On Sat, 2009-06-13 at 21:57 +0200, Robert Scheck wrote:
> Hello everbody,
>
> can somebody please explain me, why we've multilib wrappers for packages
> at non-multilib architectures such as arm, alpha, ia64 and sh?
>
> - http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/devel/gmp/gmp-mparam.h?view=co
> -
>
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:37:14 +0900, Mamoru Tasaka
wrote:
> Michael Schwendt wrote, at 06/15/2009 03:52 AM +9:00:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/472621
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/472622
>>
>> Reported in Nov 2008.
>>
>> Is it really that difficult to fix it?
>>
No, but I have not had the ti
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 18:20:09 +0200, Jeroen van Meeuwen
wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 08:37:41 -0700, Jesse Keating
> wrote:
>> On Sun, 2009-06-14 at 03:30 -0500, King InuYasha wrote:
>>> A script that takes the DVD image to produce the CD versions would
>>> basically
>>> require extracting the wh
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 14:34:37 -0700, Jesse Keating
wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-06-14 at 17:54 +0200, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
>>
>> If Fedora Unity's motivation to continue a service to the community -at
>> it's own expense, not yours- is holding you and the other teams hostage,
>> call S.W.A.T.
>
>
On 06/15/2009 11:15 AM, Jon Masters wrote:
>
> The only counterpoint I came up with was that of folks in parts of the
> world who don't have access to modern hardware and don't have broadband.
Yes but they prefer Live CD or regular DVD images usually. Magazines
tend to distribute DVD image. Conf
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 00:24 -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 01:09:52AM -0400, James Antill wrote:
> > On Sat, 2009-06-13 at 08:46 -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
> > > (Reposting to f-d-l from my blog post last night.
> > > http://domsch.com/blog/?p=85 includes a couple nice graphs to
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 01:09:52AM -0400, James Antill wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-06-13 at 08:46 -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
> > (Reposting to f-d-l from my blog post last night.
> > http://domsch.com/blog/?p=85 includes a couple nice graphs to help
> > illustrate.)
> >
> > CDs are Dead. Long live CDs.
>
On Sat, 2009-06-13 at 08:46 -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
> (Reposting to f-d-l from my blog post last night.
> http://domsch.com/blog/?p=85 includes a couple nice graphs to help
> illustrate.)
>
> CDs are Dead. Long live CDs.
>
> I was running some stats on the Fedora 11 release, and an interesting
Michael Schwendt wrote, at 06/15/2009 03:52 AM +9:00:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/472621
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/472622
Reported in Nov 2008.
Is it really that difficult to fix it?
Well, actually these two packages are _the same_ (currently
versions of rpms on Fedora are different, howev
Rex Dieter wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> Personally I don't use multilib wrappers on arches that don't need it;
>> I think not needing extra cases in the wrapper header outweighs the
>> added complexity in the specfile. But I'm not going to tell the gmp
>> maintainer he's wrong for doing it the o
Once upon a time, Jeremy Katz said:
> See the livecd-iso-to-pxeboot script, although it does place some
> (somewhat) different requirements on things.
AFAIK livecd-iso-to-pxeboot is useless for 32 bit, at least for the
standard Fedora LiveCD images. I think the kernel will only use an
initrd tha
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009, Mike McGrath wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 15.06.09 09:15, James Morris (jmor...@namei.org) wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On Sun, 14 Jun 2009, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > >
> > > > much broken. It's a bit like SELinux: it's one of the first f
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mon, 15.06.09 09:15, James Morris (jmor...@namei.org) wrote:
>
> >
> > On Sun, 14 Jun 2009, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> >
> > > much broken. It's a bit like SELinux: it's one of the first features
> > > most people disable.
> >
> > False.
> >
> >
On Sunday, June 14 2009, Jens Petersen said:
> - "Bill Nottingham" wrote:
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/YumLangpackPlugin
> >
> > My one concern with this is that the conditional stuff is also used
> > on the compose side when making LiveCDs, etc. We need to make sure that
>
On Sunday, June 14 2009, King InuYasha said:
> Also, maybe we should support PXE/network booting the Live version from
> mirrors or whatever with the advent of netbooks and other computers without
> an optical drive. While doing it via USB is preferable, it is not always
> possible. For example I h
On Saturday, June 13 2009, Jussi Lehtola said:
> On Sat, 2009-06-13 at 11:12 -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 07:04:12PM +0300, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
> > > Hmm, I'd want netboot.img back, since I normally use a USB stick to
> > > start the network install (OK, there is the possi
On Sun, 2009-06-14 at 14:23 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 6:45 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > I haven't done a graphical root login in the past 10 years probably and
> > on multiple distribution. Graphical root login is meaningless.
