On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 02:02:24PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 15:24:05 +0100
Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
You propose that the repo should be enabled by default if the package
is installed. I don't like this. This make it a lot easier to break a
system
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 09:28:26AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
As I proceed to port our make system over into fedpkg, I've ran across a
couple targets that are giving me pause.
Is anybody out there making use of the following targets?
patch
I use this quite often to generate patches, but
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 07:47:10PM +0100, Enrico Scholz wrote:
Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underw...@gmail.com writes:
I have used make patch quite a bit when developing patches. I guess
it's just a wrapper around gendiff though, so it maybe redundant i.e.
in my use case I could have been
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 03:59:14PM -0500, Owen Taylor wrote:
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 16:00 +0100, nodata wrote:
I'd like to suggest an enhancement for Fedora 13: nothing should ever
steal focus from the window I am typing in. If I am typing in a shell
window, or in a word processor, or an
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 10:22:58PM +0100, Hans Ulrich Niedermann wrote:
I thought the canonical URL for downloads from sourceforge.net has been
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/PROJECT/NAME-VERSION.tar.gz?
It should be downloads... not prdownloads... according to the SourceURL
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 08:47:09PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
I'd like to propose splitting out
the /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-rawhide.repo file into a
fedora-release-rawhide subpackage which is NOT installed by default or
shipped on the live media.
I wrote up this using the Feature template,
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 11:38:20AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
till:BADURL:dsmidiwifi-v1.01a.tgz:dsmidiwifi
this seems to be now on google, I'll have to fix it.
till:BADURL:john-1.7.0.2.tar.bz2:john
I'll work on that later, too. After an update the old version was
removed afaics.
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 02:24:17PM -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 13:27 -0500, Fulko Hew wrote:
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
There is no case where _you_ want this, sure.
I'd say... only take focus if its a child/creation
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 03:32:26PM -0500, Peter Jones wrote:
On 01/06/2010 03:21 PM, Till Maas wrote:
How about making the gnome-panel give away its focus to the newly
created window? Within the gnome-panel, it should be pretty obvious
which actions should give away the focus and which should
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 03:29:22PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
Before..
Source0:
http://download.sourceforge.net/usb-midi-fw/midisport-firmware-%{version}.tar.gz
After
Source0:
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/usb-midi-fw/midisport-firmware/%{version}.tar.gz
For 1.2 as
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 11:48:47AM -0500, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On 01/05/2010 11:30 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tue, 2010-01-05 at 11:03 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
On the other hand, with the
guideline being so widely ignored, I'm not in a hurry to do work to
comply with it ...
Isn't
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 10:53:26PM +0100, Karel Klic wrote:
you became the owner in the pkgdb when Daniel Novotny and I agreed to
transfer the package ownership to me. We discovered that the next person
with commit access become the owner when a package is orphaned, and the
package
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 04:35:07PM +0200, Debarshi Ray wrote:
What happens now? Not much I guess, as the list archive obfuscates email
[...]
that give you a feeling of accomplishment?
Just trying to point out the futility of trying to avoid publishing
your Fedora ID. It took me less than
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 03:54:53PM -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Fri, 2009-12-18 at 20:26 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
For libguestfs [RHBZ#547496] I want to add some extra 'Requires'
dependencies by running a shell script over a particular file that
gets generated during the build.
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 11:18:28PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 11/18/2009 11:19 PM, nodata wrote:
Thanks. I have changed the title to:
All users get to install software on a machine they do not have the
root password to
.. if the packages are signed and from a signed repository.
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 04:36:27AM -0500, Ricky Zhou wrote:
On 2009-11-19 10:23:53 AM, Till Maas wrote:
So at least one major security protection measure is not in place and
attackers can create their own repositories with signed packages that
have well known security flaws, e.g. a package
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 07:19:33AM +, Quentin Armitage wrote:
I'm not sure where the correct place to report this is, so apologies if
this is not the right place.
