On Sat, 2009-10-31 at 09:25 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
2009/10/31 Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to:
I am working on packaging pagedgeometry and I noticed that when building
on gcc it passes -msse which I am guessing says to use sse instructions.
I think that even in F12 we can't assume
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 09:43:30 -0500,
Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
Strictly, this is not true. Newer binutils has a feature called
indirect functions that lets you do (logically, this is not what the
syntax actually looks like):
Can you point us to some documentation on this?
Is
On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 08:49 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 09:43:30 -0500, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
Strictly, this is not true. Newer binutils has a feature called
indirect functions that lets you do (logically, this is not what the
syntax actually
2009/10/31 Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to:
I am working on packaging pagedgeometry and I noticed that when building
on gcc it passes -msse which I am guessing says to use sse instructions.
I think that even in F12 we can't assume these instructions are available.
The package may gain a lot of
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 09:25:30 +0100,
Nicolas Chauvet kwiz...@gmail.com wrote:
-msse is fine for x86_64 and ia64 by default (but not for non-intel arches).
The only way to have sse enabled on ix86 is for a library to be built
twice, the provides the sse version in %{_libdir}/sse2. The
On Sat, 2009-10-31 at 09:29 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
That is very useful information. It sounds like I will want to do this for
this package, since enabling sse2 will turn on the sse instructions and sse2
might turn out to be useful for this code as well.
Now I would really like to
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 09:33:13 -0700,
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, 2009-10-31 at 09:29 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
That is very useful information. It sounds like I will want to do this for
this package, since enabling sse2 will turn on the sse instructions and
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 09:33:13AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2009-10-31 at 09:29 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
That is very useful information. It sounds like I will want to do this for
this package, since enabling sse2 will turn on the sse instructions and sse2
might turn out
I am working on packaging pagedgeometry and I noticed that when building
on gcc it passes -msse which I am guessing says to use sse instructions.
I think that even in F12 we can't assume these instructions are available.
The package may gain a lot of benefit from using those instructions.
(I
On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 23:07 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
I am working on packaging pagedgeometry and I noticed that when building
on gcc it passes -msse which I am guessing says to use sse instructions.
I think that even in F12 we can't assume these instructions are available.
The package may
10 matches
Mail list logo