>
>
> Let me ask you a question as an example
- "Bill Nottingham" wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/YumLangpackPlugin
>
> My one concern with this is that the conditional stuff is also used
> on the compose side when making LiveCDs, etc. We need to make sure that
> still works somehow.
Right. (Though since F11 we have
On Sun, 2009-06-14 at 15:11 -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 10:45:09AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > > > * Samba (outbound) browsing requires firewall mods
> > > I don't know how Samba works, so forgive me if I say obvious stupidity,
> > > but shouldn't *client* work eve
On Sun, 14.06.09 16:11, Jeff Spaleta (jspal...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
> > Are you speaking of the same smolt that lists es1371 as most popular
> > sound card? i.e. a sound card that has been out of production since
> > about 10 years no
> That said, I agree the wheel group should be enabled with sudo, though
> I disagree that the initial install user should be automatically added
> to it.
>
> But then again, I hate sudo :P I do most scripting that requires root
> access via root logins directly with ssh and keys.
i completely ag
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> Are you speaking of the same smolt that lists es1371 as most popular
> sound card? i.e. a sound card that has been out of production since
> about 10 years now? Somehow I have serious doubts about the validity
> of the smolt data.
You mi
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> Are you speaking of the same smolt that lists es1371 as most popular
> sound card? i.e. a sound card that has been out of production since
> about 10 years now? Somehow I have serious doubts about the validity
> of the smolt data.
I've previously a
On Mon, 15.06.09 09:15, James Morris (jmor...@namei.org) wrote:
>
> On Sun, 14 Jun 2009, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
> > much broken. It's a bit like SELinux: it's one of the first features
> > most people disable.
>
> False.
>
> Most people leave SELinux enabled, according to the smolt stats
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> much broken. It's a bit like SELinux: it's one of the first features
> most people disable.
False.
Most people leave SELinux enabled, according to the smolt stats which have
been collecting since the F8 era.
> Fedora is the only big distro that
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 6:45 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> I haven't done a graphical root login in the past 10 years probably and
> on multiple distribution. Graphical root login is meaningless.
Let me ask you a question as an example to better define the
expectation on behavior that people have on wh
Leszek Matok writes:
>> a false feeling that the "non-privileged" account doesn't need the same
>> level of protection as the root account needs.
> The feeling isn't false - overtaking a root-run program is potentially more
> harmful to the system, other users and everyone in sight (root can har
Mike Cloaked wrote:
>In F11 the contents contain
>/var/named/chroot and within this directory are
>/dev containing file null, random and zero
>and /etc containing file localtime
>and nothing else.
This is surely a packing error since the bind-chroot package should
install the proper chrooted direc
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
>
>
> On Jun 14, 2009, at 1:30, King InuYasha wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 11:38 PM, Bradley Baetz <
> bba...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 14/06/09 04:53, Robert 'Bob' Jensen wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> - "Frank Murphy"< frankl...@gmail.com> wr
Richard Fearn writes:
>> Who says the first created user is root-equivalent?
>
> It wouldn't be root-equivalent. You have to explicitly use sudo, and
> enter your password when you do use it. It's not the same as a root
> prompt.
It is from a security person POV.
If an attacker compromises your
I'm planning on updating the python-decorator package from 2.3.x to
3.0.x. This update breaks API in:
1) Some python-2.6 specific functionality
2) Some seldom used idioms.
This update is necessary for python-repoze-what-pylons:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499486
a component of
There's approximately one week left to vote in the combined Fedora
elections. To cast your vote, visit:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/voting
For more information on the specific elections, visit this thread in
the archives for the fedora-advisory-board list:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fe
Have you ever wanted to give your perspective on how well the Fedora
development and release process works, but weren't sure where to do it?
Now you have the perfect opportunity! For Fedora 11 we are having a
project wide conference all to reflect on the good and not so good parts
of the Fedo
Once upon a time, Jesse Keating said:
> If there are those that require split media, I'd much prefer that we as
> a project produce and test the split media as part of our normal
> development cycle, and not do it as some after thought after it's too
> late to fix any problems found.