The right place is here:
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/
Regards
Till
pgph1AOZytKWY.pgp
Description: PGP
On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 09:23:08AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 16:38:38 -0600
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
I tried grabbing http://dl.sf.net/glest/glest_data_3.2.1.zip and it
seemed to work. The actual URL in the spec file has the %version
macro.
Is the
On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 09:33:48PM +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
On Thursday 05 November 2009, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
KF == Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com writes:
KF Well, the script I am running uses 'spectool -g' and indeed, it
KF doesn't handle self signed certs:
Honestly, I find
On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 02:51:27PM +, Quentin Armitage wrote:
The CVS daily checkout seeds at http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/webfiles/
don't contain a checkout for F-12. Would it be possible for someone to
add that?
I have also noted that a checkout seed for F-9 is still included, which
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 07:14:39AM -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
On 10/23/2009 07:01 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
It was (mostly) ignored because it doubles the download size and makes the
image no longer fit on a CD, for little benefit.
Yes. It is a solution which adds costs in many, many places
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 11:10:22AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
* Should we expedite these requests in the future if the email address for
the maintainer is no longer in existence?
Yes, please. If the mail address of a maintainers do not work anymore,
then their packages should be orphaned,
On Mon October 19 2009, mcloaked wrote:
Given the recent long thread concerning upstream decisions about defaults
in Thunderbird 3.0beta4 it seems to me that just because upstream makes a
specific decision does not always mean that is the best decision. What
That discussion was not about
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 08:32:56AM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Původní zpráva
Předmět: [opensuse-packaging] Junior Jobs
Datum: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 14:46:58 +0200
Od: Michal Hrusecky mhruse...@suse.cz
Komu: opensuse-packag...@opensuse.org
lately we formulated concept of
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 10:20:17AM +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote:
What would this be good for? Actually for some files it would be a known
bad file hashes because these files (binaries or scripts) would contain
known vulnerabilities and so knowing that you have a file that was once
included in
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 12:00:23AM +0200, nodata wrote:
Am 2009-10-20 23:48, schrieb Till Maas:
Having a hash list of well known files might also help in forensics
analysis to find suspicious files. Also with determining the correct RPM
NVR one could use the repo metadata to check wether
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 10:48:24AM +0400, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
Please, disconnect yourself from the Internet asap, because it's full
of obscene videos, jokes, sexism and so on. And that's great!
Even if something is on the internet, this does not meant that it has a
place within the Fedora
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 01:10:09PM +0400, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
2009/10/16 Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org:
On 10/16/2009 02:29 PM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
You see, I personally prefer to live in the society with some level of
aggressively thinking and speaking minorities, rather
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 10:58:16AM -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On 10/15/2009 10:02 AM, Till Maas wrote:
Hiyas,
I looked into packaging the nesc compiler
(https://sourceforge.net/projects/nescc) and I noticed that it uses the
deprecated intel license for some java files:
http
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 08:57:55PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Till Maas wrote:
I looked into packaging the nesc compiler
(https://sourceforge.net/projects/nescc) and I noticed that it uses the
deprecated intel license for some java files:
http://nescc.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/nescc
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 06:31:03PM +0200, Felix Kaechele wrote:
From the opposite POV:
Why should we make peoples' lives harder getting the tools they need?
Example: Somebody without the DAHDI Kernel Modules would probably not
try to use the DAHDI Tools since he probably won't even know
On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 10:12:04AM +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
Do we have wmii (a window manager, http://wmii.suckless.org) packaged
for Fedora?
I packaged it a while ago for myself, but I am currently using xmonad.
Maybe you can use my old SPECS / SRPMS:
On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 11:10:35PM +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
Is it in line with rawhide? Did you ever pushed it into koji? Do you
have a packaged p2p (plan9 on Unix)?
I never submitted it into Fedora, I just created the SPEC for myself to
test wmii. As you can see from the dates of the
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 12:53:21PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
Secondly, where would be the appropriate place to propose accepting
zsync with the internal zlib? Is that something I should bring to the
packaging committee?
