Dne 2.11.2009 08:47, Steven James Drinnan napsal(a):
David why you are so upset? No need to get nasty. I simply posted a
message about my problems installing F12. I did not Hijack any thread
(see the subject name).
You posted your message as a reply to the other thread. That's what
David
On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 15:47 +0800, Steven James Drinnan wrote:
David why you are so upset? No need to get nasty. I simply posted a
message about my problems installing F12. I did not Hijack any thread
(see the subject name). I thought this was a public forum. I sent this
to the whole mailing
On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 09:16 +0100, Michal Schmidt wrote:
OK, thanks for the link. I put a reply there. Bugzilla is a better
place
to discuss specific bugs than fedora-devel-list.
Thank you for testing the Beta release.
Michal
Ok and thanks a lot
signature.asc
Description: This is a
Hi,
this is just an announce that finally we will make a new rawhide
release tomorrow with udev support enabled in device-mapper and LVM2
packages (upcoming device-mapper-1.02.39-2, lvm2-2.02.54-2).
This is a scratch you can check and test if you would like to:
On 11/02/2009 02:43 PM, Peter Rajnoha wrote:
Hopefully I've mentioned eveything that's important. If you have any
questions, please, feel free to raise your comments here. The plan is
to switch this on tomorrow, but if there's anyone who sees a problem
here and who would like to test it
On 11/02/2009 10:12 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 11/02/2009 02:43 PM, Peter Rajnoha wrote:
Hopefully I've mentioned eveything that's important. If you have any
questions, please, feel free to raise your comments here. The plan is
to switch this on tomorrow, but if there's anyone who sees a
To Adam Williamson
Thank you for your command. Will RGB Gamma value be set 1.0 in the final
release? I think it needs.
And playing flashplayer in the web browser with Adobe Flash Player still has
some blocks. Maybe flash player cause that problem. I just wait.
To Tom 'spot' Callaway
Thank you
Le Lun 2 novembre 2009 11:29, Ankur Sinha a écrit :
hi,
I've filed a bug[1] against wodim not burning dvds correctly. While
browsing through another bug[2] on wodim, I came across this comment[3].
wodim is completely unmaintained since May 6th 2007, don't
expect to see any fixes anytime
On 11/02/2009 11:57 AM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Lun 2 novembre 2009 11:29, Ankur Sinha a écrit :
hi,
I've filed a bug[1] against wodim not burning dvds correctly. While
browsing through another bug[2] on wodim, I came across this comment[3].
wodim is completely unmaintained since May
On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 12:15 +0100, Roman Rakus wrote:
On 11/02/2009 11:57 AM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Lun 2 novembre 2009 11:29, Ankur Sinha a écrit :
hi,
I've filed a bug[1] against wodim not burning dvds correctly. While
browsing through another bug[2] on wodim, I came
Compose started at Mon Nov 2 06:15:07 UTC 2009
Broken deps for i386
--
1:nant-0.85-30.fc12.i686 requires mono(NDoc.Core) = 0:1.3.3498.0
Broken deps for x86_64
--
Hello,
I plan to disable the internal crash handler in wxGTK for the the
devel/F13 branch so we can use ABRT to report crashes. This will mean a
rebuild of wxGTK with --disable-catch_segvs. This change affects all
applications linked with wxGTK, because one symbol is removed from the
base
alekc...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi all.
I want to add to comps.xml for F10-F13 some optional packages which I not
own.
To kde-desktop group:
kde-plasma-quickaccess
kde-plasma-runcommand
kde-plasma-translatoid
kde-plasma-yawp
qt-recordmydesktop
skanlite
To graphical-internet group:
arora
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 15:59:07 +0530,
Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com wrote:
hi,
I've filed a bug[1] against wodim not burning dvds correctly. While
browsing through another bug[2] on wodim, I came across this comment[3].
wodim is completely unmaintained since May 6th 2007, don't
Dne 31.10.2009 12:51, Christoph Höger napsal(a):
Just one question: How are the lm_sensors names (10h, 11h) related to
current processors? 11h seems to be WIP.
