Jesse Keating wrote:
You're making the assumption that the change was made to save space. It
wasn't. I can't find the original thread right now, but it's part of a
cleanup on configuration tools. Upstream felt it no longer necessary to
expose this
Wow. Did they get any estimates on the %
Stepan Kasal wrote:
Hello,
at certain periods of time, it was recommended to use #!/usr/bin/env .
Some people consider it ugly. (The humble opinion of the author of
this mail is the same.)
Currently there is popular mood to remove /usr/bin/env python, see
Stepan Kasal wrote:
Hello,
at certain periods of time, it was recommended to use #!/usr/bin/env .
Some people consider it ugly. (The humble opinion of the author of
this mail is the same.)
Currently there is popular mood to remove /usr/bin/env python, see
Jon Ciesla wrote:
Since pygtk2 does actually use numpy, isn't d) the best (albeit most
annoying) option?
Full disclosure: Numpy maintainer.
I vote for a) (removing the dependency).
One loses the point of packages unless one actively
minimizes dependencies between them.
cheers,
Pádraig.
--
Till Maas wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 08:41:49PM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
I'm going to orphan glade2.
glade3 is the only actively maintained version of glade, and I don't see
a reason to keep glade2 around any longer.
You should probably retire glade2 if nobody rejects. For more
Ondřej Vašík wrote:
Owen Taylor wrote:
I was rather surprised to see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-6661
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-6076
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-6370
Where the automake was upgraded to
