On Friday 13 November 2009 00:38:21 Neal Becker wrote:
Was working, but after today's update:
pdflatex pll_freq_ramp.tex
This is pdfTeX, Version 3.1415926-1.40.10 (Web2C 2009)
kpathsea: Running mktexfmt pdflatex.fmt
I can't find the format file `pdflatex.fmt'!
I have been testing this on
Le jeudi 12 novembre 2009 à 21:25 -0600, Chris Adams a écrit :
Xaw and core fonts are not something new programs should use, but they
still work. Are they really a significant maintenance issue?
Core fonts are an issue for anyone working on X or Linux fonts. You may
think this year's big X11
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 4:48 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/bugs/libsndfile
What's up with libsndfile in Fedora and EPEL?
There are open tickets about CVEs filed in March.
There are additional
José Matos wrote:
On Friday 13 November 2009 00:38:21 Neal Becker wrote:
Was working, but after today's update:
pdflatex pll_freq_ramp.tex
This is pdfTeX, Version 3.1415926-1.40.10 (Web2C 2009)
kpathsea: Running mktexfmt pdflatex.fmt
I can't find the format file `pdflatex.fmt'!
I have
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net writes:
Le jeudi 12 novembre 2009 à 14:59 +0100, Andreas Schwab a écrit :
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net writes:
Therefore, I'd like to identify remaining core font users, and remind
them periodically their core font use is not good
Le vendredi 13 novembre 2009 à 09:55 +0100, Andreas Schwab a écrit :
I don't understand. Emacs uses the fallback for example to display
characters from the Korean KSC charset, in my case using
-daewoo-minco-medium-*-ksc5601.1987-0 fonts. What's the approved way
to do that?
You do it like
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net writes:
You do it like everyone else. You pass the codepoints to fontconfig
Emacs does that already AFAIK.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com
GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984E
And now for something
Hi,
On 11/13/2009 09:37 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 4:48 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/bugs/libsndfile
What's up with libsndfile in Fedora and EPEL?
There are open tickets
Le vendredi 13 novembre 2009 à 10:55 +0100, Andreas Schwab a écrit :
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net writes:
You do it like everyone else. You pass the codepoints to fontconfig
Emacs does that already AFAIK.
Then it has no actual need to the fallback path. It's probably only
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 01:11:03PM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Hi,
• grads grads-0:1.9b4-28.fc12
— /usr/bin/gradsc
— /usr/bin/gradsdods
— /usr/bin/gradshdf
— /usr/bin/gradsnc
— /usr/bin/gxtran
The X core fonts are used to draw custom widgets on the graphs. Maybe
using xft as
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 11:06:45AM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le vendredi 13 novembre 2009 à 10:55 +0100, Andreas Schwab a écrit :
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net writes:
You do it like everyone else. You pass the codepoints to fontconfig
Emacs does that already AFAIK.
Le vendredi 13 novembre 2009 à 11:09 +0100, Patrice Dumas a écrit :
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 11:06:45AM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le vendredi 13 novembre 2009 à 10:55 +0100, Andreas Schwab a écrit :
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net writes:
You do it like everyone else.