AMD codename K10 refers to family 10h CPUs (Phenom, Phenom II). You
can see your cpu family in /proc/cpuinfo. It's decimal there, so
On Sat, 2009-10-31 at 09:25 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
2009/10/31 Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to:
I am working on packaging pagedgeometry and I noticed that when building
on gcc it passes -msse which I am guessing says to use sse instructions.
I think that even in F12 we can't assume
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 09:43:30 -0500,
Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
Strictly, this is not true. Newer binutils has a feature called
indirect functions that lets you do (logically, this is not what the
syntax actually looks like):
Can you point us to some documentation on this?
Is
On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 08:49 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 09:43:30 -0500, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
Strictly, this is not true. Newer binutils has a feature called
indirect functions that lets you do (logically, this is not what the
syntax actually
On 10/29/2009 11:17 AM, Steve Dickson wrote:
On 10/28/2009 03:05 PM, Roland McGrath wrote:
It sounds like you are saying that there is no way to export the same
host filesystems with the same client-perceived names under v4 as was
being done before under v[23]. Is that really true?
With
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Mamoru Tasaka
mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp wrote:
Jeffrey Ollie wrote, at 10/21/2009 01:53 AM +9:00:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Jeffrey Ollie j...@ocjtech.us wrote:
I'm trying to build the latest Asterisk sounds package, but I'm
getting the following
Ankur Sinha wrote:
wodim is completely unmaintained since May 6th 2007, don't
expect to see any fixes anytime soon as long as Redhat
continues to distribute wodim instead of the original software.
Can someone please clear this up?
It's just the usual FUD from Jörg Schilling. Ignore it.
The
Hello,
So this isn't a strictly development question, but based on the
answer it very well could be. I don't use evolution, but the
evolution-data-server is running. Is it used for anything else? If not,
perhaps it would be good to not run it as part of the gnome session when
the users
On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 14:00 +0100, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
And why the hell are you still using Luxi Mono, anyway? that thing went
out with the ark...
I'm not the person you are posing your question to, but I use Luxi Mono
and can give you an answer:
Because it is
On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 09:36 -0700, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
Hello,
So this isn't a strictly development question, but based on the
answer it very well could be. I don't use evolution, but the
evolution-data-server is running. Is it used for anything else? If not,
perhaps it would
On 11/02/2009 09:52 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 09:36 -0700, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
Hello,
So this isn't a strictly development question, but based on the
answer it very well could be. I don't use evolution, but the
evolution-data-server is running. Is it used for
Folks,
Boost 1.41 is going into Beta now. Can we please get boost caught-up to current
release for FC13?
Thanks,
Joel
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Dne 2.11.2009 17:31, Kevin Kofler napsal:
Ankur Sinha wrote:
wodim is completely unmaintained since May 6th 2007, don't
expect to see any fixes anytime soon as long as Redhat
continues to distribute wodim instead of the original software.
Can someone please clear this up?
It's just the usual
Hello, I have built a new release of cpl (an astronomical data
processing library) in koji. In rawhide, I get an (incorrect)
dependency on libcfitsio.so
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=1637146
where as in fc12 I get the correct dependency on libcfitsio.so.0:
On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 18:16 +0100, Michal Schmidt wrote:
Dne 2.11.2009 17:31, Kevin Kofler napsal:
Ankur Sinha wrote:
wodim is completely unmaintained since May 6th 2007, don't
expect to see any fixes anytime soon as long as Redhat
continues to distribute wodim instead of the original
On 11/02/2009 03:19 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
Jörg seems to be watching for bug reports related to wodim and comments
on them whenever someone new adds something.
Same applies to brasero and cdrdao.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 7:18 PM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 18:16 +0100, Michal Schmidt wrote:
Dne 2.11.2009 17:31, Kevin Kofler napsal:
Ankur Sinha wrote:
wodim is completely unmaintained since May 6th 2007, don't
expect to see any fixes anytime soon as long
On 10/26/2009 10:34 AM, Steve Dickson wrote:
[With the next nfs-utils rawhide build, I will be flipping the ]
[switch that will cause all NFS client mounts to try NFS v4 first ]
[At the bottom of this email has the workarounds if this change does ]
[indeed cause pain ]
As part of the
Steve Dickson ste...@redhat.com writes:
[...]
