On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 01:51 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 07/28/2009 01:19 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 06:27:00PM -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote:
That means that you can take revisor, pungi or livecd-tools in your
existing Fedora system
None of these are what I am
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 01:41 +0200, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
On 07/27/2009 10:21 PM, Jeremy Katz wrote:
Regenerating the images is expensive -- it requires effort on the part
of the developers doing fixes, release engineering doing builds with the
fixes, QA testing the fixes, infrastructure
On 07/29/2009 08:03 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 01:51 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 07/28/2009 01:19 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 06:27:00PM -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote:
That means that you can take revisor, pungi or livecd-tools in your
existing
On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 12:39 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 07/29/2009 08:03 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 01:51 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 06:27:00PM -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote:
That means that you can take revisor, pungi or livecd-tools in your
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 16:41 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Jeremy Katz wrote:
Regenerating the images is expensive -- it requires effort on the part
of the developers doing fixes, release engineering doing builds with the
fixes, QA testing the fixes, infrastructure (mirrors) carrying a
to have updated Anaconda packages available within the
official repository as updates. If the Anaconda team doesn't want to do
it, hand over that work to Jeroen van Meeuwen. He has already
volunteered to take care of it and since he is doing it anyway for the
unity images, his work could benefit
. It is increasingly
becoming useful to have updated Anaconda packages available within the
official repository as updates. If the Anaconda team doesn't want to do
it, hand over that work to Jeroen van Meeuwen. He has already
volunteered to take care of it and since he is doing it anyway for the
unity images, his
On Monday, July 27 2009, Jeff Garzik said:
Honestly, I always thought Fedora install images should be regenerated
far more frequently.
I think back to my days as a Solaris sysadmin in the late 90's, where
ordering the latest media kit (CD-ROM) from Sun meant I got a fresh
installer,
Once upon a time, Jeff Garzik jgar...@pobox.com said:
I think back to my days as a Solaris sysadmin in the late 90's, where
ordering the latest media kit (CD-ROM) from Sun meant I got a fresh
installer, fresh kernel, and all recommended patches.
IIRC Sun only spun that a couple of times per
On 07/28/2009 03:14 AM, David Cantrell wrote:
I've been doing that for Jeroen. He's submitting patchsets for review and
I've built at least a few anaconda updates for him. He is currently
testing
updates for F-11 and when that's ready, he'll submit the patches for review
for anaconda and
On 07/27/2009 10:21 PM, Jeremy Katz wrote:
Regenerating the images is expensive -- it requires effort on the part
of the developers doing fixes, release engineering doing builds with the
fixes, QA testing the fixes, infrastructure (mirrors) carrying a
significant amount more bits[1], ...
Not
Once upon a time, Jeff Garzik jgar...@pobox.com said:
Chris Adams wrote:
IIRC Sun only spun that a couple of times per year though (at most maybe
once per quarter, but I don't remember it being that often).
Incorrect, for our shop at least. They regenerated every month, and
were dated
the distribution the
exact way we do! And as David said, he's been working with Jeroen for
occasional updated anaconda packages.
Jeremy
[1] And associated find bug/fix bug/respin cycle times
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora
OK, in which package can I find your mkimage script.
revisor ? livecd-tools ? pungi ?
Just pick the one you prefer :)
--
Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
(other) version of Fedora running
somewhere.
As it turns out, we ship all the tools to build the distribution the
exact way we do! And as David said, he's been working with Jeroen for
occasional updated anaconda packages.
Jeroen also kindly publishes those packages here:
http
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 12:14:08PM -1000, David Cantrell wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 07/28/2009 03:14 AM, David Cantrell wrote:
I've been doing that for Jeroen. He's submitting patchsets for review and
I've built at least a few anaconda updates for him. He
On 07/28/2009 12:14 AM, David Cantrell wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 07/28/2009 03:14 AM, David Cantrell wrote:
I've been doing that for Jeroen. He's submitting patchsets for review
and
I've built at least a few anaconda
On 07/27/2009 10:21 PM, Jeremy Katz wrote:
Regenerating the images is expensive -- it requires effort on the part
of the developers doing fixes, release engineering doing builds with the
fixes, QA testing the fixes, infrastructure (mirrors) carrying a
significant amount more bits[1], ...
Hey,
On 07/28/2009 04:49 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
http://www.kanarip.com/anaconda/
...is what you want, I think.
Yes but I want in the official repository as an update. Fedora 11
Anaconda has been troublesome for many people due to the storage layer
rewrite. It would have been nice to avoid that
On 07/28/2009 01:19 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 06:27:00PM -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote:
That means that you can take revisor, pungi or livecd-tools in your
existing Fedora system
None of these are what I am looking for.
Ralf
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
updated anaconda packages.
OK, in which package can I find your mkimage script.
You mean /usr/lib/anaconda-runtime/mk-images (from the anaconda package)?
Well, this seems close. Any documentation?
Ralf
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com
21 matches
Mail list logo
