Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-12

2009-06-16 Thread Jesse Keating
On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 01:44 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > It worked until it was decided that having one volunteer is not fair (or > nobody wanted to do it, but the solution for that would be to have somebody > outside of FESCo sign up to follow the meetings and do the logs and > summaries) This ma

Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-12

2009-06-16 Thread Kevin Kofler
Martin Ebourne wrote: > Clearly the human volunteer idea didn't work. It was a shambles that > there were so many meetings with no minutes or even transcripts coming > out of them. Didn't look at all good for an open project. It worked until it was decided that having one volunteer is not fair (or

Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-12

2009-06-16 Thread Martin Ebourne
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 16:35:03 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> Could you expand on this? What part of it do you not like? How can we >> improve it? >> >> We have the source and the upstream maintainer has been very responsive >> so far, so hopefully we can enhance it to meet our

Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-12

2009-06-16 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 20:41:12 +0200 Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 16.06.2009 16:35, Seth Vidal wrote: ...snip... > > b/c it is a boring task and computers are made for that. > > +1 -- but at using the bot and adjusting and enhancing the stuff that > the bot output slightly might be worth the work

Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-12

2009-06-16 Thread Thorsten Leemhuis
On 16.06.2009 16:35, Seth Vidal wrote: > On Tue, 16 Jun 2009, Kevin Kofler wrote: >> Kevin Fenzi wrote: >>> Could you expand on this? What part of it do you not like? >>> How can we improve it? >>> >>> We have the source and the upstream maintainer has been very responsive >>> so far, so hopefully

Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-12

2009-06-16 Thread Seth Vidal
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009, Kevin Kofler wrote: Kevin Fenzi wrote: Could you expand on this? What part of it do you not like? How can we improve it? We have the source and the upstream maintainer has been very responsive so far, so hopefully we can enhance it to meet our needs. Why do we need thi

Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-12

2009-06-16 Thread Kevin Kofler
Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Could you expand on this? What part of it do you not like? > How can we improve it? > > We have the source and the upstream maintainer has been very responsive > so far, so hopefully we can enhance it to meet our needs. Why do we need this bot at all? All it takes is a human

Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-12

2009-06-15 Thread Thorsten Leemhuis
On 14.06.2009 20:22, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 12:09:19 +0200 > Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > >> On 12.06.2009 20:54, Jon Stanley wrote: >>> Here's the minutes and IRC log of today's FESCo meeting >>> Minutes: >>> http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/fedora-meeting/2009/fedora-meeting.2

Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-12

2009-06-14 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 12:09:19 +0200 Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 12.06.2009 20:54, Jon Stanley wrote: > > Here's the minutes and IRC log of today's FESCo meeting > > > > Minutes: > > http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/fedora-meeting/2009/fedora-meeting.2009-06-12-17.01.html > > Log: > > http://w

Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-12

2009-06-14 Thread Thorsten Leemhuis
On 12.06.2009 20:54, Jon Stanley wrote: > Here's the minutes and IRC log of today's FESCo meeting > > Minutes: > http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/fedora-meeting/2009/fedora-meeting.2009-06-12-17.01.html > Log: > http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/fedora-meeting/2009/fedora-meeting.2009-06-12-1

FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-12

2009-06-12 Thread Jon Stanley
Here's the minutes and IRC log of today's FESCo meeting Minutes: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/fedora-meeting/2009/fedora-meeting.2009-06-12-17.01.html Log: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/fedora-meeting/2009/fedora-meeting.2009-06-12-17.01.log.html -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fe