On 10/13/2009 11:28 AM, Christopher Aillon wrote:
The changes were not expected. Actually, the fact that TB3 is still in
beta was not expected, since it was supposed to be released as a final
within a week of FF35. Clearly, things haven't been going as planned
for upstream and that's had
On 10/13/2009 01:58 AM, Christopher Aillon wrote:
On 10/11/2009 09:46 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 10/11/2009 10:03 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
I do use TB (read my email headers). I fully understood that TB 3.0 was
in beta and could drastically change at any moment. I keep track of
their
On 10/13/2009 06:49 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 21:01 +0100, Richard Fearn wrote:
Hi,
Totem isn't using python-gdata anymore, so I'm orphaning it.
Feel free to pick it up at:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/python-gdata
As I'm currently using this
On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 23:05 +0200, Joshua C. wrote:
2009/10/5 Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com:
On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 19:19 +0200, Joshua C. wrote:
(gdb) bt
#0 0x003cc3cd70b3 in __select_nocancel () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#1 0x004e615a in WaitForSomething (
I received the following from upstream. Anyone know the answer to the
question (how do freetype-config, etc workaround this issue?)
In article 200910092117.36851.ndbeck...@gmail.com, Neal Becker
ndbeck...@gmail.com writes:
I maintain libotf for Fedora.
Thank you very much for that work!
Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com writes:
I received the following from upstream. Anyone know the answer to the
question (how do freetype-config, etc workaround this issue?)
freetype-config is just a wrapper around pkg-config.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com
GPG Key
Compose started at Tue Oct 13 06:15:09 UTC 2009
Broken deps for i386
--
sugar-toolkit-0.86.0-1.fc12.i686 requires python-json
Broken deps for x86_64
--
2009/10/12 Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com:
I've been a comaintainer of the python-setuptools package for a long time
and recently became the owner when icon relinquished it. It is currently a
tumultuous time for distributing python modules with a new and active
maintainer for distutils
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 07:10:06AM -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
As far as I know, there's none. So, it's ok to remove
libotf-config. But, why does libotf-config don't work with
multilib? How do the other XXX-config programs
(e.g. freetype-config, fribidi-config, gtk-config, ...) work
with
On 10/12/2009 03:39 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Hi Marcela,
Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
Modified Files:
libid3tag.spec
Log Message:
* Mon Oct 12 2009 Marcela Mašláňovámmasl...@redhat.com - 0.15.1b-10
- rebuilt of package with correct licence
[...]
-License:GPLv2+
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 06:25:24PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at
wrote:
Rawhide Report wrote:
Removed package python-json
Why was this
2009/10/13 Rodd Clarkson r...@clarkson.id.au:
On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 23:05 +0200, Joshua C. wrote:
2009/10/5 Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com:
On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 19:19 +0200, Joshua C. wrote:
(gdb) bt
#0 0x003cc3cd70b3 in __select_nocancel () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#1
Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
I'm really sorry. I went through reviews of many packages with
script, which has many false positives. Your package was perfectly
okay as it was before.
:) No worries, I'm glad I asked. Will you handle reverting this
change or shall I? It wasn't ever built, just
On 10/12/2009 11:43 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
On 10/13/2009 01:58 AM, Christopher Aillon wrote:
On 10/11/2009 09:46 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 10/11/2009 10:03 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
I do use TB (read my email headers). I fully understood that TB 3.0 was
in beta and could drastically
On 10/12/2009 11:18 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 10/13/2009 11:28 AM, Christopher Aillon wrote:
The changes were not expected. Actually, the fact that TB3 is still in
beta was not expected, since it was supposed to be released as a final
within a week of FF35. Clearly, things haven't been
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 23:56 -0400, James Antill wrote:
On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 09:19 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
The thing with doing updates for F11 is the regression rate due to
lack of QA, I put Mesa packages into updates-testing that fixed a
lot of r300/r500 bugs back at the start of F11
On 10/13/2009 03:29 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
I'm really sorry. I went through reviews of many packages with
script, which has many false positives. Your package was perfectly
okay as it was before.
