Hi,
according to Miguel [1], the moonlight covenant was updated and now
allows for redistribution by third parties. Does it change anything wrt.
its inclusion in Fedora?
Julian
[1] http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2009/Dec-17.html
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
W dniu 09.11.2009 17:58, Seth Vidal pisze:
Hey folks,
I put together this list for things I'd like to work on for f13. It's a
list of packages with a file-requires that falls outside of *bin/* and
/etc/* and then the provider(s) for those files.
W dniu 03.11.2009 11:37, Matěj Cepl pisze:
Dne 3.11.2009 05:22, Ankur Sinha napsal(a):
I just wanted to know if wodim is usable (i mean without wasting dvds
like its doing currently for me). From the discussion, I feel it's still
buggy and therefore I'm going to shift to another program (maybe
W dniu 03.11.2009 00:19, Tom spot Callaway pisze:
On 11/02/2009 03:47 PM, Denis Leroy wrote:
On 11/02/2009 07:18 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
That may be true, but since cdrecord is not shippable, it's a pretty
vacuous truth.
Out of curiosity, was that just because of the GPL2-CDDL mix ? Or was
Hi guys,
the review process for EMBOSS was recently completed. A gcc bug (fixed
but not pushed) prevents it from getting built for F-12 and rawhide, but
other than that package is fine.
Unfortunately, due to the fact that jemboss bundles a load of .jar files
and seems to use some com.sun.net
W dniu 18.10.2009 22:45, Mike Cloaked pisze:
Will a build of Thunderbird 3.0rc1 be pushed to updates-testing for F11 when
it
is released?
From MozillaWiki I note that the plan is: Start build: 3rd November (est 10th
Nov) so this will likely be around 3 weeks away.
Thanks
What makes
Hi,
given that F-9 went EOL and thus gchemutils requires the older goffice
in none of the branches, I've decided to orphan it. Createrepo suggests
that abiword is the only remaining user. I've CCed the maintainer and
orphaned it in pkgdb.
Regards,
Julian
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
Rahul Sundaram pisze:
On 07/02/2009 08:51 PM, David wrote:
I disagree that Fedora should be packaging books, both of these can
easily be downloaded via web.
Why package something that has no dependencies?
We package hundreds of things that have no dependencies and can be
downloaded
Jeremy Katz pisze:
On Saturday, June 13 2009, Jussi Lehtola said:
On Sat, 2009-06-13 at 11:12 -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 07:04:12PM +0300, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
Hmm, I'd want netboot.img back, since I normally use a USB stick to
start the network install (OK, there is
Jesse Keating pisze:
On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 08:56 -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
Perhaps we could target some specific scanners on the first attempt?
We
might be able to get some hardware donated to the effort.
~spot, who has several scanners of varying age and quality in a box
I have a
Bill Nottingham pisze:
(If you've never used a construct like %if 0%{?fedora} in your spec
file, you can disregard this message.)
Many packages in Fedora use release-based conditionals such as:
...
%if 0%{?rhel}
%endif
%if 0%{?fedora} 10
%endif
%{?fedora:%global _with_xfce
11 matches
Mail list logo
