Hi,
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 02:38:30PM -0400, Michel Salim wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 14:44 +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > TeX Live 2009 pretest is now available via external repository for
> > testing in Fedora:
> >
> > rpm -Uhv
> > http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/texliv
On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 00:33 +0200, Laurent Rineau wrote:
> Since ipe-6.0pre32, the tool ipe5toxml is released as a separate tarball,
> upstream, whereas is was previously shipped in the ipe tarball (as in
> ipe-6.0pre30).
>
> I have updated Rawhide's ipe to 6.0pre32, but I do not know what to d
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 16:13 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > "AW" == Adam Williamson writes:
>
> AW> It was discussed at a recent packaging committee meeting (alongside
> AW> VDPAU) and they seemed quite keen to have it added.
>
> I believe you mean FESCo here.
Oh yeah, you're right.
On 08/20/2009 11:41 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On 08/20/2009 04:18 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:19:39AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
>>> Is it just me or are there some packages that seem to be eternally on
>>> this list? beage/f-spot/tomboy never seem to go anywhere.
>>
Apologies for the late agenda, I completely blanked out today :(. The
following are the topics for tomorrow's meeting at 17:00UTC on
#fedora-meeting on freenode:
244 Reconsider Moblin Feature for Fedora 12
238 Can libvdpau go in Fedora?
For more complete details, please visit each indivi
grabbed
jfsutils
co-maintaners welcome.
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:02 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> I've orphaned the following packages in pkgdb:
>
> gquilt
> quilt
> jfsutils
>
> josh
>
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fe
I've orphaned the following packages in pkgdb:
gquilt
quilt
jfsutils
josh
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 03:55:20PM -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
> Josh Boyer said the following on 08/20/2009 07:50 AM Pacific Time:
>> A general reminder. As we are out of Alpha freeze now, that means we are not
>> taking tag requests for F12 Alpha any longer. The package set for Alpha has
>> bee
Josh Boyer said the following on 08/20/2009 07:50 AM Pacific Time:
A general reminder. As we are out of Alpha freeze now, that means we are not
taking tag requests for F12 Alpha any longer. The package set for Alpha has
been finalized.
Thanks
josh
Does this mean the schedule should be upda
Since ipe-6.0pre32, the tool ipe5toxml is released as a separate tarball,
upstream, whereas is was previously shipped in the ipe tarball (as in
ipe-6.0pre30).
I have updated Rawhide's ipe to 6.0pre32, but I do not know what to do with
that tool that disappeared from the tarball.
Should I:
-
Dne 19.8.2009 21:48, Gérard Milmeister wrote:
Hi,
Since the SmartEiffel project is quite dead (it hasn't had any release
since June 2007) and I cannot get it to compile on any of the current
Fedora releases, I am orphaning it.
...just for the record: I remember trying the build to work after t
> "AW" == Adam Williamson writes:
AW> It was discussed at a recent packaging committee meeting (alongside
AW> VDPAU) and they seemed quite keen to have it added.
I believe you mean FESCo here.
- J<
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mail
On 08/21/2009 02:13 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I have submitted a libva package for review:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518546
>
> this is for VAAPI video playback acceleration. It's a freedesktop
> project which stands a reasonable chance of being the umbrella standard
> for h
I have submitted a libva package for review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518546
this is for VAAPI video playback acceleration. It's a freedesktop
project which stands a reasonable chance of being the umbrella standard
for hardware-accelerated video playback in future, so it's quite
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 21:10 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> It looks to me as if some people need to learn how to talk to eachother.
> Look at this!
>
> A big update package for Mono packages:
...
> Then on July 1st:
>
> This update has been obsoleted by tomboy-0.14.3-1.fc11
Indeed. David Nie
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 11:41 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On 08/20/2009 04:18 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:19:39AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> >> Is it just me or are there some packages that seem to be eternally on
> >> this list? beage/f-spot/tomboy never seem to g
It looks to me as if some people need to learn how to talk to eachother.
Look at this!
A big update package for Mono packages:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-6615
Date Released: 2009-06-18 11:01:34
gbrainy,
giver,
gnome-do,
mono-zeroconf,
ipod-sharp,
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 17:22 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I would like to add a group for the Moblin Desktop. My proposed patch
> is below and feedback is welcome.
>
> Cheers,
> Peter
>
> +
> + mutter
> + mutter-moblin
> +
Speaking of these two, any reason mutter-
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 13:37 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
>
>> I'm particularly interested in how far we can get the default Fedora
>> desktop's boot speed close to that of netbook experience, without
>> breaking compatibility with any of the
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 01:26:13PM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > "JLT" == Jason L Tibbitts writes:
>
> JLT> There are many, many more packages that require tetex-latex at
> JLT> build time. Notably every R package, most likely because of
> JLT> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packagin
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 13:37 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> I'm particularly interested in how far we can get the default Fedora
> desktop's boot speed close to that of netbook experience, without
> breaking compatibility with any of the corner cases people expect from
> a general purposes OS like R
On 08/20/2009 04:18 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:19:39AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> Is it just me or are there some packages that seem to be eternally on
>> this list? beage/f-spot/tomboy never seem to go anywhere.
