within the client side cache timeout. But I'm not sure
how easy that is.
--
James Antill - ja...@fedoraproject.org
http://yum.baseurl.org/wiki/releases
http://yum.baseurl.org/wiki/whatsnew/3.2.26
http://yum.baseurl.org/wiki/YumMultipleMachineCaching
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel
it, just extract the package to
/var/cache/abrt-di. ABRT doesn't remove it automatically, but it's a
planned feature.
Why do you do this?
--
James Antill - ja...@fedoraproject.org
http://yum.baseurl.org/wiki/releases
http://yum.baseurl.org/wiki/whatsnew/3.2.26
http://yum.baseurl.org/wiki
at the moment (it just fails with an update
error) but I'll work on something a little bit more user friendly.
How do you plan on restarting firefox? Or you just planning to kill()
and get the user to restart?
--
James Antill - ja...@fedoraproject.org
http://yum.baseurl.org/wiki/releases
http
a bug?
Yum version is yum-3.2.25-1.fc12.noarch
Maybe3 a better question is:
What do you want to achieve by setting this value to 1?
--
James Antill - ja...@fedoraproject.org
http://yum.baseurl.org/wiki/releases
http://yum.baseurl.org/wiki/whatsnew/3.2.25
http://yum.baseurl.org/wiki
On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 08:16 -0500, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Thu, 10 Dec 2009, Panu Matilainen wrote:
Yup, but this isn't createrepo crashing (the earlier one was):
2009-12-09 20:11:04 mash: createrepo: finished
/mnt/koji/mash/rawhide-20091209/development/x86_64/os/
2009-12-09 20:11:05
will fail anyway?
--
James Antill - ja...@fedoraproject.org
http://yum.baseurl.org/wiki/releases
http://yum.baseurl.org/wiki/whatsnew/3.2.25
http://yum.baseurl.org/wiki/YumMultipleMachineCaching
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo
On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 20:45 +0530, Rajeesh K Nambiar wrote:
On 12/10/09, James Antill ja...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 18:00 +0530, Rajeesh K Nambiar wrote:
I changed the installonly_limit to 1 from the default value 3 in
/etc/yum.conf, and yum blows up.
# yum search
want to support slower machines ... _you_ will have
to do the work, you might get help from the community but just ranting
on f-d-l Everyone should solve my problems is unlikely to actually
help. IMO.
--
James Antill - ja...@fedoraproject.org
http://yum.baseurl.org/wiki/releases
http
attacks?
--
James Antill - ja...@fedoraproject.org
http://yum.baseurl.org/wiki/releases
http://yum.baseurl.org/wiki/whatsnew/3.2.25
http://yum.baseurl.org/wiki/YumMultipleMachineCaching
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel
it or not in the relevant repodata when it
gets promoted or demoted.
One problem is that atm. when it moves from testing to updates, or
rawhide to GA, it also gets resigned with a different key ... so the
bits are not the same. Having the URL be the same will not be helpful
until that changes.
--
James
is.
--
James Antill - ja...@fedoraproject.org
http://yum.baseurl.org/wiki/releases
http://yum.baseurl.org/wiki/whatsnew/3.2.25
http://yum.baseurl.org/wiki/YumMultipleMachineCaching
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
repodata pointing to subsets.
As Jesse said you could also use hardlinks/symlinks in the x86_64 repo.
Or you could even create three repos. i386, x86_64 and i386-common (not
that I think that will be better than the other two options).
--
James Antill - ja...@fedoraproject.org
http
being allowed to update/install apache related packages.
--
James Antill - ja...@fedoraproject.org
http://yum.baseurl.org/wiki/releases
http://yum.baseurl.org/wiki/whatsnew/3.2.25
http://yum.baseurl.org/wiki/YumMultipleMachineCaching
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 10:27 -0500, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009, James Antill wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 22:32 +, Colin Walters wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 10:02 PM, James Morris jmor...@namei.org wrote:
Possibly (it could simply be that an updated policy is weaker
that this mindset is
what lead to this problem initially).
¹ Noting that polkit force removed the remember auth option, for no
particularly sane reason that I've seen ... so if that option turns out
to be the best option, then role-based privileges has (at least
currently) hurt security.
--
James Antill
:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437914
RFE: Yum 32bit for installer? -- as 64bit uses twice as much memory
...on the upside IIRC notting tried the 64bit kernel with 32bit
userspace for F11, and had a single line patch (to rpmUtils.arch) to
make yum happy.
--
James Antill - ja
change, probably worth a BZ against
yum. downgrade also has problems ... of course this should really be the
last time now, so adding any more hacks is going to be a low priority.
