On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 03:24:30PM +0200, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
Review requst for compat-readline5:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510022
After the package is accepted, I'll start patching the packages
(except gnu-smalltalk and kdeedu) to build correctly with the compat
On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 01:14 +0200, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 12:27 +0200, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
devtodo-0.1.20-3.fc12
I maintain this package in Fedora. Just wrote the author asking for a
clarification on licensing.
FYI, I got this reply:
Forwarded Message
On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 12:27 +0200, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
devtodo-0.1.20-3.fc12
I maintain this package in Fedora. Just wrote the author asking for a
clarification on licensing.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/
--
On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 05:55:21PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Miroslav Lichvar (mlich...@redhat.com) said:
I'd like to update readline to the latest version 6.0. The problem is
that the license was changed to GPLv3+ and we have some GPLv2 packages
using readline.
A possible
On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 02:48:47PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
kdeedu-4.2.95-1.fc12
kdeedu only uses readline in KAlgebra which is GPLv2+ (and only in the
command-line version (calgebra) at that), so no problems there. (I also
verified that calgebra doesn't use any
Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 02:48:47PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
kdeedu-4.2.95-1.fc12
kdeedu only uses readline in KAlgebra which is GPLv2+ (and only in the
command-line version (calgebra) at that), so no problems there. (I also
verified that
On Sat, Jul 04, 2009 at 04:10:15PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Those applications are obsolete by definition.
Such a sentence doesn't make sense. As long as there are users and
maintainers for those applications they are not obsolete.
I personnally use xfig, xpdf, gv, grace, and I am far from
On Fri, 3 Jul 2009 12:27:47 +0200, you wrote:
gnu-smalltalk-3.1-5.fc12
I have revisited this package for a license check and changed the
license tag to GPLv2+ with exceptions
Best Regards:
Jochen Schmitt
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
Matej Cepl wrote:
Ralf Corsepius, Fri, 03 Jul 2009 21:29:46 +0200:
I thought, we banned all non-utf-8 aware packages?
I agree, who needs grep after all :)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=194471
/kidding
That package WORKS with UTF-8, it's just very slow with it on some extreme
Matej Cepl wrote:
Ralf Corsepius, Fri, 03 Jul 2009 21:29:46 +0200:
I thought, we banned all non-utf-8 aware packages?
And BTW zsh has been fixed not to corrupt non-ASCII filenames?
Bash FTW! :-p
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
I thought, we banned all non-utf-8 aware packages?
Unfortunately, a lot of that crap went in anyway because some reviewers just
don't care. I agree with you that it's a showstopper. Applications which
don't support UTF-8 WILL NOT WORK properly in Fedora's default locales.
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Kevin Koflerkevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Patrice Dumas wrote:
Certainly not. Many very useful package are not utf8 aware
Those packages need to be fixed. It is not acceptable that we ship
applications which don't work properly in our default locales. You can't
Ralf Corsepius, Fri, 03 Jul 2009 21:29:46 +0200:
I thought, we banned all non-utf-8 aware packages?
I agree, who needs grep after all :)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=194471
/kidding
Matěj
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
Ralf Corsepius, Fri, 03 Jul 2009 21:29:46 +0200:
I thought, we banned all non-utf-8 aware packages?
And BTW zsh has been fixed not to corrupt non-ASCII filenames?
Matěj
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
I'd like to update readline to the latest version 6.0. The problem is
that the license was changed to GPLv3+ and we have some GPLv2 packages
using readline.
A possible replacement is the editline library which provides a
compatible interface and is licensed under BSD, unfortunately it
doesn't
On 07/03/2009 03:57 PM, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
I'd like to update readline to the latest version 6.0. The problem is
that the license was changed to GPLv3+ and we have some GPLv2 packages
using readline.
A possible replacement is the editline library which provides a
compatible interface
On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 04:00:02PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 07/03/2009 03:57 PM, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
I'd like to update readline to the latest version 6.0. The problem is
that the license was changed to GPLv3+ and we have some GPLv2 packages
using readline.
A possible
Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
kdeedu-4.2.95-1.fc12
kdeedu only uses readline in KAlgebra which is GPLv2+ (and only in the
command-line version (calgebra) at that), so no problems there. (I also
verified that calgebra doesn't use any GPL v2 only libraries.)
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-devel-list
On 03/07/09 11:27, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
I'd like to update readline to the latest version 6.0. The problem is
that the license was changed to GPLv3+ and we have some GPLv2 packages
using readline.
A possible replacement is the editline library which provides a
compatible interface and is
On 07/03/2009 03:27 AM, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
I'd like to update readline to the latest version 6.0. The problem is
that the license was changed to GPLv3+ and we have some GPLv2 packages
using readline.
A possible replacement is the editline library which provides a
compatible interface
Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com writes:
On 07/03/2009 03:27 AM, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
I'd like to update readline to the latest version 6.0. The problem is
that the license was changed to GPLv3+ and we have some GPLv2 packages
using readline.
A possible replacement is the editline
Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
I'd like to update readline to the latest version 6.0. The problem is
that the license was changed to GPLv3+ and we have some GPLv2 packages
using readline.
A possible replacement is the editline library which provides a
compatible interface and is licensed under
Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
I'd like to update readline to the latest version 6.0. The problem is
that the license was changed to GPLv3+ and we have some GPLv2 packages
using readline.
A possible replacement is the editline library which provides a
compatible interface and is licensed under BSD,
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 9:29 PM, Ralf Corsepiusrc040...@freenet.de wrote:
Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
I'd like to update readline to the latest version 6.0. The problem is
that the license was changed to GPLv3+ and we have some GPLv2 packages
using readline.
A possible replacement is the
Miroslav Lichvar (mlich...@redhat.com) said:
I'd like to update readline to the latest version 6.0. The problem is
that the license was changed to GPLv3+ and we have some GPLv2 packages
using readline.
A possible replacement is the editline library which provides a
compatible interface and
Jussi Lehtola wrote:
Quoting Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de:
drago01 wrote:
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 9:29 PM, Ralf Corsepiusrc040...@freenet.de
wrote:
Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
A possible replacement is the editline library which provides a
compatible interface and is licensed under BSD,
On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 12:27 +0200, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
bti-015-1.fc11
lvm2-2.02.48-1.fc12
I mailed Greg and Alasdair about these just so they know.
Jon.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
27 matches
Mail list logo