I agree with
On Sun, 2009-06-14 at 18:20 +0200, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
> If the Fedora Project considers to no longer release split CD media, would
> the Fedora Project then also consider allowing Fedora Unity (members) to
> continue servicing those that request or even require split CD media? If
> that is t
On Sun, 2009-06-14 at 17:54 +0200, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
>
> If Fedora Unity's motivation to continue a service to the community -at
> it's own expense, not yours- is holding you and the other teams hostage,
> call S.W.A.T.
If it was just Fedora Unity's expense that'd be one thing. But it's
Dnia 2009-06-14, o godz. 22:12:47
Krzysztof Halasa napisał(a):
> a false feeling that the "non-privileged" account doesn't need the same
> level of protection as the root account needs.
The feeling isn't false - overtaking a root-run program is potentially more
harmful to the system, other users
> Who says the first created user is root-equivalent?
It wouldn't be root-equivalent. You have to explicitly use sudo, and
enter your password when you do use it. It's not the same as a root
prompt.
In any case, I like Mathieu Bridon's idea of having a firstboot option.
Rich
--
fedora-devel-li
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 05:45:43PM +1000, Michael Fleming wrote:
> Ich bin ein secure user and you should be too. Logging in as root into
> X directly (or the console for that matter) is a *bad idea*.
Erm, logging as root on the console is a bad idea? _You've_ obviously
not got any machines runni
> I didn't say the wheel group was a nonsense or a problem. I was
> responding to Richard who wanted the line to be uncommented (harmless
> per se) AND the first user to be added to the wheel group by default.
I've since changed my mind :-)
> For example, a « add to the wheel group » checkbox in
inode0 writes:
> Actually, I am strongly against the way Fedora forces the creation of
> the first user without allowing the admin to set the uid/gid of the
> user. That is a different annoying issue.
Hmm... Does it?
I installed F11 (i386, with netinstall) recently and it didn't create
"normal"
Richard Fearn writes:
> But wouldn't it be nice if this line was uncommented by default, and
> firstboot added the first user to this group automatically?
Who says the first created user is root-equivalent?
--
Krzysztof Halasa
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
htt
Michael Fleming writes:
> With the likes of sudo / ConsoleKit / console-helper et. al you should
> never, ever need to run an extended session as root. Your day-to-day
> work can be done perfectly well as a standard non-privileged user, the
> applications that *need* root, especially in X, are ho
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 12:30:41PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> I keep wondering if we couldn't come up with something
> like a /etc/iptables.d/ type setup somehow that would work for these
> cases.
>
> In the case of a package that does not need any configuration done and
> only needs a firewall
On 06/15/2009 01:01 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> * some people dislike questions like "do you prefer Gnome or KDE" that
>> are/should be mostly irrelevant for Fedora as whole and the position the
>> candidate is nominated for
>
> It's pretty much relevant, we don't want GN
>
> If you don't want to use gnome-bluetooth and how it integrates with
> all other software and automates things then don't use it. Nobody
> forces you.
>
I didn't even mean using BT for any audio related tasks. I basically use BT
to transfer files back and forth from my cell phone. And gnome-blu
Le dimanche 14 juin 2009 à 20:08 +0200, Lennart Poettering a écrit :
> I still think that the current firewall situation on Fedora is pretty
> much broken. It's a bit like SELinux: it's one of the first features
> most people disable.
For the people I know disabling the firewall is very low under
Le dimanche 14 juin 2009 à 12:30 -0600, Kevin Fenzi a écrit :
> In the case of a package that does not need any configuration done and
> only needs a firewall rule to function, we could add a file in there to
> add it's rule.
Anything that does not include a way to signal the admin a hole was ju
2009/6/14 Richard Fearn :
>> # grep -n wheel /etc/sudoers
>> 81:## Allows people in group wheel to run all commands
>> 82:# %wheel ALL=(ALL) ALL
>> 85:# %wheel ALL=(ALL) NOPASSWD: ALL
>>
>> All you have to do is uncomment one line ;)
>
> That's exactly what I do, followed by:
>
On Sun, 14.06.09 22:25, Ahmed Kamal (email.ahmedka...@googlemail.com) wrote:
> Hi fedorians,
>
> Having spent more than a day trying to get Skype working smoothly with PA,
> and failing (cranky sound, or 100% CPU usage). Now I know Skype is closed
> crap that is using deprecated apis and it along
On 6/13/2009 10:19 PM, Charles Butterfield wrote:
> Okay, so I mostly love Fedora. However, here are 4 things that got by
> blood really, really boiling, so I thought I’d share my emotions. They
> are mostly policy issues, where I think you have gotten it very very wrong.
