Jon Ciesla wrote:
Jussi Lehtola wrote:
On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 16:35 +0530, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala wrote:
Jussi Lehtola wrote:
Even though any proven packager could do the change, that bug does not
fall in the items listed in the proven packager policy [1]. You
haven't
listed any problems
Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On 01/05/2010 11:30 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tue, 2010-01-05 at 11:03 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
On the other hand, with the
guideline being so widely ignored, I'm not in a hurry to do work to
comply with it ...
Isn't that a chicken/egg problem?
Jussi Lehtola wrote:
On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 16:35 +0530, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala wrote:
Jussi Lehtola wrote:
Even though any proven packager could do the change, that bug does not
fall in the items listed in the proven packager policy [1]. You haven't
listed any problems with the current
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
I am working on getting squashfs-tools 4.1 in rawhide. It has wrapper
functions that are set up to use streaming compression/uncompression
from the LZMA SDK 4.65 library.
Currently the LZMA SDK 4.32 library is in Fedora, but is no longer supported
upstream and is not
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 09:36:59PM +0530, Vivek Shah wrote:
Hi,
Trying to take biniax and bastet, same problems.
Tried taking up peppy (successful on the devel branch) but the same
problem occurred on the other branches and for xpad as well.
If
Josephine Tannhäuser wrote:
2009/12/21, Orcan Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com:
I tried to push the Take ownership button on python-rabbyt's devel
branch and it worked. Then I pushed Release Ownership. That worked
too. Do you get an error message when you use those buttons? Are you
logged in?
Nicoleau Fabien wrote:
Hi,
I'm packaging a software that requires :
/usr/bin/jpegtran (provided by libjpeg) and /usr/bin/tiffinfo (provided
by libtiff).
If I explicitely put libjpeg and libtiff in Requires, rpmlint complains
because I don't let RPM find the libs.
Is there a way to include
Jussi Lehtola wrote:
On Fri, 2009-12-18 at 18:12 +0100, Nicoleau Fabien wrote:
My question is :
is it good to provide a -cli package that does not provides a separate
script or executable file, and that will work only if the user is
carefull to not launch it in a way that it does not require
Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 12:19:47PM -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
Using the Fedora Range Voting method, each candidate could attain a
maximum of 864 votes (4*216).
Results:
1. Adam Jackson (ajax) 1028
I think there's a discrepency here
Adam Jackson wrote:
On Fri, 2009-12-18 at 12:19 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
Information:
At close of voting there were:
216 valid ballots
Using the Fedora Range Voting method, each candidate could attain a
maximum of 864 votes (4*216).
Results:
1. Adam Jackson (ajax)
José Matos wrote:
On Wednesday 09 December 2009 19:38:55 Jeff Spaleta wrote:
For F13 you probably want to push latest versions of the both scipy
and matplotlib together. So if you take scipy* sign up for matplotlib*
as well.
Not only those but also:
python-basemap -- Plots data on
Jeff Spaleta wrote:
Good Alaskan Morning!
In two weeks I'm going to be in Antarctica for a month+ and I'm
looking for other packagers to step in for me and maintain my packages
and prepare them for F13. I'm not exactly sure what my time and
bandwidth access will be so I'm planning for the
Jon Ciesla wrote:
Neal Becker wrote:
I no longer wish to maintain dblatex. Any takers?
I can if none of the co-maintainers want it.
-J
Ping?
--
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https
Matthew Booth wrote:
The separate updates directory has been a pain for as long as I've
been using RHL/Fedora Core/Fedora. It means you have two places to
look when searching for packages manually, and twice as much to
configure when you're configuring yum. It has never benefitted me, or
Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 09:00:53AM -0600, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Matthew Booth wrote:
The separate updates directory has been a pain for as long as I've
been using RHL/Fedora Core/Fedora. It means you have two places to
look when searching for packages manually
Neal Becker wrote:
I no longer wish to maintain dblatex. Any takers?
I can if none of the co-maintainers want it.