:) No worries, I'm glad I asked. Will you handle reverting
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 12:52:30PM +0100, Mat Booth wrote:
I was unaware of all this. Is there a reason why the setuptools author
will not grant commit rights to others? Going solely on your email it
seems like a fork would be unnecessary if he was willing to share the
workload...
He
2009/10/13, Mat Booth fed...@matbooth.co.uk:
2009/10/12 Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com:
I've been a comaintainer of the python-setuptools package for a long time
and recently became the owner when icon relinquished it. It is currently
a
tumultuous time for distributing python modules
WHO IS CORSEPIU?
2009/10/13, GEORGIOS GIANNAKIS georgios.giannakis.stav...@gmail.com:
2009/10/13, Mat Booth fed...@matbooth.co.uk:
2009/10/12 Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com:
I've been a comaintainer of the python-setuptools package for a long
time
and recently became the owner when icon
2009/10/13, GEORGIOS GIANNAKIS georgios.giannakis.stav...@gmail.com:
WHO IS CORSEPIU?
2009/10/13, GEORGIOS GIANNAKIS georgios.giannakis.stav...@gmail.com:
2009/10/13, Mat Booth fed...@matbooth.co.uk:
2009/10/12 Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com:
I've been a comaintainer of the
This is a report of the weekly KDE-SIG-Meeting with a summary of the
topics that were discussed. If you want to add a comment please reply
to this email or add it to the related meeting page.
--
= Weekly KDE
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Adam Jackson a...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Author: ajax
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/libXres/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv12383
Modified Files:
.cvsignore libXres.spec sources
Log Message:
* Tue Oct 13 2009 Adam
Hi ,
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 9:21 PM, Adam Jackson a...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Author: ajax
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/libXt/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv10252
Modified Files:
.cvsignore libXt.spec sources
Log Message:
* Tue Oct 13 2009 Adam Jackson
Christopher Aillon caillon at redhat.com writes:
The UI change was obvious, but as it was upstream's decision, and we
follow upstream, didn't think much of it. In retrospect, we should have
considered undoing that change. We are looking into that now.
Not everyone had issues with the
On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 22:04 +0530, Parag N(पराग़) wrote:
-BuildRequires: pkgconfig
-BuildRequires: libX11-devel
-BuildRequires: libXext-devel
+BuildRequires: pkgconfig(xext)
%description
X-Resource is an extension that allows a client to query
@@ -21,7 +19,6 @@ the X server about
On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 22:18 +0530, Parag N(पराग़) wrote:
I am confused here. Why this is removed? I still see xt.pc needs
those Requires.
rpm now autogenerates the pkgconfig requirements,
both /usr/bin/pkg-config and also the pkgconfig(foo) level requirements.
Maybe the guidelines haven't
On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 22:18 +0530, Parag N(पराग़) wrote:
-# needed by xt.pc
-Requires: xorg-x11-proto-devel
-Requires: libX11-devel
-Requires: libSM-devel
-
I am confused here. Why this is removed? I still see xt.pc needs
those Requires.
Because rpm is smart enough to figure that
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 22:18 +0530, Parag N(पराग़) wrote:
I am confused here. Why this is removed? I still see xt.pc needs
those Requires.
rpm now autogenerates the pkgconfig requirements,
both /usr/bin/pkg-config and also the pkgconfig(foo) level
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 01:21:38PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
atropine:~% repoquery --whatprovides 'pkgconfig(xext)'
libXext-devel-0:1.0.99.4-3.fc12.i686
atropine:~% repoquery --requires libXext-devel | grep pkg
pkgconfig
pkgconfig(x11)
pkgconfig(xextproto)
So, whatever. Clearly the
On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 10:32 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
If all Fedora releases have the autoprovides but EL-5 is still
affected, the
draft can be as simple as: rpm detects pkgconfig dependencies in all
Fedora
releases, please move the pkgconfig requires from [LINK] to the EPEL
specific
Am Dienstag, den 13.10.2009, 10:21 -0700 schrieb Jesse Keating:
On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 22:18 +0530, Parag N(पराग़) wrote:
I am confused here. Why this is removed? I still see xt.pc needs
those Requires.