>
>
>
> Just install
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> * some people dislike questions like "do you prefer Gnome or KDE" that
> are/should be mostly irrelevant for Fedora as whole and the position the
> candidate is nominated for
It's pretty much relevant, we don't want GNOME bias all over the Fedora
governing bodies. For so
Hi fedorians,
Having spent more than a day trying to get Skype working smoothly with PA,
and failing (cranky sound, or 100% CPU usage). Now I know Skype is closed
crap that is using deprecated apis and it along with flash should be
sentenced to software hell, but at the end of the day I need to us
On Sun, 14.06.09 15:09, Chuck Anderson (c...@wpi.edu) wrote:
> > > I think this is actually a problem that needs solving. We have
> > > several network services that are either installed by default or
> > > might be expected to be part of a standard setup, but which don't
> > > work because of the
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 10:45:09AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > > * Samba (outbound) browsing requires firewall mods
> > I don't know how Samba works, so forgive me if I say obvious stupidity,
> > but shouldn't *client* work even behind closed firewall (like with any
> > other services like s
On Sun, 14.06.09 14:01, Bruno Wolff III (br...@wolff.to) wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 20:08:31 +0200,
> Lennart Poettering wrote:
> >
> > enabled by default, like we currently do. If an application cannot be
> > trusted then it should not be allowed to listen on a port by default
> > in
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 12:30:41PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 18:34:52 +0100
> Matthew Garrett wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 06:13:51PM +0200, Julian Aloofi wrote:
> >
> > > So, solving this is pretty easy, even for newbies. But I agree that
> > > the error message wi
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 20:08:31 +0200,
Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
> enabled by default, like we currently do. If an application cannot be
> trusted then it should not be allowed to listen on a port by default
> in the first place. A firewall is an extra layer of security that
> simply hides t
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 10:35:53AM +0200, Martin Sourada wrote:
> > * Samba (outbound) browsing requires firewall mods
> I don't know how Samba works, so forgive me if I say obvious stupidity,
> but shouldn't *client* work even behind closed firewall (like with any
> other services like ssh,
Hi!
Sorry, late answer:
On 05.06.2009 21:28, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 09:04:08PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> Sorry, was a bit busy over the past few days and didn't get around to
>> answer all mails.
>>
>> On 04.06.2009 00:30, Andreas Thienemann wrote:
>>> On Wed, 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/472621
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/472622
Reported in Nov 2008.
Is it really that difficult to fix it?
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 20:08:31 +0200
Lennart Poettering wrote:
> Gah. Allowing packages to pierce the firewall just makes the firewall
> redundant.
>
> I still think that the current firewall situation on Fedora is pretty
> much broken. It's a bit like SELinux: it's one of the first features
> mos
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 10:52:49AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 18:34:52 +0100
> >
> > I think this is actually a problem that needs solving. We have
> > several network services that are either installed by default or
> > might be expected to be part of a standard setup, b
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
> That said, I agree the wheel group should be enabled with sudo, though
> I disagree that the initial install user should be automatically added
> to it.
Should sudo be treated in this case any differently than su? I think
wheel should be eithe
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 18:34:52 +0100
Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 06:13:51PM +0200, Julian Aloofi wrote:
>
> > So, solving this is pretty easy, even for newbies. But I agree that
> > the error message will not help someone without advanced knowledge.
> > Although I think people
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 15:59:58 +0100
Richard Fearn wrote:
> > We have the "wheel" group which would fit the bill.
>
> Yeah, I always uncomment the %wheel line in sudoers and then add
> myself to that group.
>
> Hmmm, having looked at the Features guidelines I'm not sure if this
> warrants a featu
On 06/14/2009 08:17 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> running libmicro[1] microbenchmarks, sometimes some of
> them broke for no reason.