This proposal has already been declined by FESCo:
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 07:24:01PM +0200, Rafał Psota wrote:
2009/9/25 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com
The following packages have been orphaned:
youtube-dl
Also, I would be happy to take 'greyhounds'. Co-maintainers welcome.
I'm a maintainer of metacafe-dl which is similar to
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:20:21AM -0400, James Antill wrote:
...but to me this is all a _problem_in_xz_, not presto/deltarpms. If
nobody can fix xz before F12 GA then IMNSO we should revert the
compression to something that works ... the minor savings in xz
compression isn't worth as much as
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:58:23AM -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Wed, 23 Sep 2009, Till Maas wrote:
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:20:21AM -0400, James Antill wrote:
...but to me this is all a _problem_in_xz_, not presto/deltarpms. If
nobody can fix xz before F12 GA then IMNSO we should revert
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:19:10PM -0400, Adam Goode wrote:
In the bug report, the maintainer seems to suggest that having
co-maintainers are ok: feel free to merge it, but never approves them.
Can someone approve these co-maintainers?
I will probably help to also mention the name and FAS
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 09:00:37AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Wed, 2009-09-23 at 10:23 -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
...but to me this is all a _problem_in_xz_, not presto/deltarpms. If
nobody can fix xz before F12 GA then IMNSO we should revert the
compression to something that works ...
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 07:38:24PM -0400, Andre Robatino wrote:
On 09/23/2009 07:17 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Andre Robatino (an...@bwh.harvard.edu) said:
If I understand correctly what the problem is - that successfully
xz-uncompressing a file requires being on the same endian arch as
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 10:42:20AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On 09/22/2009 02:43 AM, Martin Gieseking wrote:
Am 21.09.2009 23:24, Till Maas wrote:
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 04:58:32PM -0400, Casey Dahlin wrote:
On 09/21/2009 04:04 PM, Till Maas wrote:
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 08:47:24PM
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 08:47:24PM +0200, Martin Gieseking wrote:
during the review of ncrack
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523199) I noticed that the
file ncrack-services is placed in /usr/share/ncrack by default. Since it
is a kind of configuration file that contains
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 04:58:32PM -0400, Casey Dahlin wrote:
On 09/21/2009 04:04 PM, Till Maas wrote:
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 08:47:24PM +0200, Martin Gieseking wrote:
during the review of ncrack
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523199) I noticed that the
file ncrack
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 09:31:49AM +0200, Jan Zeleny wrote:
I already have one developer, who is willing to join me. I'd like to know
your
opinion of this project. And of course if there is anybody who would like to
join, just let me know, I'd be happy to gather some more people to work on
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 10:13:52AM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
The single month you're willing to wait is not much of a problem. There is
a more fundamental problem. The non-responsive packager procedure could
have been started _several_ months earlier. Perhaps one year ago already.
There
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:37:59AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
This was discussed a couple of days ago against another rawhide
report. I would check out the list archives for the reasoning.
I fail to find it. :-( The last report in the old format was 20090902
and I did not find any discussion
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 08:10:03PM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
Maybe something like people need to convince at least two FESCo members
and have no FESCo member object to get this done:
1) Write a mail to fedora-devel with the problems of the package and a
summary of communication attempts
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 11:41:58AM +0400, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
I'll plan to upgrade fuse in Rawhide (and, possibly, in F-11) up to
ver. 2.8.0, and there will be so-name bump. I'll do it next week, if
nobody have any objections. Also I'll try to test all (or as much as I
can) FUSE-related
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 09:32:11PM -0700, Elio Maldonado wrote:
You are right. By reading at Makefile.common it seems that make
new-source nss-softokn-3.12.3.99.3-stripped.tar.bz2
would be the way to place them in the lookaside cache (after I do the
cvs remove on them).
You probably
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 03:07:47PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Michael Schwendt wrote:
Indeed. A single tomboy build obsoleted more than a dozen Mono packages
and actually got marked stable sometimes later without anyone adding
a comment.