--
James Antill - ja...@fedoraproject.org
http://yum.baseurl.org/wiki/releases
http://yum.baseurl.org/wiki/whatsnew/3.2.25
On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 13:38 -0500, Stu Tomlinson wrote:
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 13:19, James Antill ja...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 13:03 -0500, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
[...]
For example, 'yum update iw' does nothing; 'yum install iw' results in
an error message
to get their admin to do it.
² If /var is on a separate partition then spamming /var/tmp is a goood
first step here.
--
James Antill - ja...@fedoraproject.org
http://yum.baseurl.org/wiki/releases
http://yum.baseurl.org/wiki/whatsnew/3.2.25
http://yum.baseurl.org/wiki/YumMultipleMachineCaching
, it logs the user the API is running from
there. But it doesn't set loginuid, so yum history, auditd, SELinux,
etc. don't know.
--
James Antill - ja...@fedoraproject.org
http://yum.baseurl.org/wiki/releases
http://yum.baseurl.org/wiki/whatsnew/3.2.25
http://yum.baseurl.org/wiki
a big
hammer, but just because its a bit of a blunt instrument doesn't mean
we shouldn't take advantage of it.
This implies that all you have is a hammer but you can already run
yum history undo.
--
James Antill - ja...@fedoraproject.org
I'd just like to see a realistic approach to updates via
to be exercises in randomly picking the
features you think they really want, from what is desired.
Yum history assumes you are happy with just #1 and/or #3.
Snapshots assume you are happy to take a lot of collateral damage to
get #5 and/or #7.
--
James Antill - ja...@fedoraproject.org
http
of things they got from this place for testing
of updates.
I must meditate on this.
--
James Antill - ja...@fedoraproject.org
I'd just like to see a realistic approach to updates via
packages. -- Les Mikesell
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com
a month or two later.
How would this be different from updates-testing? If you install
yum-plugin-aliases it even has predefined aliases lsuT and upT to get
the list of updates from testing, and update to them. bodhi has support
for it etc.
--
James Antill ja...@fedoraproject.org
Fedora
amounts of code and
significant problems on the f-i side.
--
James Antill ja...@fedoraproject.org
Fedora
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
use it? (remember this thread started because the Fedora QA group wants
to use it).
Maybe we should split the packaging guidelines into ones everyone has
to follow and ones that are really anal and only unpopular packages have
to follow.
--
James Antill ja...@fedoraproject.org
Fedora
the entire rpm (and thus. is over
compressed data).
...but to me this is all a _problem_in_xz_, not presto/deltarpms. If
nobody can fix xz before F12 GA then IMNSO we should revert the
compression to something that works ... the minor savings in xz
compression isn't worth as much as delta's.
--
James
that drpms on rawhide will still suck upto F12, but I
could live with that :).
I assume we don't do F11 = F12 drpms?
On the other side of it, does anyone have any stats. on how much was
saved by using Xz instead of bzip2? -- Ie. what we'd lose if we did a
mass rebuild.
--
James Antill ja
together what
might have happened at #1 after the fact.
¹ It's also true that saving 1 cent of disk space isn't at the top of my
list of things to do.
--
James Antill ja...@fedoraproject.org
Fedora
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 14:21 -0400, Bill McGonigle wrote:
On 07/31/2009 01:12 AM, James Antill wrote:
*sigh*, if you want to do some benchmarking of different package
managers available in Fedora (zypp makes the 4th, if apt is working
again) then feel free to actually do _a bunch of work_
probably very hard to compare
performance well because of the different design goals and features/etc.
I'm not sure I'd say it's impossible though.
--
James Antill - ja...@fedoraproject.org
I'd just like to see a realistic approach to updates via
packages. -- Les Mikesell
--
fedora-devel-list
it works in yum when
that's the case, but I've never seen it in MM metalink responses.
--
James Antill ja...@fedoraproject.org
Fedora
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
still works
as did gedit python plugins.
For the impatient the koji build was:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1567632
--
James Antill ja...@fedoraproject.org
Fedora
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora
feel free to not do so
on f-d-l. Likewise with quick benchmarks like this (which amounts to
the same thing, IMO).
HTH. HAND.
--
James Antill ja...@fedoraproject.org
Fedora
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
, but CD RW.
--
James Antill ja...@fedoraproject.org
Fedora
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 14:55 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Jon Ciesla wrote:
James Antill wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 11:37 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Jonathan Dieter wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 11:17 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
I installed F-11 fedora-release* and did yum
#1 means you'll get all the other updates from updates-testing, #2 is
more typing.
--
James Antill ja...@fedoraproject.org
Fedora
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
37 matches
Mail list logo