Fedora 11 x86_64 (64-bit)
--
«Allá muevan feroz guerra, ciegos reyes por un palmo más de tierra;
que yo aquí tengo por mío cuanto abarca el mar bravío, a quien
On Sun, 2009-06-14 at 10:52 -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 18:34:52 +0100
> >
> > I think this is actually a problem that needs solving. We have
> > several network services that are either installed by default or
> > might be expected to be part of a standard setup, but whic
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 12:09:19 +0200
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 12.06.2009 20:54, Jon Stanley wrote:
> > Here's the minutes and IRC log of today's FESCo meeting
> >
> > Minutes:
> > http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/fedora-meeting/2009/fedora-meeting.2009-06-12-17.01.html
> > Log:
> > http://w
hi,
running libmicro[1] microbenchmarks, sometimes some of
them broke for no reason.
running them again with $ export MALLOC_CHECK_=1 I got.
output:
*** glibc detected *** bin/malloc: free(): invalid pointer: 0x01b16e80
***
*** glibc detected *** bin/malloc: free(): invalid pointer: 0x00
On Sun, 14.06.09 18:34, Matthew Garrett (m...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > So, solving this is pretty easy, even for newbies. But I agree that the
> > error message will not help someone without advanced knowledge. Although
> > I think people running Samba generally will know where to look for the
> > p
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 19:49:01 +0200
drago01 wrote:
> If you need to login as root into X to "set up the system" you are
> doing something wrong.
yet you may need this to fix some earlier goof.
not allowing the root user to do what he wants/needs to do is
obnoxious in that sense; when you nee
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009, Lennart Poettering wrote:
The way it is done right now, you have a system that might give too
few permissions to some users. If that causes a problem, you'll notice
it, and you can correct it in a very simple way (uncomment one line
and add a user to a group).
However, if w
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 18:34:52 +0100
>
> I think this is actually a problem that needs solving. We have
> several network services that are either installed by default or
> might be expected to be part of a standard setup, but which don't
> work because of the default firewall rules. The Anaconda pe
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 7:41 PM, Petrus de
Calguarium wrote:
> Charles Butterfield wrote:
>
>>...
>
> Does it help if more people (dis)agree? I will add my voice.
>
> - I like a root login option, especially when first setting
> up the system, as it is helpful to do things as root. I
> consciously
Charles Butterfield wrote:
>...
Does it help if more people (dis)agree? I will add my voice.
- I like a root login option, especially when first setting
up the system, as it is helpful to do things as root. I
consciously choose to use root and realize that I MYSELF
could be exposing MY OWN co
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 06:13:51PM +0200, Julian Aloofi wrote:
> So, solving this is pretty easy, even for newbies. But I agree that the
> error message will not help someone without advanced knowledge. Although
> I think people running Samba generally will know where to look for the
> problem.
I
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 6:13 PM, Julian
Aloofi wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 14.06.2009, 17:10 +0200 schrieb Mathieu Bridon
>
>> Samba (outbound) browsing requires firewall mods
>
> So, solving this is pretty easy, even for newbies. But I agree that the
> error message will not help someone without adva
>> The way it is done right now, you have a system that might give too
>> few permissions to some users. If that causes a problem, you'll notice
>> it, and you can correct it in a very simple way (uncomment one line
>> and add a user to a group).
>>
>> However, if we change the default, you have a
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 14:58:36 + (UTC), "Robert 'Bob' Jensen"
wrote:
> - "King InuYasha" wrote:
>
>> A script that takes the DVD image to produce the CD versions would
>> basically require extracting the whole DVD image and then generating
>> new ISOs from that tree. Maybe mirrors could d
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 08:37:41 -0700, Jesse Keating
wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-06-14 at 03:30 -0500, King InuYasha wrote:
>> A script that takes the DVD image to produce the CD versions would
>> basically
>> require extracting the whole DVD image and then generating new ISOs from
>> that tree. Maybe mir
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
Hi,
from these tools only Gentoo looks to me to do the right thing - one has to do
a 3-files merge. Just having the old modified file and the new unmodified
files has no solution how to do the automatic merge = how to get the new
configuration file
Am Sonntag, den 14.06.2009, 17:10 +0200 schrieb Mathieu Bridon
> The way it is done right now, you have a system that might give too
> few permissions to some users. If that causes a problem, you'll notice
> it, and you can correct it in a very simple way (uncomment one line
> and add a user to a
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 04:24:24PM +0300, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
>Are we no longer generating deltarpms in Rawhide? Both the June 13 and
>June 14 composes no longer have the drpms directory.
