I'm a new package maintainer, but I'll try dumpasn1 and id3v2
Regards,
Xia Shing
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 7:09 AM, Adam Miller wrote:
> I would like to take http_ping and pscan.
>
> -Adam
>
>
> --
> http://maxamillion.googlepages.com
> -
> (
Xavier Toth wrote:
> So I do a yum update, pickup a yum that isn't compatible with the
> original anaconda and then can no longer make installable DVD's. This
> is busted! If anaconda is dependent on a specific version of yum then
> it's Requires need to be equal to that version and not greater tha
Jim Meyering wrote:
> The silent-rules option makes it so build output by default
> no longer includes many compile/link/etc command invocations.
> Instead, you get very brief lines like these:
>
> ...
> CC tee.o
[etc.]
FWIW, that's what CMake does by default. (CMake's implementation is b
Xavier Toth wrote:
> So I do a yum update, pickup a yum that isn't compatible with the
> original anaconda and then can no longer make installable DVD's.
Depending on your exact requirements, the re-spins by the Fedora Unity project
may be able to help you: http://spins.fedoraunity.org/spins Th
Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 12:50 +0200, Ondřej Vašík wrote:
>> Mark McLoughlin wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 09:02 +0200, Ondřej Vašík wrote:
>> > > Owen Taylor wrote:
>> > > > I was rather surprised to see:
>> > > >
>> > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDOR
Paul Howarth wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Jul 2009 14:01:20 -0700
> "Philip A. Prindeville" wrote:
>
>
>> Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>>
>>> On Wednesday 01 July 2009 03:43:31 pm Philip A. Prindeville wrote:
>>>
>>>
I have an FC9 (updated) x86_64 install, and I just tried to pull
down
[Bug 509024] TypeError: doLoggingSetup() takes at most 5 arguments (6 given)
--- Comment #4 from Chris Lumens 2009-07-01
10:00:03 EDT ---
This is likely because you are using an updated yum but the original anaconda
for F10. We do not release updates for anaconda for older releases as it makes
l
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 01:43:31PM -0700, Philip A. Prindeville wrote:
>I have an FC9 (updated) x86_64 install, and I just tried to pull down
>proftpd.src from rawhide-source.
>
>I'm seeing the following:
>
>[phil...@builder SPECS]$ rpm -vv -i /tmp/proftpd-1.3.2-2.fc11.src.rpm
>D: == /
I would like to take http_ping and pscan.
-Adam
--
http://maxamillion.googlepages.com
-
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-
On Wed, 01 Jul 2009 14:01:20 -0700
"Philip A. Prindeville" wrote:
> Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > On Wednesday 01 July 2009 03:43:31 pm Philip A. Prindeville wrote:
> >
> >> I have an FC9 (updated) x86_64 install, and I just tried to pull
> >> down proftpd.src from rawhide-source.
> >>
> >> I'm se
Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Philip A. Prindeville wrote:
>
>> Grrr... that would cause all sorts of other things to be brought in.
>>
>> I just need to rebuild certain Rawhide or FC11 packages for FC9. Is
>> there an easy way to do this using mock?
>>
>> -Philip
>
> rpm -i --nomd5 blah.src.rpm
> rpmbu
Philip A. Prindeville wrote:
> Grrr... that would cause all sorts of other things to be brought in.
>
> I just need to rebuild certain Rawhide or FC11 packages for FC9. Is
> there an easy way to do this using mock?
>
> -Philip
rpm -i --nomd5 blah.src.rpm
rpmbuild -ba blah.spec
-Eric
--
fedo
Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 July 2009 03:43:31 pm Philip A. Prindeville wrote:
>
>> I have an FC9 (updated) x86_64 install, and I just tried to pull down
>> proftpd.src from rawhide-source.
>>
>> I'm seeing the following:
>>
>> [phil...@builder SPECS]$ rpm -vv -i /tmp/proftpd-1.3.2-2
On Wednesday 01 July 2009 03:43:31 pm Philip A. Prindeville wrote:
> I have an FC9 (updated) x86_64 install, and I just tried to pull down
> proftpd.src from rawhide-source.
>
> I'm seeing the following:
>
> [phil...@builder SPECS]$ rpm -vv -i /tmp/proftpd-1.3.2-2.fc11.src.rpm
> D: == /
I have an FC9 (updated) x86_64 install, and I just tried to pull down
proftpd.src from rawhide-source.