>
> They're eternally broken on ppc64. Mostly due to M
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 13:37 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> > Depends on which bits you look at. Most of the packages are based on
> > Fedora packages, the whole lot is built using the suse build system.
> > The NM/connman is an interesting split. It seems suse is assisting the
> > process from the
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 14:44 +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> TeX Live 2009 pretest is now available via external repository for
> testing in Fedora:
>
> rpm -Uhv
> http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/texlive-release-2009-0.1.fc11.noarch.rpm
>
Any chance you could build this for Rawhide a
> "JLT" == Jason L Tibbitts writes:
JLT> There are many, many more packages that require tetex-latex at
JLT> build time. Notably every R package, most likely because of
JLT> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:R.
I have adjusted the guideline page to reference tex(latex), but I
believe
> "JN" == Jindrich Novy writes:
JN> These virtual provides, such as tex(tex), tex(latex) or tex(xetex)
JN> were added at the beginning of the year 2008 so it works at least
JN> for Fedora 9 and higher.
JN> We should file bugs for these packages.
There are many, many more packages that requir
Hi Norbert,
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 06:33:26PM +0200, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Hi Jindrich,
>
> On Thu, 20 Aug 2009, Jindrich Novy wrote:
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/TeXLive
>
> How do you handle installation of
> texlive-scheme-*
> since the schemes are overlapping? AFAIR
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 05:11:31PM +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
> 2009/8/20 Mary Ellen Foster :
> > 2009/8/20 Jindrich Novy :
> >>
> >> Maybe a good idea is to start directly with TeX Live 2009 in Fedora
> >> because TL 2008 has different package set and TL 2009 contains newest
> >> packages an
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> Eventually I plan on having a moblin spin but not for F-12. The work
> in Fedora at the moment is separate to anything that is coming from
> Moblin. The advantage that Fedora will have that at the moment
> upstream Moblin doesn't support an
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I would like to add a group for the Moblin Desktop. My proposed patch
>> is below and feedback is welcome.
>
> Peter, thanks for all your work on packaging stuff, it's re
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
>> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>> > Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
>> >> I would like to add a group for the Moblin Desktop. My proposed patch
>> >> is belo
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 17:22 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I would like to add a group for the Moblin Desktop. My proposed patch
>> is below and feedback is welcome.
>
> Is "Moblin" a trademark of anybody?
Intel has handed over
Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
> >> I would like to add a group for the Moblin Desktop. My proposed patch
> >> is below and feedback is welcome.
> >
> > ... this seems small. Ther
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I would like to add a group for the Moblin Desktop. My proposed patch
> is below and feedback is welcome.
Peter, thanks for all your work on packaging stuff, it's really great.
I appreciate the work on introspection and gnome-s
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
>> I would like to add a group for the Moblin Desktop. My proposed patch
>> is below and feedback is welcome.
>
> ... this seems small. There are no other apps required?
Yes there are. I haven't a
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 17:22 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I would like to add a group for the Moblin Desktop. My proposed patch
> is below and feedback is welcome.
Is "Moblin" a trademark of anybody?
If you're adding a group, be sure to add it to a category as well.
--
Jesse Keati
Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
> I would like to add a group for the Moblin Desktop. My proposed patch
> is below and feedback is welcome.
... this seems small. There are no other apps required?
You'd want an entry in the desktop category as well. Also, you want to
give the localiza
Hi All,
I would like to add a group for the Moblin Desktop. My proposed patch
is below and feedback is welcome.
Cheers,
Peter
--- comps-f12.xml.in.orig 2009-08-20 17:10:23.0 +0100
+++ comps-f12.xml.in2009-08-20 17:20:47.0 +0100
@@ -4235,6 +4235,17 @@
+
2009/8/20 Mary Ellen Foster :
> 2009/8/20 Jindrich Novy :
>>
>> Maybe a good idea is to start directly with TeX Live 2009 in Fedora
>> because TL 2008 has different package set and TL 2009 contains newest
>> packages and will likely be released this year. And before that we can
>> help with testing
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 03:48:00PM +0100, Mary Ellen Foster wrote:
> 2009/8/20 Mary Ellen Foster :
> > What's up with xetex? The package is named texlive-xetex.ARCH, and it
> > seems to depend on a package called "texlive-xetex" which isn't
> > provided in the new repository, and therefore pulls in
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 04:03:54PM +0200, Pavel Lisy wrote:
> Jindrich Novy píše v Čt 20. 08. 2009 v 14:44 +0200:
> > Hi,
> >
> > TeX Live 2009 pretest is now available via external repository for
> > testing in Fedora:
> >
> > rpm -Uhv
> > http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/texlive-release-2
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:20:54 -0500, Juan wrote:
> I maintain beagle, and although I did add the Excludes directive to it, the
> reason I haven't pushed the update is because it doesn't actually fix
> anything other than prevent that annoying email from being sent out.