No. Bill sent out an email saying they were temporarily turned off because
part of the compose involved w
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 07:52:04 -0700, Jesse wrote:
We are chasing a bug in the delta path that is making rawhide take
over 24 hours to compose. For now, no deltas.
Does the bug affect RPM Fusion, too?
is rpmfusion delta'ing 17000 pkgs? If not -
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
On Sun, 2009-06-14 at 07:52 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Jun 14, 2009, at 6:24, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
Are we no longer generating deltarpms in Rawhide? Both the June 13
and
June 14 composes no longer have the drpms directory.
Because of ban
On Sun, 14.06.09 17:10, Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) (boche...@fedoraproject.org)
wrote:
> Look at it the other way.
>
> The way it is done right now, you have a system that might give too
> few permissions to some users. If that causes a problem, you'll notice
> it, and you can correct it in a ver
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 15:34:19 +, Jesse Keating
wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-06-14 at 14:53 +, Robert 'Bob' Jensen wrote:
>>
>> I appreciate the clarification from you and Matt on the request. As
>> you know Jesse my, and Unity's, goal has been for a while has been to
>> get Fedora in to the hand
Original Message
Subject: google-gadgets
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 16:28:52 +0200
From: Eric Tanguy
Reply-To: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using
Fedora.
To: Community assistance, encouragement,and advice for using Fedora.
Crash bug (#499139) seem
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 05:10:14PM +0200, Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) wrote:
> However, if we change the default, you have a system that may be
> giving too much permissions to some users depending on your taste. And
> the worse part is that you (as an admin) might not even know it !
The semantics
On Sun, 2009-06-14 at 03:30 -0500, King InuYasha wrote:
> A script that takes the DVD image to produce the CD versions would basically
> require extracting the whole DVD image and then generating new ISOs from
> that tree. Maybe mirrors could do it if you want to save space on the main
> server or
On Sun, 2009-06-14 at 15:59 +0100, Richard Fearn wrote:
> > We have the "wheel" group which would fit the bill.
>
> Yeah, I always uncomment the %wheel line in sudoers and then add
> myself to that group.
>
> Hmmm, having looked at the Features guidelines I'm not sure if this
> warrants a feature
On Sun, 2009-06-14 at 14:53 +, Robert 'Bob' Jensen wrote:
>
> I appreciate the clarification from you and Matt on the request. As
> you know Jesse my, and Unity's, goal has been for a while has been to
> get Fedora in to the hands of as many people as possible with the
> least amount of "pain.
> The way it is done right now, you have a system that might give too
> few permissions to some users. If that causes a problem, you'll notice
> it, and you can correct it in a very simple way (uncomment one line
> and add a user to a group).
>
> However, if we change the default, you have a system
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 07:52:04 -0700, Jesse wrote:
> We are chasing a bug in the delta path that is making rawhide take
> over 24 hours to compose. For now, no deltas.
Does the bug affect RPM Fusion, too?
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mai
On 14/06/09 16:07, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
However I agree with you that samba is always a pain to setup on new
systems. I do not hate it, but I wish this had been made easier.
Logging into X as root? I can't comment on this as I didn't ever feel
the need to do that. I didn't know it was prevented
>> We have the "wheel" group which would fit the bill.
>
> Yeah, I always uncomment the %wheel line in sudoers and then add
> myself to that group.
>
> Hmmm, having looked at the Features guidelines I'm not sure if this
> warrants a feature page or not. It would only involve a change to the
> defau
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 10:19 PM, Charles Butterfield wrote:
> Okay, so I mostly love Fedora. However, here are 4 things that got by blood
> really, really boiling, so I thought I’d share my emotions. They are mostly
> policy issues, where I think you have gotten it very very wrong.
>
Do yoursel
On Sun, 2009-06-14 at 07:52 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
>
> On Jun 14, 2009, at 6:24, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
>
> > Are we no longer generating deltarpms in Rawhide? Both the June 13
> > and
> > June 14 composes no longer have the drpms directory.
> >
> > Because of bandwidth issues, on our sc
> We have the "wheel" group which would fit the bill.
Yeah, I always uncomment the %wheel line in sudoers and then add
myself to that group.
Hmmm, having looked at the Features guidelines I'm not sure if this
warrants a feature page or not. It would only involve a change to the
default sudoers fi
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
