Quoting Adam Jackson (a...@redhat.com):
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 11:36 -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On 1/6/10 11:07 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
PGA.
Here's the challenge. To reply to this mail, I hit control-shift-r in
one evo window, and evo opened a new window for me to compose into.
Quoting Adam Jackson (a...@redhat.com):
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 11:23 -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Adam Jackson (a...@redhat.com):
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 11:36 -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
I'd go with don't let a different app steal focus. Windows for the
same currently focused
Quoting Simo Sorce (sso...@redhat.com):
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010 12:35:03 -0600
Serge E. Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Yes, exactly. You're saying that
1. there are cases where you want a window to pop up
2. it's too complicated to figure out which windows should
pop up 3. so
Quoting Adam Jackson (a...@redhat.com):
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 12:35 -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Adam Jackson (a...@redhat.com):
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 11:23 -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
There is no case where I want a new window or popup to take focus.
Makes
Quoting Steve Grubb (sgr...@redhat.com):
On Sunday 26 July 2009 07:32:36 pm Steve Grubb wrote:
What can be done is that we program the application to drop some of the
capabilities so that its not all powerful. There's just one flaw in this
plan. The directory for /bin is 0755 root root. So,
Quoting Dave Airlie (airl...@redhat.com):
On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 01:36 -0400, Ben Boeckel wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dave Airlie wrote:
On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 15:08 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
A few days back I ran into
Quoting Adam Jackson (a...@redhat.com):
On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 14:50 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Dave Airlie (airl...@redhat.com):
Maybe we could do something with SELinux, but I don't think
we can do anything without getting revoke. or maybe some
process capabilties
Quoting Stephen Smalley (s...@tycho.nsa.gov):
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 17:53 -0400, Bill McGonigle wrote:
On 07/28/2009 04:11 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
AFAIK SELinux introduces additional controls and does not replace or
override existing controls. I'm pretty sure non-root still can't
Quoting Bill McGonigle (b...@bfccomputing.com):
On 07/28/2009 04:11 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
Still, is such a change less severe than changing what root means? Is
Fedora that committed to SELinux? What's it going to take to make most
people who shut off SELinux stop doing that?
Moving to
Quoting Steve Grubb (sgr...@redhat.com):
On Sunday 26 July 2009 08:54:26 pm Steve Grubb wrote:
I trust you meant to write 0555?
No, I really mean 005 so that root daemons are using public permissions.
Admins of course have DAC_OVERRIDE and can do anything. Try the script in a
VM and
10 matches
Mail list logo