Thanks for calling it "annoy
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:20:54 -0500, Juan wrote:
>
> > I maintain beagle, and although I did add the Excludes directive to it,
> the
> > reason I haven't pushed the update is because it doesn't actually fix
> > anything other than prevent
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 03:38:57PM +0100, Mary Ellen Foster wrote:
> 2009/8/20 Jindrich Novy :
> >
> > Thanks for noticing. I've tested only upgrade from texlive-2007
> > installation with no dvipdfmx installed. I'll fix it in the next
> > repo update.
>
> Another related upgrade issue: texlive-ps
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 04:48:49PM +0300, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 14:44 +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > TeX Live 2009 pretest is now available via external repository for
> > testing in Fedora:
> >
> > rpm -Uhv
> > http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/texlive-re
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 16:29 +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 03:53:06PM +0200, Martin Sourada wrote:
> Please be sure you remove all the old formats generated with the old
> TeX Live. In most cases clearing the /var/lib/texmf/ and ~/.texlive* contents
> should make it work.
>
2009/8/20 Jindrich Novy :
>
> Maybe a good idea is to start directly with TeX Live 2009 in Fedora
> because TL 2008 has different package set and TL 2009 contains newest
> packages and will likely be released this year. And before that we can
> help with testing :)
One more issue: some packages (l
A general reminder. As we are out of Alpha freeze now, that means we are not
taking tag requests for F12 Alpha any longer. The package set for Alpha has
been finalized.
Thanks
josh
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-de
2009/8/20 Mary Ellen Foster :
> What's up with xetex? The package is named texlive-xetex.ARCH, and it
> seems to depend on a package called "texlive-xetex" which isn't
> provided in the new repository, and therefore pulls in the whole old
> version of texlive from the core repository again ...
Sor
Once upon a time, Mary Ellen Foster said:
> Another related upgrade issue: texlive-psutils doesn't obsolete
> psutils ... (is there a better place to note this sort of thing?)
Why would texlive replace a stand-alone package (that has been around
forever as a stand-alone package)?
--
Chris Adams
Not much progress has been made on sage. Perhaps this can help:
http://code.google.com/p/spdproject/wiki/Installation
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
2009/8/20 Jindrich Novy :
>
> Thanks for noticing. I've tested only upgrade from texlive-2007
> installation with no dvipdfmx installed. I'll fix it in the next
> repo update.
Another related upgrade issue: texlive-psutils doesn't obsolete
psutils ... (is there a better place to note this sort of
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 03:40:46PM +0200, Martin Sourada wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 14:44 +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > TeX Live 2009 pretest is now available via external repository for
> > testing in Fedora:
> >
> > rpm -Uhv
> > http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/texlive-r
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 03:53:06PM +0200, Martin Sourada wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 15:40 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote:
> > progressed smoothly, haven't tried runtime yet (though, seeing that your
> So, just noticed I needed to install texlive-csplain in order to have
> it, but it does not work:
2009/8/20 Jindrich Novy :
> rpm -Uhv
> http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/texlive-release-2009-0.1.fc11.noarch.rpm
>
> Maybe a good idea is to start directly with TeX Live 2009 in Fedora
> because TL 2008 has different package set and TL 2009 contains newest
> packages and will likely be releas
I maintain beagle, and although I did add the Excludes directive to it, the
reason I haven't pushed the update is because it doesn't actually fix
anything other than prevent that annoying email from being sent out.
Besides, beagle worked fine for PPC64 users on Fedora 11 at some point.
--
Ing. J
Jindrich Novy píše v Čt 20. 08. 2009 v 14:44 +0200:
> Hi,
>
> TeX Live 2009 pretest is now available via external repository for
> testing in Fedora:
>
> rpm -Uhv
> http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/texlive-release-2009-0.1.fc11.noarch.rpm
>
> Maybe a good idea is to start directly with TeX
20.08.2009 18:01, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
Hello, All!
2009/8/20 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus):
I very want see this driver in Fedora:
http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/packages/dkms-tiacx/
This is free and even packaged, so no problem there...
This module has very sad story - since, it was made as
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 03:51:04PM +0400, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)
wrote:
> I very want see this driver in Fedora:
> http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/packages/dkms-tiacx/
> This is free and even packaged, so no problem there...