With Build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1783028
the mount command will first try to do a v4 mount and then fall back
to v3/v2 mounts if v4 is not support. This fall back will also happen
if the server returns ENOENT, which
On 11/2/09 1:07 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 12:18 +, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 22:25 -0400, Tony Nelson wrote:
On 09-10-28 18:24:49, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 06:17:31PM -0400, Tony Nelson wrote:
...
Does Fedora PPC work or install on
On 11/02/2009 07:18 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
That may be true, but since cdrecord is not shippable, it's a pretty
vacuous truth.
Out of curiosity, was that just because of the GPL2-CDDL mix ? Or was
there another reason ? Last I checked, only mkisofs is affected by that
and the rest of
David Woodhouse dw...@infradead.org writes:
My crystal ball isn't working today, so I _couldn't_ help you, even if I
_didn't_ have a policy of not helping thread-hijackers until they post
their problem politely ;)
Oh, I guess it's time to consider installing a RAICB, a Redundant Array
of
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 21:47:47 +0100,
Denis Leroy de...@poolshark.org wrote:
On 11/02/2009 07:18 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
That may be true, but since cdrecord is not shippable, it's a pretty
vacuous truth.
Out of curiosity, was that just because of the GPL2-CDDL mix ? Or
was there
This is unfortunately not actually a helpful topic, but I am deathly curious.
Will GNOME be stuck at 2.26 for the rest of the F11 cycle? Or are
updates in the works, just not ready yet?
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Jud Craft craft...@gmail.com wrote:
This is unfortunately not actually a helpful topic, but I am deathly curious.
Will GNOME be stuck at 2.26 for the rest of the F11 cycle? Or are
updates in the works, just not ready yet?
Normally, the GNOME team normally
On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 16:44 -0500, Jud Craft wrote:
This is unfortunately not actually a helpful topic, but I am deathly curious.
Will GNOME be stuck at 2.26 for the rest of the F11 cycle? Or are
updates in the works, just not ready yet?
We've updated GNOME in F11 to 2.26.3.
We don't do
Word of warning.. I am no too familiar with C across platforms. I am
trying to package ruby-ffi (spec file is at [1]) and when I do a scratch
build in Koji [2] it runs fine on x86 but is failing in ppc_64. It
appears that __WORDSIZE is not being set [3]. I looked at the CFLags for
the x86_64
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 05:15:50PM -0500, Bryan Kearney wrote:
Word of warning.. I am no too familiar with C across platforms. I am
trying to package ruby-ffi (spec file is at [1]) and when I do a scratch
build in Koji [2] it runs fine on x86 but is failing in ppc_64. It
appears that
On 11/02/2009 05:23 AM, Liang Suilong wrote:
Thank you for hard work. Crhomium browser in Fedora 12 looks perfect. Is
there any plan to push chromium into rawhide or updates-testing. I think
chromium has enough stability to make more users test itself.
Not until Chromium comes out of beta and
On 11/02/2009 03:47 PM, Denis Leroy wrote:
On 11/02/2009 07:18 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
That may be true, but since cdrecord is not shippable, it's a pretty
vacuous truth.
Out of curiosity, was that just because of the GPL2-CDDL mix ? Or was
there another reason ? Last I checked, only
I've filed a bug[1] against wodim not burning dvds correctly. While
browsing through another bug[2] on wodim, I came across this comment[3].
wodim is completely unmaintained since May 6th 2007, don't
expect to see any fixes anytime soon as long as Redhat
continues to distribute wodim instead of
On 11/02/2009 04:26 PM, Rajeesh K Nambiar wrote:
I did even contact Mr. Chuck Bigelow to find out any
possibility of licensing Luxi fonts under an open source license, when
Fedora decided to drop them.