I'd blame the tomboy maintainer for the chaos
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:12:35PM +0100, psmith wrote:
jeez when i brought up the idea of fedora using hybrid iso's a few
months back i was basically lambasted by most on this list, now all of a
sudden it's a new F12 feature? wtf???
I am not sure, what the right word is, but there seem
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 03:18:16PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
According to bug #517013, %post scripts should not assume that /dev is
available -- so we can't do anything that requires the existence of
/dev/null, /dev/urandom, etc.
Is this a known and expected packaging rule, or is it a
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 10:48:34AM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Till Maas (opensou...@till.name) said:
I considered IT might be redundant information, too, when
I created the groups, but also both the terms Forensics or Wireless
are not IT specific, therefore I put the IT-security
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 06:35:14AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 08/06/2009 09:33 PM, Till Maas wrote:
currently upstream release monitoring[0] bug filing is opt-in, which
means that it will be only performed for packages that have been activly
added by probably a maintainer of the package
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 11:27:23PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
Speaking just for myself, I'd be happy to have it automatic for my
packages. But wow, who's going to key in all those regexps and keep it
up to date?
On source of normalized data is Oswatershed[0]. My long time vision
would be to
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 10:56:03AM +0200, Pierre-Yves wrote:
It remembers me a website made by Remi[1] which list for all the package
available, for all the branch what version are in the repo.
It also provides comparison between upstream and repo for some packages
such as the PECL, PEAR and
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 10:21:20PM -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 10:11 PM, Rahul
Sundaramsunda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
I would prefer the system to be opt-out. For completely new maintainers
or anyone maintaining more than a few packages, it certainly is very
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 12:28:50PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 08/07/2009 10:48 AM, Till Maas wrote:
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 06:35:14AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 08/06/2009 09:33 PM, Till Maas wrote:
currently upstream release monitoring[0] bug filing is opt-in, which
means
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 09:33:06PM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
Would it be ok, to do this and allow maintainers to add there package to
a black list, so that no bugs will be filed or should it continue to be
opt-in? Then the packags will still be checked, but only reported by
other, non intrusive
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 10:56:10AM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
- BZ seems the wrong place. It's the only push mechanism we have other
than raw e-mail, though.
Pushing messages to maintainers is not the only necessary feature. The
maintainers also need to be able to easily coordinate who
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 01:24:24PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Till Maas (opensou...@till.name) said:
The IT prefix is only used in the group id, which is afaik not visible
to the used and not translated.
No, it's not just in the description.
These tools can be used to perform
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 12:24:18PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 08/06/2009 02:37 AM, Till Maas wrote:
The IT prefix is only used in the group id, which is afaik not visible
to the used and not translated.
That's not true. yum -v grouplist will display them. I use them all
Hiyas,
currently upstream release monitoring[0] bug filing is opt-in, which
means that it will be only performed for packages that have been activly
added by probably a maintainer of the package. There is at least one
maintainer that does not like having these bugs filed for his packages,
so he
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 03:21:41PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Till Maas (opensou...@till.name) said:
The IT prefix is only used in the group id, which is afaik not visible
to the used and not translated.
No, it's not just in the description.
These tools can be used
On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 09:35:28PM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
This will function much like the 'update' target, it will prompt you to
edit a file to fill in the target and a description of your change. It
will use a cli tool (fedora-hosted) to file a ticket in the rel-eng trac
for you, and
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 10:00:24AM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Recently, you've added the following groups to comps:
it-security-code-analysis
it-security-forensics
it-security-intrusion-detection
it-security-reconnaissance
it-security-wireless
it-security-password-recovery
You've
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:44:52PM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Sat, 2009-08-01 at 00:58 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
I don't think anybody is going to argue that extracting source from srpm
or pulling tarball + patches from our package cvs is ideal. So I don't
see why we should
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 01:54:20PM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
It was in my post to the last thread::
Is someone in a position to verify whether setting security flags on a
bug prevents someone who would be put in the CC list by the default cc
attribute would or would not let people see
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 06:30:27AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Is the same thing true of watching a person? till, I'm now watching
till-opensource.name, if you want to open a new security bug and see if
I get CC'd.