-J
--
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
repo-font-audit wrote:
Dear packager,
At 20091122T202901Z, your “gnu-free-fonts” package failed one or more of the
tests
I was performing on the “fedora-devel” repository located at:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-f13-build-current/x86_64/
There are three different reasons
Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Hi,
With a little delay here are the font audit results for Fedora 12 and
snip
Special mention goes to jussilehtola for xine-ui: not only he
managed to add 27 font files not packaged according to Fedora guidelines
during the F-12 cycle, but 14 are copies of the same
Jon Stanley wrote:
The message will contain the
name of the file, the package
concerned, the md5sum, and the
user that uploaded it. An example is
below:
File upload.cgi for package sportrop-fonts has
been uploaded to the
lookaside cache with md5sum
26489f9e92601f0f84cfbb278c2b98e1 by
nodata wrote:
Am 2009-11-18 18:08, schrieb nodata:
Yikes! When was it decided that non-root users get to play root?
Ref:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534047
This is horrible!
Just to elaborate:
A local user is allowed to install software on the machine without
being
Seth Vidal wrote:
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009, Jon Ciesla wrote:
nodata wrote:
Am 2009-11-18 18:08, schrieb nodata:
Yikes! When was it decided that non-root users get to play root?
Ref:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534047
This is horrible!
Just to elaborate:
A local user
Seth Vidal wrote:
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Seth Vidal wrote:
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009, Jon Ciesla wrote:
nodata wrote:
Am 2009-11-18 18:08, schrieb nodata:
Yikes! When was it decided that non-root users get to play root?
Ref:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id
Seth Vidal wrote:
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009, nodata wrote:
-sv
I do if it's in the default DVD install, or was pulled in in an
upgrade. I've never intentionally installed it, and yes I do. Never
imagined it would be a problem. I'll remove it.
Maybe you and I have a different concept of
Seth Vidal wrote:
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Seth Vidal wrote:
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009, nodata wrote:
-sv
I do if it's in the default DVD install, or was pulled in in an
upgrade. I've never intentionally installed it, and yes I do. Never
imagined it would be a problem. I'll
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 02:45:10 +0100
Christoph Wickert christoph.wick...@googlemail.com wrote:
This is a follow-up to my mail from October 9th [1]
As per unresponsive package maintainer policy, Claudio is now
officially considered missing in action and his packages [2] will
King InuYasha wrote:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at
mailto:kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
King InuYasha wrote:
I just saw this article about an effort to create Universal
binary style
ELF binaries for Linux, and I thought that this
Rudolf Kastl wrote:
2009/10/7 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Rahul Sundaram
sunda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On 10/06/2009 05:35 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Additionally, having OLPC-specific RPMS in mainline Fedora helps with
the end goal
Peter Robinson wrote:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Rudolf Kastl che...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/10/6 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Rudolf Kastl che...@gmail.com wrote:
yum list all |grep olpc
dracut-modules-olpc.x86_64
Seth Vidal wrote:
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 12:13 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
Rawhide is still based on dist-f12. We have no cute name for
dist-f13.
Futurehide
I expect that to be the name of a scifi book published by ToR
-sv
Yeah, but a movie then
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:57:10 +0200
Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
Aloas,
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 07:01:21PM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
I want to start the non-responsive maintainer process for Krzysztof
Kurzawski, because youtube-dl was not updated for several
Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
Hello:
I am starting another job in a few days, and there's a bunch of
packages that I won't be using any longer, and thus won't be a very
good choice for maintainer. Please, someone pick them up:
atanks - Remake of a classic DOS game Scorched Earth
I'll take
Tony Nelson wrote:
I've noticed that F12 will require a CPU with i686 architecture, and
that my Athlon 1.2GHz won't qualify. I accept that F11 is the last
Fedora release that I'll be able to use. My concern is that many
present Fedora users will be unpleasantly surprised that a new
Jonathan Underwood wrote:
2009/8/10 Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com:
a) remove the explicit Requires: numpy from pygtk2, require apps that
actually want this function to Require it themselves
b) fake the numpy data type ABI in pygtk2 itself by cult-and-pasting it
from numpy
c) declare that
Adam Jackson wrote:
On Tue, 2009-08-11 at 07:12 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Adam Jackson wrote:
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 14:40 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Since pygtk2 does actually use numpy, isn't d) the best (albeit most
annoying) option?