I'm seeing the following:
[phil...@builder SPECS]$ rpm -vv -i /tmp/proftpd-1.3.2-2.fc11.src.rpm
D: == /tmp/proftpd-1.3.2-2.fc11.src.rpm
D: Expected size: 2471936 = lead(96)+sig
Ville Skyttä wrote:
I have released ownership of the following packages I haven't used in a while
and don't feel like maintaining just for the fun of it. They're all simple,
very low maintenance ones, in good shape (no open bugs and otherwise), and up
to date with latest upstream versions.
d
I have released ownership of the following packages I haven't used in a while
and don't feel like maintaining just for the fun of it. They're all simple,
very low maintenance ones, in good shape (no open bugs and otherwise), and up
to date with latest upstream versions.
dumpasn1
freedroid
http
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:36:49 -0500
Mike Chambers wrote:
> Installed this kernel, and upon boot it panics. I can't find anything
> in any logs, as it seems to happen upon first start of boot (as in
> during the "quiet" part of boot) before the processes are started to
> come up.
>
If it's what
On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 14:19 -0400, Bill McGonigle wrote:
> On 07/01/2009 01:48 PM, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
> >
> > On Fedora we have kernels from the 2.6.27 and from the 2.6.28 series.
> > This means, that you have to create seperates kernel patch modules for
> > each kernel release which was submit
On 07/01/2009 01:48 PM, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
>
> On Fedora we have kernels from the 2.6.27 and from the 2.6.28 series.
> This means, that you have to create seperates kernel patch modules for
> each kernel release which was submitted for Fedora-10.
This is why I suggested it would be practical t
On 26-27 June 2009 a Linux wireless mini-summit was hosted by the
Fedora project as part of their FUDCon event in Berlin, Germany.
This event was attended by well over a dozen upstream Linux developers
representing various kernel wireless LAN drivers, kernel wireless
LAN infrastructure components,
Hello,
I noticed a bunch of mingw32*-debuginfo packages that contain only *.debug (no
sources, no build id) appeared in Rawhide. Is this how mingw32 debuginfo
packages are supposed to look like, or is the infrastructure for creating the
debuginfo packages not quite complete, or are these packa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 01.07.2009 18:44, schrieb Bill McGonigle:
> Because Fedora has several kernel update in the
>> lifetime, you have to create a ksplice kernelpatch for each
>> kernel release which is available on Fedora.
>
> Since you quoted my post with criteria to
On Wednesday 01 July 2009 18:22:52 Adam Jackson wrote:
> He can't, KDE doesn't support that yet.
>
> - ajax
Neither does gnome apparently: :-)
$ yum search sense-of-humor
Loaded plugins: dellsysidplugin2, presto, refresh-packagekit
Warning: No matches found for: sense-of-humor
No Matches found
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 10:40 AM, Paul Howarth wrote:
> On 30/06/09 21:52, Mat Booth wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I got this segfault trying to connect to the Microsoft VPN at work. [1]
>>
>> What should I raise a ticket against? NetworkManager, kernel, pptp,
>> none of the above?
>>
>> [1] http://mbooth.
On 07/01/2009 01:22 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 11:51 -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
>> On Wed, 1 Jul 2009, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>>> Seth Vidal wrote:
yum install system-autodeath
>>> That just turns off networking (so then how do you preupgrade from there?
>>> And it lets people
On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 11:51 -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Jul 2009, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Seth Vidal wrote:
> >> yum install system-autodeath
> >
> > That just turns off networking (so then how do you preupgrade from there?
> > And it lets people keep running their obsolete stuff forever i
On 06/30/2009 01:20 PM, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
> Am 30.06.2009 19:04, schrieb Bill McGonigle:
>> > ksplice updates are only available for:
>> >
>> > 1. kernels that have been the lastest kernel in the past two weeks
>> > 2. kernel updates that are remotely exploitable
>> > 3. kernel updates that rat
On 01/07/09 17:38, Bill McGonigle wrote:
On 06/30/2009 06:23 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
The average home user turns his/her computer off when going to sleep, so
he/she reboots at least once per day.
Unless they are into torrents\limewire, then it's 24/7.
Their is quite a lot of normal users in
On 06/30/2009 06:23 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> The average home user turns his/her computer off when going to sleep, so
> he/she reboots at least once per day.
Can we measure this? My anecdotal evidence says most home users walk
away from the computer and let the default power management settings
If your desktop doubles as a server, then no you don't turn off the
computer...