For what it is worth, when we dropped them, I contacted the upstream
copyright holder as
On the other hand trying to build Jörg's stuff isn't easy on Fedora. And
might not even work as he likes to use a interface that was depreciated
a while back for talking to the cd/dvd drives.
I would guess that you are not informed correctly.
My software easily compiles on more than 30 different
That may be true, but since cdrecord is not shippable, it's a pretty
vacuous truth. The solution is obviously to fix the bug and help revive
upstream, or else host a development tree on fh if upstream stays idle.
Note that is is just the other way:
It is cdrkit that is undistributable as it is
On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 14:23 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote:
I'm not sure about this... Actually I like the fact we can define a
pseudo root other than '/'... which means you really want a live exported
directory with the fsid=0 option... If I am understanding what you are
saying...
No, that's
Hey Joerg,
On Tue, 2009-11-03 at 00:21 +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
I've filed a bug[1] against wodim not burning dvds correctly. While
browsing through another bug[2] on wodim, I came across this comment[3].
wodim is completely unmaintained since May 6th 2007, don't
expect to see any
Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com wrote:
I guess it wasn't good enough for you to get booted out of the GNOME
Bugzilla?
Well, there are always some bad guys who don't like to see people who help
users.
The person from the GNOME project just verified that he attacks people who are
helpful. He
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 07:26:31PM -0500, Bryan Kearney wrote:
/usr/include/gnu/stubs.h:7:27: error: gnu/stubs-32.h: No such file or
directory
That means you don't have glibc-devel installed for the arch you need, on
ppc you likely have installed glibc-devel.ppc64 but need also
Joerg Schilling wrote:
why Redhat started to distribute the proken fork instead of the original
software.
The only thing that's proken (sic) is your spelling.
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
Joerg Schilling wrote:
It is cdrkit that is undistributable as it is cdrkit that in conflict with
the Copyright law and the GPL.
Maybe under your reality distortion field. In the rest of the world, that's
just not true.
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
W dniu 03.11.2009 00:19, Tom spot Callaway pisze:
On 11/02/2009 03:47 PM, Denis Leroy wrote:
On 11/02/2009 07:18 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
That may be true, but since cdrecord is not shippable, it's a pretty
vacuous truth.
Out of curiosity, was that just because of the GPL2-CDDL mix ? Or was
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 5:48 PM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
That may be true, but since cdrecord is not shippable, it's a pretty
vacuous truth. The solution is obviously to fix the bug and help revive
upstream, or else host a development tree on fh if upstream
On Tue, 2009-11-03 at 01:21 +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com wrote:
I guess it wasn't good enough for you to get booted out of the GNOME
Bugzilla?
Well, there are always some bad guys who don't like to see people who help
users.
The person from the
Oops, I forgot to send this on Friday - sorry!
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCo meeting 20091030
===
Meeting started by jds2001 at 17:00:16 UTC. The full logs are available
at
On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 23:08 -0500, Jon Stanley wrote:
* legally objectionable, binary and non-free items (jds2001,
17:33:34)
* AGREED: spot's proposal is accpeted. (jds2001, 17:47:00)
Not the _best_ example of good meeting summary practice I've ever seen
=)
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA
Some Linux distros has migrated from grub-0.97 to grub2-1.97. Grub2 provides
more useful features to users. And it is more easy to add a new file system
support. But I can not see Fedora has any plan for GRUB2. I read a feature
page on Fedora wiki. There is no progress on grub2.
Now Fedora
Top three FAS account holders who have completed reviewing Package
review components on bugzilla for last 7 days ending 1st Nov were
Mamoru Tasaka, Thomas Spura and Peter Lemenkov.
Mamoru Tasaka : 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509936
@Judd, wait for the F12 release, it's the best 'update' and it is not ready
yet!
I hope so. I'm not sure anything can top Fedora 8. Hard to explain
how much I enjoyed that distribution.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
2009/11/3 Jud Craft craft...@gmail.com
I hope so. I'm not sure anything can top Fedora 8. Hard to explain
how much I enjoyed that distribution.
mmh, the Gnome Desktop Live CD of F12 is really more gnomish since the CDs
before.