Internally? Or just to implement
Adam Jackson wrote:
pygtk2 implements a function called gtk.gdk.get_pixels_array(), which
returns the pixel contents of a GDK pixbuf as a numpy array. Fine and
dandy, but this means it links against numpy (7 megs) which is itself
linked against atlas (12 megs). Kind of a lot for a single
Jesse Keating wrote:
I've now generated the first of the mass rebuild status pages.
http://jkeating.fedorapeople.org/needed-f12-rebuilds.html
http://jkeating.fedorapeople.org/failed-f12-rebuilds.html
I will try to keep these updated multiple times a day.
In the case of the needed rebuilds
wde...@mikrotec.com wrote:
I am new to this list, and I am looking forward to hearing the discussion.
But thanks to bob and others responding to my post on fedoraforum.org
http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=227101 , I think I would
like to broach a subject. My apologies if this is
Rex Dieter wrote:
Jon Ciesla wrote:
Many of mine, and others', seem to be due to the new freeglut. Does
anyone have any pointers for this, generally speaking?
One common issue for at least 2 packages (jasper being one), was that
freeglut no longer links libGLU, so if your package
David Nalley wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 10:30 AM, wde...@mikrotec.com wrote:
I am new to this list, and I am looking forward to hearing the discussion.
But thanks to bob and others responding to my post on fedoraforum.org
http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=227101 , I think I
Philip A. Prindeville wrote:
Philip A. Prindeville wrote:
Hi.
I need a sponsor for this. An RPM has been built on several systems
(including FC8 and FC9 and Centos5) and tested on all of those.
The ticket has been languishing now unassigned for almost a year.
Martin Dubuc wrote:
I would like to build boost 1.39 on RHEL 5.3. In the past, I have been
successful building boost library found in rawhide for RHEL 5.x
distributions. However, I have not been susccessful building boost
1.39 using boost-1.39.0-2.fc12.src.rpm. I saw a message earlier this
Dodji Seketeli wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 13/07/2009 20:36, Tom Lane a écrit :
(Not sure if this is the right list to complain on, but ...)
Trying to do a routine yum update on an F-11 x86 machine is not
working today. It successfully downloaded a bunch of
Josh Boyer wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 08:21:47AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Dodji Seketeli wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 13/07/2009 20:36, Tom Lane a écrit :
(Not sure if this is the right list to complain on, but ...)
Trying to do a routine yum
Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Thursday 16 July 2009 20:25:36 Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 10:11 PM, John
Poelstrapoels...@redhat.com
wrote:
Hi
FESCo,
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/XZRpmPayloads
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features
Bill Nottingham wrote:
Jon Ciesla (l...@jcomserv.net) said:
If this is the case, which is what I was hoping I remembered, then I
agree with you that we don't *really* need it. Bill, can you clarify
the sse2 or no sse2 distinction, and possibly on the wiki page as well,
since
Remi Collet wrote:
Le 13/07/2009 03:17, Jon Ciesla a écrit :
- php-mhash (not maintained)
Is it possible to keep this? I have a package that depends on it, and
there may be others, though I have not checked.
$ repoquery --whatrequires php-mhash
php-pear-Net-DNS-0:1.0.0-3
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 01:22:35PM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
ocaml-pa-do-0.8.9-2.fc12 (build/make) rjones
I checked your logfiles and it seems to have built fine on
both architectures ...
Rich.
Yeah, some of mine built and some didn't. Not sure. . .
Ricky Zhou wrote:
On 2009-07-08 12:30:30 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Is he not responding at axel.th...@atrpms.net?
That's his bugzilla email addess, so that seems to be the case :-(
Thanks,
Ricky
What about i...@fedoraproject.org?
--
in your fear, speak only peace
in your fear, seek
Sven Lankes wrote:
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 12:41:56PM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Is he not responding at axel.th...@atrpms.net?
That's his bugzilla email addess, so that seems to be the case :-(
What about i...@fedoraproject.org?
That is Andreas Thienemann
Ville Skyttä wrote:
I have released ownership of the following packages I haven't used in a while
and don't feel like maintaining just for the fun of it. They're all simple,
very low maintenance ones, in good shape (no open bugs and otherwise), and up
to date with latest upstream versions.
Seth Vidal wrote:
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Seth Vidal wrote:
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Jon Ciesla wrote:
BTW are those new VIA netbooks SSE2-capable?