I created https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514518
According to
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 07:12:00AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On 07/29/2009 07:05 AM, Till Maas wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 06:30:27AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Is the same thing true of watching a person? till, I'm now watching
till-opensource.name, if you want to open a new
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 08:41:49PM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
I'm going to orphan glade2.
glade3 is the only actively maintained version of glade, and I don't see
a reason to keep glade2 around any longer.
You should probably retire glade2 if nobody rejects. For more
information look at
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 06:36:42PM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
SMP == Steven M Parrish tuxbr...@fedoraproject.org writes:
SMP Summary: A MSN Messenger Clone
Please don't build a package with this summary.
Please explain why.
Regards
Till
pgpkbPjcHnHO3.pgp
Description: PGP
On Fri July 24 2009, Jon Stanley wrote:
Log:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2009-07-24/fedora-meeting.2
009-07-24-16.59.log.html
17:01:18 jds2001 #topic No frozen rawhide proposal
17:01:22 jds2001 .fesco 224
17:01:25 * jwb is here
17:01:41 * nirik goes to look over the page
On Sat July 18 2009, Caolán McNamara wrote:
FWIW I stuck my own dubious hacky little script I use to keep track of
the latest versions of packages I maintain, which include a lot of
painfully upstream sequenced packages at
http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/latestpackages/
if it helps anyone.
On Fri July 17 2009, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 07/16/2009 11:22 PM, Till Maas wrote:
It would be useful to have a dynamically generated webpage that shows
how close we are to upstream versions across different Fedora versions
similar to the distrowatch packages page.
A static webpage
On Saturday 11 July 2009 13:29:59 Rakesh Pandit wrote:
Thanks for nice work. I too mailed other some time back .. but did not
recieved any mail back. May you share the program ;)
My current code is available at
http://fedorapeople.org/gitweb?p=till/public_git/cnucnu.git;a=summary
But don't be
On Tue July 14 2009, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
JK == Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com writes:
JK At 7000+ srpms there is no way I could evaluate each and every one
JK for validity before submitting it for a rebuild.
I think the point is that the package owner should have deleted it
from
On Tue July 14 2009, Josh Boyer wrote:
You have a valid point. I'm not sure if the cvs scripts or pkgdb can
currently cope with that though. If you have the time to look into it, I'm
sure it would be appreciated.
Do you know which script parses the cvs requests and generates the module(?)?
On Sat July 11 2009, Jon Stanley wrote:
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Till Maasopensou...@till.name wrote:
Probably and afaik the original author also planned to do so. Unluckily
the code that handled the bugzilla tickets is afaik not publicly
available, therefore this needs to be
On Mon July 13 2009, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
if su (instead of su -) is used, root will inherit user's environment
including PATH.
So why should a malicious user be able to change the contents of ~/bin, but
not set the variable PATH to an arbitrary value?
Regards
Till
signature.asc
On Sat July 11 2009, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Till Maas wrote:
mingw32-nsis2.44 207b0
Hmmm, the regex is somehow picking up something broken. The current version
is actually 2.45. I should probably make it read
http://nsis.sourceforge.net/Download instead.
In 2005
On Sat July 11 2009, Eric Sandeen wrote:
I wonder, can FEver become part of the Fedora infrastructure, so it's
not quite so bus-sensitive?
Probably and afaik the original author also planned to do so. Unluckily the
code that handled the bugzilla tickets is afaik not publicly available,
On Sat July 11 2009, Rakesh Pandit wrote:
Thanks for nice work. I too mailed other some time back .. but did not
recieved any mail back. May you share the program ;)
I'll share the program once I setup some repo for it, which will probably
happen the next time I spend a reasonable amount of
Aloas,
some of you added your packages to:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Using_FEver_to_track_upstream_changes
Unfortunately seems the original author of fever not to be around anymore,
e.g. his fedorapeople account is removed/backed-up. Therefore I started to
write a new framework to replace
On Thu July 9 2009, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
Perhaps I wasn't clear in my last post. You two need to take this
offlist, or simply let this thread stop by agreeing to disagree. This is
the last friendly warning I'm giving before triggering the hall
monitor/moderation policies.