No qt, no openoffice, abiword
gnumeric is still missing and
On 09-11-02 13:07:09, Dan Williams wrote:
oldworld topped out at 366MHz anyway right? (the 333 and 366 Beige
G3 were only sold from 1998-08-12 - 1999-01-01 too) That's pretty
much the minimum you'd need to run Fedora anyway these days... Not
sure it's really worth it, you'll need at
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Math-Pari/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv26189
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Math-Pari.spec sources
Log Message:
Update to 2.010804
Index: .cvsignore
Author: kasal
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-MIME-Lite/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv3209
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-MIME-Lite.spec sources
Log Message:
- new upstream version
Index: .cvsignore
Author: kasal
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-Text-CSV_XS/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv4309
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Text-CSV_XS.spec sources
Log Message:
- new upstream version
Index: .cvsignore
Author: kasal
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-MIME-Lite/F-12
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv4664
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-MIME-Lite.spec sources
Log Message:
sync with rawhide
Index: .cvsignore
Author: kasal
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-Text-CSV_XS/F-12
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv9228
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Text-CSV_XS.spec sources
Log Message:
sync with rawhide
Index: .cvsignore
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532278
Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Author: ryanlerch
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Makefile-DOM/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv8984/devel
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
import.log perl-Makefile-DOM.spec
Log Message:
initial RPM
--- NEW FILE import.log ---
Author: ryanlerch
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Makefile-DOM/F-10
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv16716/F-10
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
import.log perl-Makefile-DOM.spec
Log Message:
Initial RPM
--- NEW FILE import.log ---
Author: ryanlerch
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Makefile-DOM/F-11
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv4951/F-11
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
import.log perl-Makefile-DOM.spec
Log Message:
Initial RPM
--- NEW FILE import.log ---
Author: sradvan
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Makefile-Parser/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv14604/devel
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
import.log perl-Makefile-Parser.spec
Log Message:
Initial RPM
--- NEW FILE import.log ---
Author: ryanlerch
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Makefile-DOM/F-12
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15832/F-12
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
import.log perl-Makefile-DOM.spec
Log Message:
Initial RPM
--- NEW FILE import.log ---
Author: nb
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Makefile-Parser/F-10
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv27442
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
perl-Makefile-Parser.spec
Log Message:
Build perl-Makefile-Parser
--- NEW FILE perl-Makefile-Parser.spec
Author: nb
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Makefile-Parser/F-11
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv28497
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
perl-Makefile-Parser.spec
Log Message:
Build perl-Makefile-Parser
--- NEW FILE perl-Makefile-Parser.spec
Author: nb
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Makefile-Parser/F-12
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv28945
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
perl-Makefile-Parser.spec
Log Message:
Build perl-Makefile-Parser
--- NEW FILE perl-Makefile-Parser.spec
Author: sciurius
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-V/F-10
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv3308/F-10
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
import.log perl-V.spec
Log Message:
Initial check-in source from upstream.
--- NEW FILE import.log ---
Author: sciurius
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-V/F-11
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv3867/F-11
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
import.log perl-V.spec
Log Message:
Initial import from upstream sources.
--- NEW FILE import.log ---
Author: sciurius
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-V/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv11806/devel
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
import.log perl-V.spec
Log Message:
Initial import from upstream sources.
--- NEW FILE import.log ---
Author: sciurius
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-V/F-12
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv11426/F-12
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
import.log perl-V.spec
Log Message:
Initial import from upstream sources.
--- NEW FILE import.log ---
Author: spot
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Class-Trigger/F-10
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv8870
Modified Files:
perl-Class-Trigger.spec sources
Log Message:
update to 0.13
Index: perl-Class-Trigger.spec
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531969
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2009-11-02 17:43:36 EDT ---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532278
Bug 532278 depends on bug 497283, which changed state.
Bug 497283 Summary: Review Request: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Engine-Kate -
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532278
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2009-11-03 02:46:44 EDT ---
86 matches
Mail list logo
