Josephine Tannhäuser wrote:
2009/11/2 Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com
We don't do jumps to the next major GNOME version within a released
Fedora, that would be incompatible with our understanding of a released
product.
I hope the KDE-sig will take up this stance on her own
This is unfortunately not actually a helpful topic, but I am deathly curious.
Will GNOME be stuck at 2.26 for the rest of the F11 cycle? Or are
updates in the works, just not ready yet?
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Jud Craft craft...@gmail.com wrote:
This is unfortunately not actually a helpful topic, but I am deathly curious.
Will GNOME be stuck at 2.26 for the rest of the F11 cycle? Or are
updates in the works, just not ready yet?
Normally, the GNOME team normally
On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 16:44 -0500, Jud Craft wrote:
This is unfortunately not actually a helpful topic, but I am deathly curious.
Will GNOME be stuck at 2.26 for the rest of the F11 cycle? Or are
updates in the works, just not ready yet?
We've updated GNOME in F11 to 2.26.3.
We don't do
@Judd, wait for the F12 release, it's the best 'update' and it is not ready
yet!
I hope so. I'm not sure anything can top Fedora 8. Hard to explain
how much I enjoyed that distribution.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
2009/11/3 Jud Craft craft...@gmail.com
I hope so. I'm not sure anything can top Fedora 8. Hard to explain
how much I enjoyed that distribution.
mmh, the Gnome Desktop Live CD of F12 is really more gnomish since the CDs
before.
No qt, no openoffice, abiword
gnumeric is still missing and