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Am 01.07.2009 17:48, schrieb Kevin Kofler:
> > Whose behavior? Turning the computer off completely definitel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 01.07.2009 17:48, schrieb Kevin Kofler:
> Whose behavior? Turning the computer off completely definitely
> saves more power than suspend to RAM and on some machines also
> suspend to disk (hibernate).
Yes, and this is the reason why a desktop user s
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Seth Vidal wrote:
yum install system-autodeath
That just turns off networking (so then how do you preupgrade from there?
And it lets people keep running their obsolete stuff forever in their
closet) and it has to be explicitly installed.
yum instal
Jochen Schmitt wrote:
> Am 01.07.2009 17:16, schrieb Kevin Kofler:
>> Those people must be trusting their hardware and software (drivers in
>> particular) a lot more than I do. ;-)
> This behaviour is not right in the time of climatic change.
Whose behavior? Turning the computer off completely de
Seth Vidal wrote:
> yum install system-autodeath
That just turns off networking (so then how do you preupgrade from there?
And it lets people keep running their obsolete stuff forever in their
closet) and it has to be explicitly installed.
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Nalin Dahyabhai wrote:
I worry that some of the people who run EOL releases don't even know
that they've taken on this burden, that a release going EOL means that
we're not doing this work any more, and that means that *they* have to
do the work. And I
Kevin Kofler wrote:
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
a) it will cause some moderate stir-up to those packages whose upstreams
are still abusing the autotools.
s/ab// ;-)
Why can't we just move to a better build system with higher focus on
backwards compatibility?
Because
a) the autotools are not as ba
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 01.07.2009 17:16, schrieb Kevin Kofler:
> Those people must be trusting their hardware and software (drivers in
> particular) a lot more than I do. ;-)
This behaviour is not right in the time of climatic change.
Running a system 7x24 hours make onl
Nalin Dahyabhai wrote:
> I worry that some of the people who run EOL releases don't even know
> that they've taken on this burden, that a release going EOL means that
> we're not doing this work any more, and that means that *they* have to
> do the work. And I worry that that's partly due to us no
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 11:52:20AM +0200, Stepan Kasal wrote:
> IOW, what's Fedora good for after its EOL? If it is a museum
> artifact, then I'm spoiling the game. If it is to be used in real
> life, then update to Automake 1.11 is beneficial for the developers
> using it and harmless for the no
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> a) it will cause some moderate stir-up to those packages whose upstreams
> are still abusing the autotools.
s/ab// ;-)
Why can't we just move to a better build system with higher focus on
backwards compatibility? (And FYI, I'm "against autotools" more than
I'm "for CMake".
Manually, sending to -devel list, while one to -announce sits for
moderation...
-
Up'ing to GraphicsMagick-1.3.x in rawhide, which involves an ABI break.
I'll take care of (re)building dependent apps, dvdauthor and koffice.
Issue tracked here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.co
Frank Schmitt wrote:
> I think most people hibernate or suspend when they go to sleep.
Those people must be trusting their hardware and software (drivers in
particular) a lot more than I do. ;-)
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redh
Stepan Kasal on 07/01/2009 05:05 AM wrote:
>
> I apologize for that. I got bored writing three-word nonsenses so I
> tried the null string. I will do better now when I know that it
> might be read by someone in certain cases.
>
Fedora 11 brings a PackageKit that actually promotes and accentuate
Jon Masters wrote:
> That's a load of . I'm not sure where you get this idea from -
> perhaps because it's not obvious how they might achieve structural
> updates and so you assume it cannot be done - but actually, they can
> handle most kinds of update. They achieve this with shadow data
> structu
Bill Nottingham wrote:
> 1) You argue that the name 'Desktop' makes people think that it contains
> *all possible desktops*.
I'm arguing that people will either think that or (more likely) that GNOME
is the only possible desktop (a misconception which the "featuring the
GNOME desktop" small print
Bill Nottingham wrote:
> 1) You argue that the name 'Desktop' makes people think that it contains
> *all possible desktops*.
I'm arguing that people will either think that or (more likely) that GNOME
is the only possible desktop (a misconception which the "featuring the
GNOME desktop" small print
Compose started at Wed Jul 1 06:15:04 UTC 2009
New package awesfx
Utility programs for the AWE32/Emu10k1 sound driver.
New package kdepim-runtime
KDE PIM Runtime Environment
New package miredo
Tunneling of IPv6 over UDP through NATs
New package perl-POE-Component-Server-Ba
I built libxklavier 4.0 in rawhide yesterday.
