Matthias Clasen wrote:
I intend to give up the following packages:
libspectre
I can help out here.
-- Rex
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Kevin Kofler wrote:
Matthias Clasen wrote:
I intend to give up the following packages:
[snip]
FYI:
libexif
This is used by a lot of stuff, including kdegraphics (but also WINE and
several GNOME packages).
indeed, I missed that, can jump on that one too.
-- Rex
--
Jussi Lehtola wrote:
Hi,
for some time now I've been experiencing the following problem with
bodhi:
$ make update
Creating a new update for gromacs-4.0.7-1.el4 gromacs-4.0.7-1.el5
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/bodhi, line 360, in module
main()
File
Linuxguy123 wrote:
digiKam 1.0.0 was released today. I think a lot of us are running
1.0-beta 6 installed via yum. Would it be possible to get 1.0.0 into
F12 stable prior to Christmas ?
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/digikam-1.0.0-1.fc12
stable that quickly? I'd feel a bit
Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
2009/11/28 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu:
Rawhide Report wrote:
Compose started at Sat Nov 28 08:15:06 UTC 2009
Broken deps for i386
kipi-plugins-0.8.0-3.fc13.i686 requires libcxcore.so.2
kipi-plugins-0.8.0-3.fc13.i686 requires libcvaux.so.2
kipi-plugins-0.8.0-3
Rawhide Report wrote:
Compose started at Sat Nov 28 08:15:06 UTC 2009
Broken deps for i386
kipi-plugins-0.8.0-3.fc13.i686 requires libcxcore.so.2
kipi-plugins-0.8.0-3.fc13.i686 requires libcvaux.so.2
kipi-plugins-0.8.0-3.fc13.i686 requires libcv.so.2
kipi-plugins-0.8.0-3.fc13.i686
Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 11/23/2009 12:43 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 12:26:41PM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
What is responsible for suspending a laptop when the lid is closed and
it is at the login screen? Running kdm and the machine does not
suspend.
In
Michael Schwendt wrote:
?? No polkit-qt package set in F-12 anymore, although there are builds
in koji.
Fixed these in rawhide/cvs (added Obsoletes to kdebase-workspace), will be
included in next batched kde update.
-- Rex
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
alekc...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi all.
I want to add to comps.xml for F10-F13 some optional packages which I not
own.
To kde-desktop group:
kde-plasma-quickaccess
kde-plasma-runcommand
kde-plasma-translatoid
kde-plasma-yawp
qt-recordmydesktop
skanlite
To graphical-internet group:
arora
This is to announce my intentions to orphan (and hopefully eol) gtk-qt-
engine in fedora.
For F-12+, my plan is to allow the new kcm-gtk package to Obsoletes it. It
will provide a systemsettings/kcm module to configure gtk theming, but
without the problematic Qt gtk engine. See also:
Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
Rex Dieter wrote:
For F-12+, my plan is to allow the new kcm-gtk package
to... provide a systemsettings/kcm module to configure
gtk theming
When will it be available, even as a testing rpm? I
looked in koji and it is not there and yum knows nothing
about
Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
I will give it a try.
After a few hours of testing, I see that the font
selection works well, but the widget style does not work.
I know this is a new program and this is the very first
step.
Works for me (though you'll have to
Rex Dieter wrote:
Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
I will give it a try.
After a few hours of testing, I see that the font
selection works well, but the widget style does not work.
I know this is a new program and this is the very first
step.
Works for me
Tomas Mraz wrote:
We could allow adding numbers after the dist tag in release for this
purpose.
That is already allowed, and encouraged, for branch-specific modfications,
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Minor_release_bumps_for_old_branches
-- Rex
--
Kevin Kofler wrote:
Rex Dieter wrote:
I'm convinced to revert, I'll run the change by my fellow cmake
maintainers (I think we have buy-in from everyone though).
Please test that we really don't end up with standard paths like /usr/lib
or /usr/lib64 in the rpath of installed executables
Theodore Papadopoulo wrote:
There might be some other very good reason for keeping those lines, but
I do not see it (Rex ? since you added the lines,
maybe you remember what was the motivation ?).
