Am 21.09.2009 23:24, Till Maas wrote:
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 04:58:32PM -0400, Casey Dahlin wrote:
On 09/21/2009 04:04 PM, Till Maas wrote:
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 08:47:24PM +0200, Martin Gieseking wrote:
during the review of ncrack
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523199) I
Toshio Kuratomi schrieb:
On 09/22/2009 02:43 AM, Martin Gieseking wrote:
Am 21.09.2009 23:24, Till Maas wrote:
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 04:58:32PM -0400, Casey Dahlin wrote:
On 09/21/2009 04:04 PM, Till Maas wrote:
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 08:47:24PM +0200, Martin Gieseking wrote:
during
Hi,
I'd like to see the distributed SCM Fossil (www.fossil-scm.org)
packaged for Fedora because I find the concept of the tool quite
attractive. There was already a review request for it in bugzilla:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521730
After looking into the code I noticed
So my question is: Does Fossil/SQLite fall under the No Bundled
Libraries Act as described on
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/No_Bundled_Libraries or may we use the
bundled copy?
Yes, it does.
If the latest version of fossil needs the latest version of sqlite you
might find that you'll have to