It changed api; the required change looks like this:
-xkl_config_registry_load (config_registry);
+xkl_config_registry_load (config_registry, FALSE);
Sorry for the late notice...
Here is a list of likely affected pac
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> Ondřej Vašík wrote:
> > Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 09:02 +0200, Ondřej Vašík wrote:
> >>> Owen Taylor wrote:
> I was rather surprised to see:
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-6661
> https://admin.fedorapr
Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 12:50 +0200, Ondřej Vašík wrote:
Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 09:02 +0200, Ondřej Vašík wrote:
Owen Taylor wrote:
I was rather surprised to see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-6661
https://admin.fedoraproj
On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 12:50 +0200, Ondřej Vašík wrote:
> Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 09:02 +0200, Ondřej Vašík wrote:
> > > Owen Taylor wrote:
> > > > I was rather surprised to see:
> > > >
> > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-6661
> > > > https://a
Stepan Kasal writes:
Hello,
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 06:58:39PM -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Kevin Kofler writes:
Some software may need the new version to build.
Then, they need to be patched so that they would get built for F9, or
they should not be built for F9 altogether.
I'm afraid
Ondřej Vašík wrote:
Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 09:02 +0200, Ondřej Vašík wrote:
Owen Taylor wrote:
I was rather surprised to see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-6661
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-6076
https://admin.fedorap
Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 09:02 +0200, Ondřej Vašík wrote:
> > Owen Taylor wrote:
> > > I was rather surprised to see:
> > >
> > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-6661
> > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-6076
> > > https://ad
Stepan Kasal wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 07:30:37AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Kevin Kofler wrote:
Some software may need the new version to build.
Very unlikely.
There are people using the new features, like Jim Mayering, the
coreutils maintainer, and others. Building checkout
On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 09:02 +0200, Ondřej Vašík wrote:
> Owen Taylor wrote:
> > I was rather surprised to see:
> >
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-6661
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-6076
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FED
Hello,
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 07:30:37AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Some software may need the new version to build.
>
> Very unlikely.
There are people using the new features, like Jim Mayering, the
coreutils maintainer, and others. Building checkouts or even
tarball
==
The results in this summary consider Test Updates!
==
Summary of broken packages (by src.rpm name):
beagle
f-spot
gauche-gl
gauche-gtk
gbr
Hello,
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 06:58:39PM -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Kevin Kofler writes:
>> Some software may need the new version to build.
>
> Then, they need to be patched so that they would get built for F9, or
> they should not be built for F9 altogether.
I'm afraid the answer shows y
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 08:24:53PM -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> why is there no update information about these builds? There is a big
> "Notes" box on bodhi which is there for a reason.
I apologize for that. I got bored writing three-word nonsenses so I
tried the null string. I will do bet
Mamoru Tasaka wrote, at 07/01/2009 04:29 PM +9:00:
> Hello:
>
> It seems that on koji newrepo tasks are all freezing:
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1444680
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1444681
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=14448
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 02:05:57PM -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
> In general automake hasn't had a very good track record of compatibility
> between 1.x and 1.y, though this has been getting better recently.
Yeah, there were some serious problems with the redisign in 2001.
Recently = since 1.8,
Ondřej Vašík wrote:
> Owen Taylor wrote:
>> I was rather surprised to see:
>>
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-6661
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-6076
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-6370
>>
>> Where the automake wa
On 30/06/09 21:52, Mat Booth wrote:
Hi,
I got this segfault trying to connect to the Microsoft VPN at work. [1]
What should I raise a ticket against? NetworkManager, kernel, pptp,
none of the above?
[1] http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/vpn-bug.txt
Looks like pptp to me; can you repeat the segf
On 01/07/09 00:22, inode0 wrote:
So if the community agreed to these two changes, which seem reasonable
to me, then what? Well, I think at this point we hit the real wall in
this debate, but I really don't think we can avoid the subsequent
requests for more equal treatment by refusing to call G
Hello:
It seems that on koji newrepo tasks are all freezing:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1444680
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1444681
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1444815
Would someone investigate what is occuring?
Regards,
Mamoru
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 1:44 AM, Frank Schmitt wrote:
> Kevin Kofler writes:
>
> > Bill McGonigle wrote:
> >> The parenthetical is the actual reason people don't like to reboot and
> >> may ignore security updates. Boot times are trivial in comparison to
> >> restoring one's application state, f
Owen Taylor wrote:
> I was rather surprised to see:
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-6661
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-6076
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-6370
>
> Where the automake was upgraded to 1.11 for F9,
69 matches
Mail list logo
