On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 12:52:49PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
I suspect the problem with that is attempting to determine a universal
concept of 'offensive'. Heck, we might have no-offensive-packages-kde
that conflicts with 'gnome-*', and no-offensive-packages-gnome...
And you can't
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 12:58 -0400, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
And you can't uninstall KDE without killing gnome since
NetworkManager-gnome has a dependency on KDE...
Um, what? Care to elaborate?
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Eric Springer (erik...@gmail.com) said:
It's probably abusing the system and breaks a million guidelines, but what
about making a no-offensive-packages package that explicitly conflicts
with a list of offensive packages?
I suspect the problem with that is attempting to determine a universal
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 10:00:13AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 12:58 -0400, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
And you can't uninstall KDE without killing gnome since
NetworkManager-gnome has a dependency on KDE...
Um, what? Care to elaborate?
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 01:08:43PM -0400, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 10:00:13AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 12:58 -0400, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
And you can't uninstall KDE without killing gnome since
NetworkManager-gnome has a dependency on
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 06:22:04PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
IIUC, you're mis-interpreting the YUM output there. NetworkManager-gnome
doesn't have a dependancy on KDE, rather it happens to be part of the
KDE (K Desktop Environment) group. ie in doing a 'groupremove'
you explicitly
Darryl L. Pierce (dpie...@redhat.com) said:
You're correct in that removing the KDE group attempts to remove the
NetworkManager-gnome rpm. I remembered uninstalling KDE also removed
NetworkManager-gnome which borked my laptop until I re-installed the
RPM. That's something that should be
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 13:28 -0400, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 06:22:04PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
IIUC, you're mis-interpreting the YUM output there. NetworkManager-gnome
doesn't have a dependancy on KDE, rather it happens to be part of the
KDE (K Desktop
- Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 13:28 -0400, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 06:22:04PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
IIUC, you're mis-interpreting the YUM output there.
NetworkManager-gnome
doesn't have a dependancy on KDE,
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Darryl L. Pierce (dpie...@redhat.com) said:
You're correct in that removing the KDE group attempts to remove the
NetworkManager-gnome rpm. I remembered uninstalling KDE also removed
NetworkManager-gnome which borked my laptop until I re-installed
2009/10/21 Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com:
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 13:28 -0400, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 06:22:04PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
IIUC, you're mis-interpreting the YUM output there. NetworkManager-gnome
doesn't have a dependancy on KDE, rather it
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Steven James Drinnan ste...@scc.hkwrote:
Well any ideas, for me Package Kit would be the way to go. Then users
could add the packages or groups to the exclude list. Maybe an extra
password (optional) for parents / supervisors.
Or like was mentioned a way
Dne 19.10.2009 02:39, Ismael Olea napsal(a):
bibletime.i586 : BibleTime is an easy to use Bible study tool for KDE
gnomesword.i586 : GNOME-based Bible research tool
kio_sword.i586 : A lightweight frontend for the Sword Bible project for KDE
sword.i586 : Free Bible Software Project
2009/10/19 Josephine Tannhäuser josephine.tannhau...@googlemail.com:
2009/10/16 Steven James Drinnan ste...@scc.hk
I recently installed gestikk. And to my horror one of the dialogs said.
(Check Box) F*** off
No lie,
So how does one recommend that this be removed.
Steven
--
2009/10/19 Yaakov Nemoy loupgaroubl...@gmail.com
This is really a stupid thread.
Of course! But who is the stupid?
The one who started this thread or those who answered it or those who
wasting so much time to discuss about nonsense?
--
Josephine Fine Tannhäuser
2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586
--
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Josephine Tannhäuser
josephine.tannhau...@googlemail.com wrote:
btw. I'm still missing Godwin's Law. It's a must for stupid
nonsense-discussions, but I'm not missing it!
tongue place=cheek
So, you are acting clearly as a Nazi!
/tongue
--
Ismael Olea
OMG
Even 4chan is funnier than you
--
Josephine Fine Tannhäuser
2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
2009/10/19 Ismael Olea ism...@olea.org:
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Josephine Tannhäuser
josephine.tannhau...@googlemail.com wrote:
btw. I'm still missing Godwin's Law. It's a must for stupid
nonsense-discussions, but I'm not missing it!
tongue place=cheek
So, you are acting clearly
2009/10/19 Thomas Janssen thom...@fedoraproject.org
Well, this thread was disputable. But you crossed a line here. Some
idiots on this planet grab the same statement all the time when they
run out of arguments. This is not even acceptable as a tongue in the
cheek.
