That was definitely informative. Thanks for the explanations.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Hi,
You can't expect everyone to change their software design to work
for
Fedora, even if it has disadvantages.
We do expect that, sorry. Bundling libraries is not a solution, fixing
the library not to break its ABI/API every couple days is.
Here I have to agree with you Kevin.
No, we should patch the broken packages to work with the current Mono.Cecil.
And upstream deserves a beating for this attitude. :-/ Why am I not
surprised this is coming from the M$-loving Mono community?
Shouldn't Fedora take upstream's design into account? It's their
software, after all.
Jud Craft wrote:
Shouldn't Fedora take upstream's design into account? It's their
software, after all.
It's our policy not to bundle system libraries. We're not the only ones,
Debian also has such a policy. Bundling libraries in applications sucks in a
distribution, the library which is part