Additionally, what will this do to RHEL? I can't imagine RHEL
customers being too happy about this for RHEL7(?), and if i386
Not to nag, but it's been going on 2 weeks since the last push. I
assume this is GA-related, which is fine, just curious. I saw some
Bodhi mail for my updates which made me think one was impending, but
haven't seen anything yet. Hoping the next push will resolve the
dependency issues around
Josh Boyer wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 07:34:00AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Not to nag, but it's been going on 2 weeks since the last push. I
*Sigh*
assume this is GA-related, which is fine, just curious. I saw some
Bodhi mail for my updates which made me think one
Bill Nottingham wrote:
Way back when in February [1], FESCo decided that for Fedora 11, i586 would
be the default architecture, and for Fedora 12, it would be some variant of
i686. It's time to follow through on that action item.
I've submitted
Bill Nottingham wrote:
Jon Ciesla (l...@jcomserv.net) said:
PLEASE do not do this.
If we stop supporting Pentium II and Pentium III, I have to buy a whole
lot of new hardware. Dead serious.
Could we do i686 as a secondary arch, and swap with i386 further in the
future?
While
Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com writes:
What CPUs do we lose that F11 supports?
- Intel i586 (all)
- Intel Pentium Pro
- Intel Pentium II
- Intel Pentium III
- 32-bit AMD Athlon
- AMD Geode
- VIA C3
- Transmeta Crusoe
Oh I didn't know my old `2001 PIII
Seth Vidal wrote:
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Jon Ciesla wrote:
BTW are those new VIA netbooks SSE2-capable?
Additionally, what will this do to RHEL? I can't imagine RHEL
customers being too happy about this for RHEL7(?), and if i386 would
still be in RHEL, it would worry me that it would only
Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Tue, 09 Jun 2009 23:30:37 -0400, James wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 20:22 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Given you are
trying to update via. yum, just enabling updates-testing should be the
most fun :). Or you can always just download the above yum, and use yum
I installed F-11 fedora-release* and did yum clean all ; yum update
I got YumRepo Error: All mirror URLs are not using ftp, http[s] or file.
This is a fully updated F-10 system. Manually filling in releasever and
basearch in fedora.repo for basearch and mirrorlist make no difference.
Jonathan Dieter wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 11:17 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
I installed F-11 fedora-release* and did yum clean all ; yum update
I got YumRepo Error: All mirror URLs are not using ftp, http[s] or file.
This is a fully updated F-10 system. Manually filling in releasever
James Antill wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 11:37 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Jonathan Dieter wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 11:17 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
I installed F-11 fedora-release* and did yum clean all ; yum update
I got YumRepo Error: All mirror URLs are not using ftp
Jon Ciesla wrote:
James Antill wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 11:37 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Jonathan Dieter wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 11:17 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
I installed F-11 fedora-release* and did yum clean all ; yum update
I got YumRepo Error: All mirror URLs
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 14:55 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Jon Ciesla wrote:
James Antill wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 11:37 -0500, Jon Ciesla
wrote:
Jonathan Dieter
wrote:
On Tue,
2009-06-09 at 11:17 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
I installed F-11
fedora-release* and did yum clean all
David Nalley wrote:
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 8:00 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 6:23 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I submitted ampache (http://ampache.org/)
Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 9:28 AM, Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net
mailto:l...@jcomserv.net wrote:
David Nalley wrote:
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti
pro...@gmail.com mailto:pro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 06/03/2009 05:18 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 09:20:54AM +0200, Denis Leroy wrote:
In an effort to focus more on FOSS upstream development, I am going to
be orphaning some of my Fedora packages in the near future, starting
with this first
Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 14:16 +0200, Denis Leroy wrote:
On 06/03/2009 01:48 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 09:20:54AM +0200, Denis Leroy wrote:
In an effort to focus more on FOSS upstream development, I am going to
be orphaning some of my
Michael Schwendt wrote:
I'm looking for somebody to become the chkrootkit package owner,
preferably not anyone who just wants to increase the list of owned
packages for some doubtful metrics.
There are no open tickets for chkrootkit in Fedora. Last upstream release
has been in Dec 2007.
68 matches
Mail list logo