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 01:59:50PM +0200, Josephine Tannh?user wrote:
2009/10/19 Guido Grazioli guido.grazi...@gmail.com
Come on guys, let this thread die.
In other words, shut the
export YUM_I_LIKE_BAD_WORDS=1 yum -y install fuck
up ;-)
f.u.c.k.u.p. the computer of Hagbard
Dne 19.10.2009 13:27, Thomas Janssen napsal(a):
Well, this thread was disputable. But you crossed a line here. Some
idiots on this planet grab the same statement all the time when they
run out of arguments. This is not even acceptable as a tongue in the
cheek.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Offensive_Packages
hahaha! what a bad joke!
not only you advertise pornography packages
you give conclusions and according to which things you called
offensive packages made a pornography packages equivalent to
glorifying God (minbar package) how cheap
this
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Offensive_Packages
hahaha! what a bad joke!
This thread needs to stop, too.
If you wish to continue discussing it - please do so off-list.
Thank You,
-sv
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
On Mon, 2009-10-19 at 12:30 +0200, Josephine Tannhäuser wrote:
2009/10/16 Steven James Drinnan ste...@scc.hk
I recently installed gestikk. And to my horror one of the
dialogs said.
(Check Box) F*** off
No lie,
So
Wow this has really hit sore point, It just goes to show that there pro
and cons on both sides.
Like or not people want the ability to filter content that that deem
unfit.
Thats why I asked about it in the first place the concern was simple, I
have young children and I installed a screamingly
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Steven James Drinnan ste...@scc.hk wrote:
I recently installed gestikk. And to my horror one of the dialogs said.
Not sure if it's the best road to take, how ever I've created a page
in the wiki (that can be edited mercilessly or deleted if you think
it'll just
On Mon, 2009-10-19 at 09:35 +1000, Eric Springer wrote:
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Steven James Drinnan ste...@scc.hk wrote:
I recently installed gestikk. And to my horror one of the dialogs said.
Not sure if it's the best road to take, how ever I've created a page
in the wiki (that
Maybe this could be added as a feature in future releases - there may
not be many packages that need to be added but it would give a big group
of users some peace of mind.
IMHO if this kind of feature is accepted would be needed to do in other
cases, for example about religion. In a fast
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Ismael Olea ism...@olea.org wrote:
My 0.02€
More like your troll-cents. Despite the absurdity (of this whole
thing, in fact) I've added a category and included it. And people can
make up their own minds.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
I will file a ticket.
But my point was the image of Fedora.Does Fedora want be associated with
software vendors that use this type of language?
Steven
On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 07:31 +0200, Haïkel Guémar wrote:
Le 16/10/2009 06:58, Steven James Drinnan a écrit :
I recently installed gestikk.
I will file a ticket.
But my point was the image of Fedora.Does Fedora want be associated with
software vendors that use this type of language?
Steven
On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 07:31 +0200, Haïkel Guémar wrote:
Le 16/10/2009 06:58, Steven James Drinnan a écrit :
I recently installed gestikk.
On 10/16/2009 12:09 PM, Steven James Drinnan wrote:
I will file a ticket.
But my point was the image of Fedora.Does Fedora want be associated with
software vendors that use this type of language?
They aren't usually vendors. They are usually just hobbyists. It would
be good to highlight
2009/10/16 Steven James Drinnan ste...@scc.hk:
I will file a ticket.
But my point was the image of Fedora.Does Fedora want be associated with
software vendors that use this type of language?
Please, disconnect yourself from the Internet asap, because it's full
of obscene videos, jokes,
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 10:48:24AM +0400, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
Please, disconnect yourself from the Internet asap, because it's full
of obscene videos, jokes, sexism and so on. And that's great!
Even if something is on the internet, this does not meant that it has a
place within the Fedora
2009/10/16 Till Maas opensou...@till.name:
You may also want to think about whether you really find it great that
there's sexism on the internet, because you might have confused it with
sexual content.
No, I meant sexism. I thought, that sexism is modern trend nowadays,
since almost every
On 10/16/2009 02:29 PM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
You see, I personally prefer to live in the society with some level of
aggressively thinking and speaking minorities, rather than in dark
ages of censorship, brainwashing and hypocrisy.
You seem to be equating aggressive thinking with sexism and
2009/10/16 Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org:
On 10/16/2009 02:29 PM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
You see, I personally prefer to live in the society with some level of
aggressively thinking and speaking minorities, rather than in dark
ages of censorship, brainwashing and hypocrisy.