> May be except what it dkms? But it have not kernel modules (I kno
Hello, All!
2009/8/20 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) :
> I very want see this driver in Fedora:
> http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/packages/dkms-tiacx/
> This is free and even packaged, so no problem there...
This module has very sad story - since, it was made as a result of
direct reverse engineeri
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 15:40 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote:
> progressed smoothly, haven't tried runtime yet (though, seeing that your
So, just noticed I needed to install texlive-csplain in order to have
it, but it does not work:
This is pdfTeX, Version 3.1415926-1.40.10 (Web2C 2009)
restricted \wr
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 14:44 +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> TeX Live 2009 pretest is now available via external repository for
> testing in Fedora:
>
> rpm -Uhv
> http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/texlive-release-2009-0.1.fc11.noarch.rpm
>
> Maybe a good idea is to start directly with
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 14:44 +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> TeX Live 2009 pretest is now available via external repository for
> testing in Fedora:
>
> rpm -Uhv
> http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/texlive-release-2009-0.1.fc11.noarch.rpm
>
> Maybe a good idea is to start directly with
2009/8/19 Adam Miller :
> Hello all,
> I decided posting this to the devel-list would be most appropriate
> because I assume it to be the crowd who would put something like this
> to use (but I could be wrong). I threw together a little Firefox AddOn
> that adds the pkgdb as a search option and
Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote:
> I very want see this driver in Fedora:
> http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/packages/dkms-tiacx/
> This is free and even packaged, so no problem there...
> May be except what it dkms? But it have not kernel modules (I known what
> it is not permitted) and built a
Thank you for the answers.
20.08.2009 16:50, Josh Boyer wrote:
Fedora does not allow stand-alone kernel module packages. This would need
to be included in the kernel RPM itself. The best way to get that to happen
is to get the driver into the upstream kernel.
Yes, but not I developer of it. Ad
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 03:51:04PM +0400, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)
wrote:
> I very want see this driver in Fedora:
> http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/packages/dkms-tiacx/
> This is free and even packaged, so no problem there...
> May be except what it dkms? But it have not kernel modules (I kno
Dne Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:51:04 +0400 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)
napsal(a):
> I very want see this driver in Fedora:
> http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/packages/dkms-tiacx/
> This is free and even packaged, so no problem there...
> May be except what it dkms? But it have not kernel modules (I known
Hi,
TeX Live 2009 pretest is now available via external repository for
testing in Fedora:
rpm -Uhv
http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/texlive-release-2009-0.1.fc11.noarch.rpm
Maybe a good idea is to start directly with TeX Live 2009 in Fedora
because TL 2008 has different package set and TL
Rex Dieter wrote:
> Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
>> ==
>> The results in this summary consider Test Updates!
>> ==
>>
>> Summary of broken packages (by src.rpm nam
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> ==
> The results in this summary consider Test Updates!
> ==
>
> Summary of broken packages (by src.rpm name):
...
> kdeedu
As far
I very want see this driver in Fedora:
http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/packages/dkms-tiacx/
This is free and even packaged, so no problem there...
May be except what it dkms? But it have not kernel modules (I known what
it is not permitted) and built automatically on install phase.
But it depend on h
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 01:31:47PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 07:18:50 -0400, Josh wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:19:39AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> >On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>> >> ===
Compose started at Thu Aug 20 06:15:06 UTC 2009
New package anjal
An email client for small screen devices
New package liblastfm
Libraries to integrate Last.fm services
New package mutter-moblin
Moblin Netbook plugin for Mutter
New package nss-util
Network Security
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 07:18:50 -0400, Josh wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:19:39AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> >> ==
> >> The results in this summary consider Test
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:19:39AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>> ==
>> The results in this summary consider Test Updates!
>> =
Michel Salim writes:
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 19:57 -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
-pthread means -D_REENTRANT and -lpthread. -D_REENTRANT is basically
useless and you should use standard feature test macros or _GNU_SOURCE for
what you want. So just linking with -lpthread is what I would call the
2009/8/19 Ankit Patel :
>
> Is there any way to get notification, when packages (re)build is done?
>
> I am referring to task - "Ongoing Test Package Builds for Translation
> Review, Thu 2009-09-10 to Mon 2009-09-14" from the schedule, where FLP
> (Fedora Localization Project) team of translators m
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> ==
> The results in this summary consider Test Updates!
> ==
>
> Summary of broken packages (by src.rpm
==
The results in this summary consider Test Updates!
==
Summary of broken packages (by src.rpm name):
beagle
bmpx
clipsmm
f-spot
fedora-busi
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 18:15, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> cdamian:BADURL:wikicalendar-1.15.tar.gz:mediawiki-wikicalendar
>
Just checked this one and it works. Probably was a temporary problem
with googlecode .
Christof
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redha
81 matches
Mail list logo
