that samba is always a pain to setup on new
systems. I do not hate it, but I wish this had been made easier.
Logging into X as root? I can't comment on this as I didn't ever feel
the need to do that. I didn't know it was prevented
On 14/06/09 12:10, Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
To be honest, I like the Ubuntu way of adding a sudoers entry for the
first user that gets created.
Then suggest it as a feature for F12
Frank
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fed
On 14/06/09 04:47, Jesse Keating wrote:
Don't be clouded by who is requesting it. Releng qa anaconda et al
would love to stop doing split cds. Less confusion on what to download
would be appreciated by many too. We are one of the last distros to
still do cd media outside of live media. Is this a
On 13/06/09 19:53, Robert 'Bob' Jensen wrote:
----- "Frank Murphy" wrote:
Just curious.
But if a user has bandwidth problems,
how is\are mutiple CD's going to help,
or is it purely on hardware grounds, no dvd-rom.
Does no one remember what happened last tim
On 13/06/09 19:22, Robert 'Bob' Jensen wrote:
- "Itamar Reis Peixoto" wrote:
the user's still able to install using netboot.iso.
Yeah some guy in a mud hut with no DSL only a 56k modem, Power 4 hours a day...
NetInst FAIL.
Just curious.
But if a user has bandwidth problems,
how i
On 12/06/09 17:00, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 14:30 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
I've been tired for some time of watching rpmnew and rpmsave files. I've
been looking for some tool, but did not find any, so I wrote my own.
http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/rpmconf/rpmconf
Befor
Paul Jakma wrote:
On Tue, 9 Jun 2009, Warren Togami wrote:
setarch i386 chroot /path/to/i586root
Do this and yum will behave properly.
Ok, that should improve things if I want to do a series of installs.
Thanks!
It's still extra typing though. Also, any ideas on having the x86_64
kernel
Hoping to package BlueJ.
http://www.bluej.org/about/what.html
Q1:
http://www.bluej.org/download/download.html
Downloadable jar file, (and use contents of)
or
http://www.bluej.org/download/source-download.html
Contains mix of Win\Mac\*nix stuff in the source zip
Q2:
The third party bits that are
Bastien Nocera wrote:
Heya,
Yesterday, I was browsing Ubuntu's "Blueprints" for their next release,
and saw this:
https://blueprints.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/desktop-karmic-gnomescan
gnome-scan is already packaged by Deji, but I gather that more
integration work could be done to make set
Kevin Kofler wrote:
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Me thinks, your are just being lazy and are trying to rudely push around
Fedora's user base. "customer-friendliness" is something entirely
different from your attitude.
Fedora's "customers" aren't paying us anything,
That's the way it was\is setup
Matej Cepl wrote:
but I think if somebody
skilled in programming Perl (hint, hint) would work on https://
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189813 (and its upstream
counterparts), situation of our reporters COULD improve.
Matěj
Is it time then to setup
programming-l...@fedoraproject.org
Does trying to become a packager.
Involve being currently a Developer,
as in Programming skills\certification,
whether Perl\Python\c++ etc.
Frank
--
msn: frankly3d skype: frankly3d
Mailing-List Reply to: Mailing-List
Still Learning, Unicode where possible
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fed
Valent Turkovic wrote:
I'm testing Rawhide with latest updates and KPackageKit fails to do
updates, I get this error log:
http://fpaste.org/paste/13851
It is works for you haven't tested it please do, if it works for you
then ignore this message, if not then reply if you need some more
feedback
James Laska wrote:
===
1. How did you find out about Fedora Test Days?
Test-List
2. Was sufficient documentation available to help you participate in a
Fedora Test Day? If not, what did you find missing or in need of
improvement?
Yes
3. Did you enco
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 05/31/2009 05:42 PM, Frank Murphy (Frankly3d) wrote:
Lat meeting log seems to be:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Development#Communication
It's not active anymore. The Fedora Development custom spin has also
been dropped.
Guessing lack of Interest?
So
Lat meeting log seems to be:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Development#Communication
Frank
--
msn: frankly3d skype: frankly3d
Mailing-List Reply to: Mailing-List
Still Learning, Unicode where possible
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/ma
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 05/31/2009 03:52 PM, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote:
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Furthermore, it is not just "illegal spin",
I don't know about illegal but the name "Russian Fedora" is a violation
of the Fedora trademark guidelines, clearly.
Rahul
There
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 05/31/2009 12:42 PM, Frank Murphy (Frankly3d) wrote:
http://www.itwire.com/content/view/25215/1090/1/1
Not intending to burn the house down.
But, going by this article:
http://www.itwire.com/content/view/25215/1090/1/1
Dated 25th May. Unease sets in.
It is not clear
http://www.itwire.com/content/view/25215/1090/1/1
Not intending to burn the house down.
But, going by this article:
http://www.itwire.com/content/view/25215/1090/1/1
Dated 25th May. Unease sets in.
Frank
--
msn: frankly3d skype: frankly3d
Mailing-List Reply to: Mailing-List
Still Learning, Un
Looking at following:
http://broadcast.oreilly.com/2009/05/the-mips-processor-and-the-150-1.html
How is Fedora in regards to running mips\arm processors?
Frank
--
msn: frankly3d skype: frankly3d
Mailing-List Reply to: Mailing-List
Still Learning, Unicode where possible
--
fedora-devel-list m
What is the most recent Devel-Spin?
Will there be one for GA?
Frank
--
msn: frankly3d skype: frankly3d
Mailing-List Reply to: Mailing-List
Still Learning, Unicode where possible
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel
Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
- yum
as I said I demand for a list even if it's with false positives
Couldn't it be the job of those who care to maintain this list in the
first place ?
no problem, just give me a procedural way other than watching all
packages in pkgdb [so that I catch t
Dr. Diesel wrote:
If they do get installed, it would probably not be an accident.
Whatever the moral\cultural situation
Frank
Yes! Use Firefox for example where you can end up on a "questionable
site" by accident!
That is true, but would not something like DansGuardian,
b
Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
in case you have accepted to put such packages in the repo
please maintain a wiki page listing all of them so that we can add
exclude for all of them in
fedora .repo files
sorry, but our users trust us [in ojuba.org spin] to provide packages
that respect our family values
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
My packaging survey turned up a interesting suggestion
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2009-May/msg01809.html
We don't currently have any guidelines covering this but considering the
Debian action to hot babe
http://lwn.net/Articles/113644/
I wanted to as
Bill Nottingham wrote:
Peter Lemenkov (lemen...@gmail.com) said:
... what exactly are you trying to accomplish?
Make it legal to ship MP3 code? Sorry, those are patented in Europe as well.
Patents are *currently* illegal in Europe, (though they may be granted).
The patents offices being
93 matches
Mail list logo
