Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Directory draft (was Re: Triggers just to avoid unowned directories?)

2009-09-02 Thread Bill Nottingham
Toshio Kuratomi (a.bad...@gmail.com) said: Section 1.3 Optional functoinality is a special case of Section 1.5 Common directory without one requiring the other. I'd combine them like this: I've updated the proposal based on this and other feedback. And one more idea to throw out there: How

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Directory draft (was Re: Triggers just to avoid unowned directories?)

2009-09-02 Thread Kevin Kofler
Bill Nottingham wrote: 1) filesystem started out as just the FHS dirs Well, we could have filesystem with the FHS dirs and a new system-filesystem with the distro-specific ones. Kevin Kofler -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Directory draft (was Re: Triggers just to avoid unowned directories?)

2009-09-02 Thread Casey Dahlin
On 09/02/2009 03:27 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Bill Nottingham wrote: 1) filesystem started out as just the FHS dirs Well, we could have filesystem with the FHS dirs and a new system-filesystem with the distro-specific ones. Kevin Kofler That doesn't fix concerns 2 and 3 (snipped