, and they give us a way to
decode digital video on Fedora w/o violating any codec patents, since
the decoding is done entirely in hardware (this is pretty similar to the
mpeg2 decoder on the Hauppauge WinTV PVR-350 in that respect).
Please and thank you, etc., etc.
--
Jarod Wilson
ja...@redhat.com
pretty well under
Mac OS X. Might depend on some of the stuff being done by the
gnome-shell folks though, to be able to group windows together as
belonging to the same process/application to be able to do it Right
under a Linux DE...
--
Jarod Wilson
ja...@redhat.com
--
fedora-devel-list mailing
On 1/6/10 1:41 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 17:32 +, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 01/06/2010 05:00 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 11:36 -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
I'd go with don't let a different app steal focus. Windows for the
same currently focused app
there was some confusion in my use of private branch, where I
was referring to branches with a name ^private-*, while Kevin was
thinking in a more general sense, which would encompass the above kernel
example.
--
Jarod Wilson
ja...@redhat.com
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list
maintainer to come in after
you and have to dig around for a private branch to update a build.
--
Jarod Wilson
ja...@redhat.com
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
release term.
As others have said to *me* recently for other reasons... Congrats and
condolences to the new FESCo members. ;)
--
Jarod Wilson
ja...@redhat.com
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
a form of multitouch? Or are we talking about extending that to pinch,
rotate, etc?
--
Jarod Wilson
ja...@redhat.com
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
.
--
Jarod Wilson
ja...@redhat.com
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
aftermarket upgrades one could purchase. I had a Beige G3 tower running
at 533MHz with 768MB of RAM at one point in time, iirc.
--
Jarod Wilson
ja...@redhat.com
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On 09/29/2009 01:16 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 12:13 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
Rawhide is still based on dist-f12. We have no cute name for
dist-f13.
Futurehide
Runandhide
--
Jarod Wilson
ja...@redhat.com
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
On 09/16/2009 08:02 AM, Pim Zandbergen wrote:
Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
On 07/09/2009 02:31 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
That said, I have it up and running on an F11 host at home right now,
satisfying everything else w/Fedora packages.
Yeah same here.
Did any of you create a calendarserver
/#/Everything/ instead?
--
Jarod Wilson
ja...@redhat.com
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On Wednesday 22 July 2009 11:58:11 Jesse Keating wrote:
On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 10:57 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
Only thing I'm not terribly wild about is storing the pre-release tree
in /pub/fedora/linux/releases/#/Everything/. Its bound to cause some
confusion amongst the general population
, I think I've been sufficiently convinced that
dropping the bits into /pub/fedora/linux/releases/ is just fine after
all. Thank you for the enlightenment. ;)
--
Jarod Wilson
ja...@redhat.com
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo
really
leaves only the original Pentium series that would benefit from an
i586 secondary arch. At least, that's my vague recollection of it all
right now... :)
--
Jarod Wilson
ja...@redhat.com
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo
, but for the moment, I've taken ownership of the devel
branch to stave off purging, since I use ctrlproxy myself...
--
Jarod Wilson
ja...@redhat.com
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
with ksplice. Thus
it seems highly unlikely it'll ever work in its current form for
arbitrary kernel revisions.
Trying to ksplice from 2.6.29.4 in the installer to say 2.6.30.1 or even
to 2.6.31 does sound like massive fail...
--
Jarod Wilson
ja...@redhat.com
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
no mention of
1.5.x on the front page anyway. Where does it get it?
Fedora 11 has libevent 1.4.5. The calendarserver auto-build script
tries to build 1.4.8. If you install libevent 1.4.11 from rawhide, its
perfectly happy with that.
--
Jarod Wilson
ja...@redhat.com
--
fedora-devel-list mailing
On Thursday 09 July 2009 17:02:45 Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
On 07/09/2009 02:31 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Monday 06 July 2009 10:49:31 Eric Sandeen wrote:
Nathanael Noblet wrote:
On Jul 5, 2009, at 9:33 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
..
Well their python run script checks for its
On Thursday 09 July 2009 17:15:47 Jarod Wilson wrote:
Stuff in Fedora, but simply not used for whatever reason:
-vobject (we have python-vobject)
-pyflakes
I thought they were used if found... I'd have to look at the run file to
see if they ignore the system versions
tree some time, its littered with packages that have a
.fc6 tag in them. :)
But RHEL does X is indeed irrelevant either way.
[1] doesn't mean a mass rebuild won't happen for RHEL6. Also doesn't
mean that it will. Hand-wavy can't talk about unreleased products...
--
Jarod Wilson
ja...@redhat.com
On Wednesday 17 June 2009 15:17:28 Jesse Keating wrote:
On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 15:14 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
I thought an official spin could only be a live image. i.e., once you
start letting the user choose packages in anaconda, it can't be an
official spin anymore. At least, I'm pretty
an official spin could only be a live image. i.e., once you
start letting the user choose packages in anaconda, it can't be an
official spin anymore. At least, I'm pretty sure that was the case a
while back, unless the guidelines have changed while I had my head
buried in the sand.
--
Jarod Wilson
ja
if
there is a formal feature page for this yet or not...
--
Jarod Wilson
ja...@redhat.com
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
they may not be all that interesting.
(One is an Epson somethingorother, one is a Microtek, both are
reasonably nice scanners)
--
Jarod Wilson
ja...@redhat.com
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
25 matches
Mail list logo
