On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 07:42 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le jeudi 12 novembre 2009 à 06:51 +0200, Gilboa Davara a écrit :
I own both icewm and idesk.
As far as I know, both icewm and idesk are linked against xft and should
not default to core fonts. (Unless I completely misunderstanding
On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 13:11 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Hi,
It has been plain since 2003¹ our new font access standard would be
fontconfig. Since then most users of the old core fonts X11 backend have
migrated, but there are still a few stragglers.
Unfortunately these stragglers matter.
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 06:51 +0200, Gilboa Davara wrote:
I own both icewm and idesk.
As far as I know, both icewm and idesk are linked against xft and should
not default to core fonts. (Unless I completely misunderstanding
something...)
- Gilboa
OK. Did some reading. I more-or-less
On Sun, 2009-06-21 at 18:15 -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote:
You'll also want to watch out for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506189
Good times!
Uggg...
- Gilboa
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
Hello all,
While not strictly a -devel issue, the advise I'm seeking does raise an
interesting issue.
I've got a number of workstations running a combination of F9 and F10.
All are using LVM over software RAID5. (DM)
I've done a test upgrade on the workstation (including a partial
migration of
On Sat, 2009-06-20 at 16:34 +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
Gilboa Davara wrote:
Far worse, the F9 workstations are reaching EOL, and I cannot install
F10 on them due to known anaconda issue (That was fixed during the F11
devel cycle) so in short, I'm in deep ...
Can you upgrade them
On Sat, 2009-06-13 at 21:05 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Too bad their hardware benchmarks do not match the development news, and too
bad they also feel it necessary to continuously warn about alleged
unsuitability of the Free drivers for production use (when in reality they
just work as long as
On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 21:49 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2009-06-13 at 05:43 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
and no, glxgears is not a benchmark!
Indeed, glxgears really sucks as as a benchmark, Phoronix's benchmark suite
(as imperfect as it is) is definitely more useful.
I
On Sat, 2009-06-13 at 12:20 +0200, drago01 wrote:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Gilboa Davaragilb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 21:49 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2009-06-13 at 05:43 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
and no, glxgears is not a benchmark!
Indeed,
On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 15:24 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Eric Springer wrote:
Especially considering how many people will use these benchmarks to make
conclusions about Fedora, we should make sure it presents as best as it
can.
I think we should rather do an informative press campaign on
On Sat, 2009-06-13 at 04:33 +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote:
On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 15:24 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Eric Springer wrote:
Especially considering how many people will use these benchmarks to make
conclusions about Fedora, we should make sure it presents as best as it
can
On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 19:08 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2009-06-13 at 04:33 +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote:
Kevin,
I must admit that I didn't expect such childish reaction from someone
like you.
BTW, I suspect that Kevin's position has a lot to do with the response
KDE 4 got
On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 19:05 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2009-06-13 at 04:33 +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote:
You don't like Phoronix' benchmark? Why? What should they have done
differently? Have you ever contacted Phoronix (E.g. Using their forums)
and tried to resolve these issues
On Fri, 2006-03-17 at 09:15 -0500, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 12:59 +0100, Karsten Hopp wrote:
I've prepared vim-7 prerelease packages, they are available from
http://people.redhat.com/karsten/
Most prominent new features are gvim with windows in multiple tab
On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 13:28 +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
In nVidia/ATI's defense, unlike previous FC/non-GPL problems (udev, 4K
stacks, etc) the problem is not with the closed source drivers failing
to follow the latest kernel trunk.
Beside releasing their code under GPL (Which is a
Hello all,
Problem list:
* During installation the grub configuration prompt did not appear.
* Installation finished successfully.
Reboot:
1. Kernel was not installed.
2. Grub was not configured.
3. coreutils rpm was not installed.
4. As a result, rawhide could not be rebooted.
Gilboa
On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 14:02 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hans Kristian Rosbach wrote:
On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 12:08 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Sadda Teh wrote:
Is FC5 still on schedule to be release March 15th? Thanks.
Yes it is.
Just a general
Bernie Innocenti wrote:
On 06/02/09 03:43, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Bernie Innocenti wrote:
Disk /dev/sdb: 2055 MB, 2055208960 bytes
221 heads, 2 sectors/track, 9081 cylinders
I don't know where fdisk, the Linux kernel, or whatever come up with
these kinds of geometries. They're almost
18 matches
Mail list logo
