Re: Broken dependencies with Fedora 11 updates-testing - 2009-11-11

2009-11-11 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 11/12/2009 01:05 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: The following packages in the repository suffer from broken dependencies: == The results in this summary consider Test Updates!

Re: Broken dependencies with Fedora 11 updates-testing - 2009-11-11

2009-11-11 Thread LinuxDonald
Am 11.11.2009 21:16, schrieb Rahul Sundaram: On 11/12/2009 01:05 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: The following packages in the repository suffer from broken dependencies: == The results in this summary consider Test Updates!

Re: Broken dependencies with Fedora 11 updates-testing - 2009-11-11

2009-11-11 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 21:52:50 +0100, LinuxDonald wrote: Am 11.11.2009 21:16, schrieb Rahul Sundaram: On 11/12/2009 01:05 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: The following packages in the repository suffer from broken dependencies:

Re: Broken dependencies with Fedora 11 updates-testing - 2009-11-11

2009-11-11 Thread Ian Weller
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 01:46:44AM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: On 11/12/2009 01:05 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: The following packages in the repository suffer from broken dependencies: == The results in this summary

Re: Broken dependencies with Fedora 11 updates-testing - 2009-11-11

2009-11-11 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:36:38 -0600, Ian wrote: Can someone give me a definitive answer on whether or not I need to rebuild tremulous and tremfusion with the new ABI? I'm willing to, I just need the confusion to go away. No need to. This was just the separate openal-soft package that is

Re: Broken dependencies with Fedora 11 updates-testing - 2009-11-11

2009-11-11 Thread LinuxDonald
Am 11.11.2009 22:39, schrieb Michael Schwendt: On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:36:38 -0600, Ian wrote: Can someone give me a definitive answer on whether or not I need to rebuild tremulous and tremfusion with the new ABI? I'm willing to, I just need the confusion to go away. No need to.