I'm convinced to revert, I'll run the change by my fellow cmake maintainers
(I think we have
Theodore Papadopoulo wrote:
I would like to understand why the file macros.cmake as distributed in
fedora-10 defines:
%_cmake_skip_rpath -DCMAKE_SKIP_RPATH:BOOL=ON
or just
%define _cmake_skip_rpath %{nil}
to disable (why it was made a macro, so it's easy to change or override).
It's probably
Christoph Wickert wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 13.10.2009, 10:21 -0700 schrieb Jesse Keating:
On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 22:18 +0530, Parag N(पराग़) wrote:
I am confused here. Why this is removed? I still see xt.pc needs
those Requires.
rpm now autogenerates the pkgconfig requirements,
both
Colin Walters wrote:
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu wrote:
As far as I can tell, gnome-desktop doesn't include explicit (default or
otherwise) fonts either.
I haven't dug through the dependency graph yet, but looking at
fedora-livecd-desktop.ks:
google
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
This would be great if maintainers were willing to fix issues after the
fact. Look at rsync -- there's no incentive to fix the library issue at
this point because rsync is already in the distribution. We need to fix
this lack of incentive for other reasons -- but we
Valent Turkovic wrote:
I found out while compiling some apps manually that they are failing
because they can't find files, I investigated and found out that the
binaries are installed but just not in $PATH.
/usr/lib/qt4/bin/
Is this path left out on purpose?
Shrug, there's app-qt4
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 08/30/2009 10:33 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
Anyway, I'm open to suggestions on how to better achive what we want
here. Maybe drop the kde-plasma-folderview dep, and just add to comps
instead?
FWIW, this is the solution, I prefer.
sounds like a winner, done.
-- Rex
Matthias Clasen wrote:
I have been able to port some 10-12 PolicyKit users from 0.9 to 0.90 in
a matter of a few days. The KDE sig should really be able to get this
port done. We really don't want to ship multiple authorization
databases, that way lies confusion and madness.
The PolicyKitOne
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 08/23/2009 11:18 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Doubtful. How much will that save? - A typical problem with KDE apps is
that not only they pull in some KDE libraries, the KDE packages come with
lots of additional KDE-specific dependencies.
Installing:
ktorrent
Rex Dieter wrote:
Michael Schwendt wrote:
==
The results in this summary consider Test Updates!
==
Summary of broken packages (by src.rpm name
Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote:
I very want see this driver in Fedora:
http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/packages/dkms-tiacx/
This is free and even packaged, so no problem there...
May be except what it dkms? But it have not kernel modules (I known what
it is not permitted) and built
On 08/06/2009 12:37 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
I think the correct question here is why has a perfectly routine version
bump for components included in Fedora been submitted as a 'feature'?
I figure it's largely about which items of the distro gets focus
marketing-wise.
-- Rex
--
Josephine Tannhäuser wrote:
KDE 4.3 will come to F11 and F10. It's a cool thing.
There aren't updates like this for Gnome. Why not?
For the most part, those are hard decisions best left to the discretion of
the maintainers in question.
-- Rex
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
Ville-Pekka Vainio wrote:
results in
`nsISupports::COMTypeInfoint::kIID' referenced in section `.data.rel.ro'
of
/usr/lib64/xulrunner-sdk-1.9.1/lib/libxpcomglue_s.a(nsGenericFactory.o):
defined in discarded section
Christopher Stone wrote:
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Adam Jacksona...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 13:55 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
The KDE SIG is now working on KDE-4.3.0-related builds for Fedora 10 and
11 candidate updates. As this requires some buildroot overrides, if your
Jesse Keating wrote:
It's supported, but there are those of us that feel that it shouldn't be
getting version updates, only bug fixes. Just going by the version
numbers, 4.2.4 to 4.3.0 seems like a fairly big jump. However it could
just be a bugfix rollup, it's hard to tell just by looking
Jon Ciesla wrote:
Many of mine, and others', seem to be due to the new freeglut. Does
anyone have any pointers for this, generally speaking?
One common issue for at least 2 packages (jasper being one), was that
freeglut no longer links libGLU, so if your package uses libGLU symbols, it
Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
2009/7/24 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz:
Nicolas Chauvet píše v Pá 24. 07. 2009 v 10:06 +0200:
This package was orphaned because libatomic_ops is going to be merged
with gc. Do we have a particular rationale about why to continue to
maintain it over splitting
Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 02:48:47PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
kdeedu-4.2.95-1.fc12
kdeedu only uses readline in KAlgebra which is GPLv2+ (and only in the
command-line version (calgebra) at that), so no problems there. (I also
verified that
Up'ing to GraphicsMagick-1.3.x in rawhide, which involves an ABI break.