You
On 10/16/2009 02:40 PM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
Civil and decent behavior is to be tolerant to others, right? So,
please, be tolerant to sexists/racists/multiple other-ists.
Quite the opposite. You are really confused about what being civil and
decent actually means. If someone is being sexist
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 01:10:09PM +0400, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
2009/10/16 Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org:
On 10/16/2009 02:29 PM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
You see, I personally prefer to live in the society with some level of
aggressively thinking and speaking minorities, rather
Steven James Drinnan (ste...@scc.hk) said:
I will file a ticket.
But my point was the image of Fedora.Does Fedora want be associated with
software vendors that use this type of language?
There are worse things in the package collection, alas, depending on your
point of view.
In any case,
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 12:58:39PM +0800, Steven James Drinnan wrote:
I recently installed gestikk. And to my horror one of the dialogs said.
(Check Box) F*** off
No lie,
So how does one recommend that this be removed.
What we'll probably do is patch the code to have a less obscene
Steven James Drinnan wrote:
But my point was the image of Fedora.Does Fedora want be associated with
software vendors that use this type of language?
Why the fuck would we not? Is there something fucking wrong with the word
fuck? Let's just fucking stop this fucking politically correct
On Fri, 16 Oct 2009, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Steven James Drinnan wrote:
But my point was the image of Fedora.Does Fedora want be associated with
software vendors that use this type of language?
Why the fuck would we not? Is there something fucking wrong with the word
fuck? Let's just fucking
Le 16/10/2009 19:19, Toshio Kuratomi a écrit :
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 12:58:39PM +0800, Steven James Drinnan wrote:
I recently installed gestikk. And to my horror one of the dialogs said.
(Check Box) F*** off
No lie,
So how does one recommend that this be removed.
What we'll probably
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com wrote:
It's not really that offensive (sexist, racist, homophobic etc...), it's
not installed by default so it won't hurt our image. Anyone offended
should go complain to upstream, Fedora maintainers have no time to waste
2009/10/16 Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com:
Le 16/10/2009 19:19, Toshio Kuratomi a écrit :
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 12:58:39PM +0800, Steven James Drinnan wrote:
I recently installed gestikk. And to my horror one of the dialogs said.
(Check Box) F*** off
I recently came accross Gnaughty
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 10:29:46PM +0200, Haïkel Guémar wrote:
Le 16/10/2009 19:19, Toshio Kuratomi a écrit :
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 12:58:39PM +0800, Steven James Drinnan wrote:
I recently installed gestikk. And to my horror one of the dialogs said.
(Check Box) F*** off
No lie,
Is GPL really a way to freely censor a developer work, as in this case?
If it were closed source, you wouldn't had the right to do that.
That string is more stupid than offensive; and the escalation found here,
starting from the word fuck to things like sexism, racism and tolerance
probably was
On Sat, 2009-10-17 at 01:09 +0200, Guido Grazioli wrote:
Is GPL really a way to freely censor a developer work, as in this
case?
If it were closed source, you wouldn't had the right to do that.
That string is more stupid than offensive; and the escalation found
There are people who find
2009/10/17 Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com
On Sat, 2009-10-17 at 01:09 +0200, Guido Grazioli wrote:
Is GPL really a way to freely censor a developer work, as in this
case?
If it were closed source, you wouldn't had the right to do that.
That string is more stupid than offensive;
On 10/17/2009 06:58 AM, Guido Grazioli wrote:
My question was, would you call that patch a bugfix, or enhancement?
Or it is just like the beep over a bad word on tv, and by all means you can
do that thanks to gpl?
In this case, since the wording has already been fixed upstream, it
would be a
On Sat, 2009-10-17 at 03:28 +0200, Guido Grazioli wrote:
I didnt say i find profanity not offensive; also, i strongly agree
with your
point (*when* wouldnt profanity be considered gratuitous?).
My question was, would you call that patch a bugfix, or
enhancement?
Or it is just like the
I recently installed gestikk. And to my horror one of the dialogs said.
(Check Box) F*** off
No lie,
So how does one recommend that this be removed.
Steven
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
Le 16/10/2009 06:58, Steven James Drinnan a écrit :
I recently installed gestikk. And to my horror one of the dialogs said.
(Check Box) F*** off
No lie,
So how does one recommend that this be removed.
Steven
File a ticket upstream.
The string itself is in the .glade file, since
54 matches
Mail list logo