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 11:22:40AM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Well in that case you do not include the code for old unices in the
version built for modern unices such as Fedora
It is not always possible to distinguish whether the unix is old or
new at compile time. Maybe the Xft version
Le vendredi 13 novembre 2009 à 17:42 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit :
Here is a new filtered list, based on the suggestions I've received
since my first posting. Please tell me if there is still some files that
should not belong here, and why
I should have written that the test used in this
On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 09:35 -0500, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 11:27:28PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Toshio Kuratomi (a.bad...@gmail.com) said:
There are definitely workarounds available, but none that meet the
criteria for preupgrade as an effortless upgrade
2009/11/13 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net:
• xdvik-0:22.84.14-7.fc12
— /usr/bin/pxdvi-xaw3d
— /usr/bin/xdvi-xaw3d
A more crusty piece of code than xdvi you never did see. It's very
much in bugfix only mode upstream, so I very much doubt upstream, such
as it is, will be moving to
Le vendredi 13 novembre 2009 à 18:01 +, Jonathan Underwood a écrit :
2009/11/13 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net:
• xdvik-0:22.84.14-7.fc12
— /usr/bin/pxdvi-xaw3d
— /usr/bin/xdvi-xaw3d
A more crusty piece of code than xdvi you never did see. It's very
much in bugfix
On 11/10/2009 09:24 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 09:02 -0800, John Poelstra wrote:
My impressions from this meeting were slightly different :-)
We noted that there are no known reasons that we are not go and that
we will continue testing until Wednesday when QA expects to
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2009-11-13)
===
Meeting started by nirik at 17:00:01 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2009-11-13/fesco.2009-11-13-17.00.log.html
Meeting summary
On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 10:44 -0800, John Poelstra wrote:
Let's say all of these things next time and be clear about what our next
steps are. I will try to help with that. Re-reading the meeting log,
none of the things announced about going GOLD were said at the
meeting. The Go/No-Go
On Friday 13 November 2009, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le vendredi 13 novembre 2009 à 11:58 +, Richard W.M. Jones a écrit :
Nicolas, if possible next time please give the package maintainer
(ie. FAS username) next to each package in the list. Otherwise it's
harder to tell which packages I
Le vendredi 13 novembre 2009 à 21:08 +0200, Ville Skyttä a écrit :
On Friday 13 November 2009, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le vendredi 13 novembre 2009 à 11:58 +, Richard W.M. Jones a écrit :
Nicolas, if possible next time please give the package maintainer
(ie. FAS username) next to
Transaction Check Error:
file /usr/share/info/dir from install of texlive-kpathsea-
doc-2009-2.15842.fc12.noarch conflicts with file from package
info-4.13a-4.fc11.x86_64
file /usr/share/info/kpathsea.info.gz from install of texlive-kpathsea-
doc-2009-2.15842.fc12.noarch conflicts with file
Realized I should post this here, for transparency and all. Anybody is
welcome to join once we pick a time/place, but I would urge only those
that are willing to do some work come along. We'll summarize the output
for others who just wish to be informed.
Forwarded Message
Hi,
is it allowed to get new package into F-12 by standard make tag, make
build, make update workflow? Or rather should I file a ticket to FESCO,
since F-12 is in some freeze? I have my package approved and got CVS
module already[1]. It is my first time to push a package to frozen
branch.
Thanks
Is this the place where we talk about new features?
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Please click on the link below and enter your birthday for me. I am creating
a birthday calendar for myself. Don't worry, it'll take less than a minute
(and you don't have to enter your year of birth).
Spam? o.O
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
On 11/13/2009 04:13 PM, Ikem Krueger wrote:
Please click on the link below and enter your birthday for me. I am
creating a birthday calendar for myself. Don't worry, it'll take less than
a minute (and you don't have to enter your year of birth).
Spam? o.O
Or he just loves us.
--CJD
Jesse Keating wrote:
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 16:09 -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
For heaven's sake, no!
Don't you realize this means a ton of *users* will start to bog down the
mirrors before the whole data set has propagated through the network?
I'm not sure what you're expecting, but
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 03:36:14PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I'm no fan of Python either, but there is a fairly simple JSON API to
the package database. eg:
wget -O ocaml.json
'https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/ocaml?tg_format=json'
which gave me a huge
On 09-11-13 16:13:20, Ikem Krueger wrote:
Please click on the link below and enter your birthday for me. I
am creating a birthday calendar for myself. Don't worry, it'll take
less than a minute (and you don't have to enter your year of birth).
Spam? o.O
Phishing.
--
Krzesimir Nowak wrote:
is it allowed to get new package into F-12 by standard make tag, make
build, make update workflow?
Yes, it's even the only way as it is no longer possible to get the package
into the F12 release itself (it's too late for that, the release is already
in the process of
On 11/14/2009 05:22 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
Jesse Keating wrote:
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 16:09 -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
For heaven's sake, no!
Don't you realize this means a ton of *users* will start to bog down the
mirrors before the whole data set has propagated through the network?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537138
--- Comment #11 from Yaakov Nemoy loupgaroubl...@gmail.com 2009-11-13
07:51:16 EDT ---
Follows is a list of the packages
Author: stevetraylen
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Event/EL-5
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv28249
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Event.spec sources
Log Message:
First EPEL5 build.
Index: .cvsignore
Author: stevetraylen
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Event/EL-4
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv32681
Modified Files:
perl-Event.spec sources
Log Message:
First EPEL4 version.
Index: perl-Event.spec
36 matches
Mail list logo