rpm now autogenerates the pkgconfig requirements,
both /usr/bin/pkg-config and also
Adam Jackson wrote, at 10/14/2009 03:20 AM +9:00:
On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 10:32 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
If all Fedora releases have the autoprovides but EL-5 is still
affected, the
draft can be as simple as: rpm detects pkgconfig dependencies in all
Fedora
releases, please move the
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 14:20:52 -0400, Adam wrote:
On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 10:32 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
If all Fedora releases have the autoprovides but EL-5 is still
affected, the
draft can be as simple as: rpm detects pkgconfig dependencies in all
Fedora
releases, please move the
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 11:15 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
On 10/11/2009 03:41 AM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
I don't think so. Not willing to put words in Jeff's mouth, but I don't
think he was discussing the UI changes of Thunderbird. I took it as he was
rather
discussing the upgrade
On 10/13/2009 07:40 PM, Christopher Aillon wrote:
No, because they didn't cause problems for us or anyone in testing, and
the changes were not expected to cause much of an issue. The UI change
was obvious, but we had no problem with it, and did not expect an uproar
over it. The indexer
Christoph Wickert wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 13.10.2009, 10:21 -0700 schrieb Jesse Keating:
On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 22:18 +0530, Parag N(पराग़) wrote:
I am confused here. Why this is removed? I still see xt.pc needs
those Requires.
rpm now autogenerates the pkgconfig requirements,
both
Rahul Sundaram sundaram at fedoraproject.org writes:
The general attitude in this thread (not you) and elsewhere that it was
ok to cause problems was worrying me. Thanks for looking into this problem.
Rahul
I am not sure that there is evidence for that! I think that some people were
Am Dienstag, den 13.10.2009, 14:42 -0500 schrieb Rex Dieter:
Christoph Wickert wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 13.10.2009, 10:21 -0700 schrieb Jesse Keating:
On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 22:18 +0530, Parag N(पराग़) wrote:
I am confused here. Why this is removed? I still see xt.pc needs
those
Hi,
I am really pleased to see how fast the cross-compile project has evolved,
and
I was able to create a very simple script to cross-compile mpg123:
http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/SPECS/cross-mingw-mpg123
However, I am more interested in cross-compiling opengl applications.
Any plans to provide
On 10/14/2009 01:44 AM, Mike Cloaked wrote:
Rahul Sundaram writes:
The general attitude in this thread (not you) and elsewhere that it was
ok to cause problems was worrying me. Thanks for looking into this problem.
Rahul
I am not sure that there is evidence for that!
Evidence for
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 11:50 PM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 10:32 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
If all Fedora releases have the autoprovides but EL-5 is still
affected, the
draft can be as simple as: rpm detects pkgconfig dependencies in all
Fedora
Author: corsepiu
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-HTTP-Server-Simple/F-11
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv12596/F-11
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-HTTP-Server-Simple.spec sources
Log Message:
* Tue Oct 13 2009 Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org - 0.41-1
-
Author: corsepiu
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-HTTP-Server-Simple/F-12
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv12596/F-12
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-HTTP-Server-Simple.spec sources
Log Message:
* Tue Oct 13 2009 Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org - 0.41-1
-
Author: corsepiu
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-HTTP-Server-Simple/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv12596/devel
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-HTTP-Server-Simple.spec sources
Log Message:
* Tue Oct 13 2009 Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org - 0.41-1
-
Author: corsepiu
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-HTTP-Server-Simple/F-10
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv12596/F-10
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-HTTP-Server-Simple.spec sources
Log Message:
* Tue Oct 13 2009 Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org - 0.41-1
-
Author: corsepiu
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Mason/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv18562/devel
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Mason.spec sources
Log Message:
* Tue Oct 13 2009 Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org -
Author: corsepiu
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Mason/F-12
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv18562/F-12
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Mason.spec sources
Log Message:
* Tue Oct 13 2009 Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org -
Author: corsepiu
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Mason/F-11
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv18562/F-11
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Mason.spec sources
Log Message:
* Tue Oct 13 2009 Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org -
Author: corsepiu
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Mason/F-10
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv18562/F-10
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Mason.spec sources
Log Message:
* Tue Oct 13 2009 Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org -
50 matches
Mail list logo