Is the policy
On Thu July 9 2009, yersinia wrote:
But something one have to pay a security prize on not disabling it : it
render impossible to have a
centralizzated security integrity management (e.g. rfc.sf.net for example)
or one have to skip from check the prelink binary. Very bad i think.
You pay a
On Wed July 8 2009, Christoph Höger wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 08.07.2009, 17:41 +0300 schrieb Jussi Lehtola:
On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 09:30 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Christoph Höger on 07/08/2009 09:21 AM wrote:
how do I do that?
Since you have not submitted it for stable I do
On Tue July 7 2009, Jesse Keating wrote:
See above, should be how we do things now, group related updates into a
single bodhi submission, and attach the bugs/CVEs to that single
submission.
This may be disliked by upstream and others, because it creates bogus security
update notification
On Tue July 7 2009, Jesse Keating wrote:
Why was this update marked as security, but not bundled with the package
that actually had the security issue that you were rebuilding for? When
It was bundled with the packagate that had the security issue:
On Fri July 3 2009, John Poelstra wrote:
The logist...@lists.fedoraproject.org mailing list has been created to
meet the requirements discussed here:
http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/2009-July/msg0.htm
l
Imho announcement mails should not require someone to read some
On Mon July 6 2009, Christoph Höger wrote:
since I sync my mail with the experimental gnome ui of offlineimap, I
encounter a small problem:
How do I tell cron to only invoke the job when I am logged in under
gnome only? Since consolekit (correct me if I am wrong on that) does not
Do you
On Sun July 5 2009, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
There's been lots of previous discussion of this silly idea of
patching generated code. You end up carrying enormous patches
containing just line number changes that often can't be applied
upstream, and can't be carried forward to new upstream
On Thu July 2 2009, Kevin Kofler wrote:
It's also a hard decision where to draw the line: will you accept a PDF of
Jules Verne's Around the World in 80 Days (which is in the public domain)
as well? What exact criteria make Dive into Python OK and Around the World
in 80 Days not?
Dive into
On Sun June 28 2009, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
* Phone number is absent or obviously incorrect (e.g. 555-1212,
, 0)
Will I also loose my cla_done membership, once you notice that I removed my
phone number from FAS after I quit the contract for the telephone connection?
Or
On Thu June 4 2009, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 03.06.2009 21:28, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
http://www.leemhuis.info/files/fedora/answers-table.ods
Both updated with the answers from Dglimore.
He has been added twice to the ods table.
Regards,
Till
signature.asc
Description: This is a
On Fri June 5 2009, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
For things that are replacing actions, there is a certain amount of
obscuring being done. This is a barrier for entry for people who know
how to build software from upstream but don't know how to package. It
also can make debugging harder if
On Wed June 3 2009, Kevin Kofler wrote:
And I don't think we can make bug reports any easier, the point is that the
information is required, those complicated forms are there to request the
information we need.
I disagree:
On https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora there are
On Wed June 3 2009, James Laska wrote:
1. How did you find out about Fedora Test Days?
devel mailing list
2. Was sufficient documentation available to help you participate in a
Fedora Test Day? If not, what did you find missing or in need of
improvement?
Yes.
3. Did you encounter any
On Wed June 3 2009, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
I had planed to put them in the wiki as a table was well, but ran out of
time, sorry (²).
I tried to add such a table[0], but I failed to enable the horizotnal
scrollbar. I even enabled javascript for the wiki, but it still does not work.
Is this
On Thu May 28 2009, Jon Stanley wrote:
Well, I have nothing on the agenda for tomorrow's meeting at this
point. Thus, the entire meeting taking place at 17:00UTC in
#fedora-meeting will be an open floor, unless someone comes up with
something to discuss between now and then :).
There is a
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
