That was definitely informative. Thanks for the explanations.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
No, we should patch the broken packages to work with the current Mono.Cecil.
And upstream deserves a beating for this attitude. :-/ Why am I not
surprised this is coming from the M$-loving Mono community?
Shouldn't Fedora take upstream's design into account? It's their
software, after all.
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
Rudolf Kastl writes:
intel (i965) works fine...
You are lucky. Major regressions there in F-12. On my hardware, this used to
work when nomodeset was passed to kernel. Now, it doesn't any more. With KMS,
on
the other hand,
For the Qt-demo rendering issue on intel, it is fixed by Qt 4.6.
Good to hear!
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
I have two sound cards installed: one onboard and another PCI.
The PCI, the one I do no use very much, works fine. The onboard
is the one which does not save the volumes. Every time I call an application
its master and pcm volume go to the maximum (I see the sliders going to the
top
in
I assumed, via the release notes, that the new Xorg operates in
extend-desktop mode by default.
However, I'm not sure.
When I hook up a running Fedora laptop to a projector, my desktop is
extended. Very nice.
When I hook up the same projector and then -boot- my Fedora laptop, I
am set to
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
This is intentional. Plymouth is rendering the same boot animation on
all heads; not sure we can do much better.
Oh, I don't mind that at all. That's awesome. I understand that
clone mode is excellent for Plymouth.
But after Fedora
Oh, I misunderstood. Yeah, it should remember the previous configuration
you had with this combination of outputs. This information is stored in
~/.config/monitors.xml.
Right. I guess what I'm saying is...it doesn't seem to.
The very first time I booted my laptop with this (800x600)
Please pardon my answering everyone in one email.
To Adam: I have not used my BIOS. The Intel 965 card on my Toshiba
laptop has no BIOS options. I can't even change the default scaling
from full-panel to off. It's really sad.
The OS has to do everything in this laptop, since the BIOS
lt;clonegt;yeslt;/clonegt; line. Every config (including for the
800x600 projector) sets clone to no.
Sorry for the bad escape code. I meant there are no
cloneyes/clone lines at all.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
so, um, you didn't read it, then. =) he simply suggested connecting the
external monitor at grub stage rather than having it plugged in at BIOS
stage, to see if that made a difference.
Oh, curses! Right, sorry about that. When I go back
In F12, the GNOME Help Program (I think it's called Yelp, now?) shows
an error when trying to access Help in either Nautilus or Evolution.
Do these programs not have help available? Or has it simply not been
packaged for the F12 beta?
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
This is unfortunately not actually a helpful topic, but I am deathly curious.
Will GNOME be stuck at 2.26 for the rest of the F11 cycle? Or are
updates in the works, just not ready yet?
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
@Judd, wait for the F12 release, it's the best 'update' and it is not ready
yet!
I hope so. I'm not sure anything can top Fedora 8. Hard to explain
how much I enjoyed that distribution.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
AFAICT, the native LLVM backends don't have that problem. The real problem
with C++ is that Clang's C++ support is experimental and incomplete, so
you're stuck with llvm-g++.
I thought that C doesn't have any crazy name or symbol or
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 3:19 AM, Rahul Sundaram
sunda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Yes. Development releases of Fedora have a large number of debugging
stuff enabled.
I really can't tell if you're joking.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 5:52 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Actually, the ABI issue is only if you use the C code generator, not the
native ones.
I'm not sure I understand. How can LLVM-C be ABI-incompatible with plain GCC-C?
I thought that C doesn't have any crazy name or
I suppose at least this does work even if upstream policy is not to make this
available - however for a newbie just installing F11 and wanting this
available
it is not obvious from install notes or release notes as far as I remember?
It's important to note...
The reason why you can't
What about using LVM to store a pre-update snapshot of your distro?
(Separate root partition from /home and other stuff, of course. Roll
back root).
Highly inconvenient, but it would theoretically work...
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Seth Vidal skvi...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Wed,
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
Newer builds with patches, reverted code with epoch, newer upstream release to
fix the mistake upstream, etc.. To say that there is no way to fix a
mistake is insulting.
I'd like to logic-link here with the following...
On Wed, Oct 14,
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Jud Craft wrote:
They both suffer from the same problem -- new packages may cause
changes in data that are not reversibly compatible with the old
package, and mere package rollback is not useful.
Of course, I imagine that any rollback system that doesn't
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Seth Vidal wrote:
There's no perfect.
we're just going for 'good enough', really.
Ah, so package-rollback is shipped as the halfway-effective crutch,
but it's so easy to implement we might as well offer it anyway
solution.
Or, the excellent implementation of
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Matthew Garrettm...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 05:48:44PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
You have to tell us what we need to change in KDE and give us the necessary
time to adapt, even if it means you have to wait for Fedora 13 to push this
change.
Darn straight. I stand corrected.
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Adam Jacksona...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 13:42 -0500, Jud Craft wrote:
Fedora's deployment of that work, however, is another matter. Does
Fedora offer a variety of environments with a set of common features
I think the Fedora release notes mention that if you run the tool
system-config-display, it will automatically generate an xorg.conf for
you.
From the Common F11 Bugs, under Miscellaneous problems with Intel
graphics adapters :
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F11_bugs#intel-misc-gfx
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
David Tardon wrote:
Let me try another analogy: How do you handle health problems?
You'll visit your doctor. You'll expect him to identify the problem and
to take appropriate steps to solve your issue--that may well
26 matches
Mail list logo