I'll take care of (re)building dependant apps, dvdauthor and koffice.
Issue tracked here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487605
If you're aware of any other deps I missed, please comment or block the
Manually, sending to -devel list, while one to -announce sits for
moderation...
-
Up'ing to GraphicsMagick-1.3.x in rawhide, which involves an ABI break.
I'll take care of (re)building dependent apps, dvdauthor and koffice.
Issue tracked here:
Rex Dieter wrote:
Ingvar Hagelund wrote:
* Rex Dieter
amarok2 supports qtscript (which is why it currently has a dependency on
qtscriptbindings)
So, it should be possible to access a mounted iPod db in amarok-2.x
using qtscript?
I'm unfamiliar with programatic access to ipod db's
Rahul, I question the point of ... making laundry lists of pros, cons, bugs
of desktop X vs Y... I'm sure folks can come up with a similar list of
gnome (or other) related negative items, or kde-only features too but I
question it's constructiveness.
My only comments here:
1. The desktop
Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) wrote:
1. The desktop spin *is* gnome for cryin out loud. Seriously, common
sense is just screaming in my head to call a spade a spade.
We have a Desktop team. So IMHO the default desktop is what they
decide it to be.
They are currently focused only on Gnome.
Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Sun, 2009-06-28 at 23:35 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Matthew Garrett wrote:
The reality is that KDE *is* a second class citizen in Fedora - it
doesn't get anywhere near the attention that Gnome does.
SARCASMThanks/SARCASM for insulting our (KDE SIG's) work yet
Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 03:05:41 -0500, King wrote:
I found a very strange omission for the qt4-devel package. The path to
qt4-devel binaries (/usr/lib/qt4/bin) isn't automatically added to $PATH
like qt3's are.
Additionally, when I removed the qt3-devel package, the
Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
Hello there,
We have some doubt about the Requires: of a default localization.
For example, eclipse-texlipse needs aspell
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506431
By default I chose aspell-en,
# For Spell-Check (choosing default : English)
Requires:
Seth Vidal wrote:
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Rex Dieter wrote:
Seth Vidal wrote:
It's not about the upgrade process. It is only about compare_providers.
You have 3 pkgs providing 'foo'
foo-1.1.noarch
foo-1.0.x86_64
foo-1.0.i386
Which one do you pick on x86_64 or i686?
We weight
Yaakov Nemoy wrote:
Hey All,
As the subject says, i'm looking to figure out where is the
accountable place for filing bug reports. For anyone who can apply a
quick fix, the repo is missing repo closure, and i can't install the
latest KDE beta because PyKDE is out of date.
fedora-kde
Tom Lane wrote:
Personally I don't use multilib wrappers on arches that don't need it;
I think not needing extra cases in the wrapper header outweighs the
added complexity in the specfile. But I'm not going to tell the gmp
maintainer he's wrong for doing it the other way.
+1
-- Rex
--
Horst H. von Brand wrote:
This whole soft dependencies idea has been discussed to death numerous
times already, and the conclusion has always been that they really don't
solve anything.
Whoa. That's far from my recollection, which is that most folks (me
included) seem to think some variant
Florin Andrei wrote:
The version of memtest86 included on the Fedora installer CDs as a boot
option is 1.55 while the newest memtest86 is now at version 3.2
Check your facts again (note memtest86 != memtest86+) (-:
Now, keeping that in mind, per
http://www.memtest.org/
the latest memtest86+
Janina Sajka wrote:
The grub documentation includes provides kernel failover provisions, but
these don't appear to work.
http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/html_node/Making-your-system-robust.html#Making-your-system-robust
Should I expect this to work?
...
Is there some other mechanism
Louis E Garcia II wrote:
Seems to occur with user accounts. root is ok.
Very strange. It works for me with user accounts. Can you try making a
new account and try that? Something must be different with the computers
or accounts where it doesn't work.
I did some investigating and found that
49 matches
Mail list logo
