On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 2:48 AM, Josephine Tannhäuser wrote:
2009/12/21, Josephine Tannhäuser :
2009/12/19, Simon Wesp :
griv: A GTK-Chat based on the RIV-Chat-protocol
Bugs: 0
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/bugs/griv
python-rabbyt: Sprite library for Python
Bugs: 0
2009/12/21, Orcan Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com:
I tried to push the Take ownership button on python-rabbyt's devel
branch and it worked. Then I pushed Release Ownership. That worked
too. Do you get an error message when you use those buttons? Are you
logged in? Sometimes there is a Verify
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 7:39 AM, Paul p...@all-the-johnsons.co.uk wrote:
Hi,
Sometime today or tomorrow I'll be uploading Mono-2.6 and the final
release of MD-2.2 with all the fun that it will bring. There are lots of
changes under the hood of mono and while the likes of gtk-sharp2 et al
are
Is there expected to be a mass rebuild for F13 - for example, to include
GCC 4.5 (which will probably be released the first half of 2010, judging
by past release dates)?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
Top three FAS account holders who have completed reviewing Package
review components on bugzilla for last 21 days ending 20th Dec were
Parag AN(पराग), Mamoru Tasaka and David Nalley.
Parag AN(पराग) : 17
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536737
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 05:19:20AM -0500, Andre Robatino wrote:
Is there expected to be a mass rebuild for F13 - for example, to include
GCC 4.5 (which will probably be released the first half of 2010, judging
by past release dates)?
I do not intend to jump to GCC 4.5 for F13, that would mean
Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 05:19:20AM -0500, Andre Robatino wrote:
Is there expected to be a mass rebuild for F13 - for example, to include
GCC 4.5 (which will probably be released the first half of 2010, judging
by past release dates)?
I do not intend to jump to GCC 4.5
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 06:17:26AM -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 05:19:20AM -0500, Andre Robatino wrote:
Is there expected to be a mass rebuild for F13 - for example, to include
GCC 4.5 (which will probably be released the first half of 2010, judging
by past release
2009/12/21 Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com:
On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 05:06 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
So what do you suggest doing in such a case? Temporarily reverting the F-n
branch to the old release, build, then bump it up again? This sounds really
suboptimal to me (in addition to being a
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 6:37 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 06:17:26AM -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
How could I learn what 4.5 features are backported?
From gcc %changelog?
To list some of them:
- VTA
- -gdwarf-3, -gstrict-dwarf support, defaults to -gdwarf-3
- various
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 07:03:13AM -0500, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
It would be nice if you folks add these little explanations as
comments next to the patches of the gcc SPEC file. (this is also a
packaging requirement [1]).
1) gcc-4.4-RH has its own svn branch in upstream repository, so the
Compose started at Mon Dec 21 08:15:07 UTC 2009
Broken deps for i386
--
1:abiword-2.8.1-2.fc13.i686 requires libwv-1.2.so.3
anjal-0.1.0-1.fc13.i686 requires libevolution-mail-shared.so.0
anjal-0.1.0-1.fc13.i686
On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 07:38 -0500, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 7:21 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 07:03:13AM -0500, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
It would be nice if you folks add these little explanations as
comments next to the patches of the gcc SPEC file.
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 5:50 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
I do not intend to jump to GCC 4.5 for F13, that would mean I and others
would have to spend almost all our time on that already by now, while there
is still a lot of work on GCC 4.4 bugfixing.
GCC 4.4-RH contains several
Josephine Tannhäuser wrote:
2009/12/21, Orcan Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com:
I tried to push the Take ownership button on python-rabbyt's devel
branch and it worked. Then I pushed Release Ownership. That worked
too. Do you get an error message when you use those buttons? Are you
logged in?
On Dec 21, 2009, at 4:38, Orcan Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 7:21 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 07:03:13AM -0500, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
It would be nice if you folks add these little explanations as
comments next to the patches of the gcc
Hi,
Trying to take biniax and bastet, same problems.
Tried taking up peppy (successful on the devel branch) but the same
problem occurred on the other branches and for xpad as well.
Thanks and Regards,
Vivek
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 01:53:42 -0500, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
/((Mon|Tues?|Wed|Thu(rs?)?|Fri|Sat|Sun)\s+(Jan|Feb|Mar|Apr|May|June?|July?|Aug|Sep|Oct|Nov|Dec)\s+[0-3]?[0-9]\s+(19|20)[0-9][0-9]\s+[A-Za-z0-9\s]+[...@]+@[^\s@]+\s+2.[4-6].[0-9.-]+\s*)/
I don't think this will catch a
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 9:36 PM, Vivek Shah boni.vi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Trying to take biniax and bastet, same problems.
Tried taking up peppy (successful on the devel branch) but the same
problem occurred on the other branches and for xpad as well.
Oops did not see Christoph's
Hi,
I recently submitting Deja-dup, a backup program written in Vala for
review at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540761
Vala is described in more detail at http://live.gnome.org/Vala. Deja-dup
like many Vala programs include both the Vala source code and the C
source code to avoid
Jesse Keating jkeat...@j2solutions.net writes:
On Dec 21, 2009, at 4:38, Orcan Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com wrote:
Seriously, this comment about the patch in the specfile is a
packaging requirement, not a personal request.
With git style patches (and others) where there is lots of context
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
You need to first prelink -u on a copy of the program, then
run it and let it dump itself, then package it up.
Ah, thanks.
FWIW, this didn't work.
Hi,
I recently submitting Deja-dup, a backup program written in Vala for
review at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540761
Vala is described in more detail at http://live.gnome.org/Vala. Deja-dup
like many Vala programs include both the Vala source code and the C
source code to
digiKam 1.0.0 was released today. I think a lot of us are running
1.0-beta 6 installed via yum. Would it be possible to get 1.0.0 into
F12 stable prior to Christmas ?
I know I can build it from source, but I need to install it on several
machines and it would be much easier to do it via a yum
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I recently submitting Deja-dup, a backup program written in Vala for
review at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540761
Vala is described in more detail at http://live.gnome.org/Vala. Deja-dup
like
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 11:57:16 -0500, Garry Williams gtwilli...@gmail.com
wrote:
The grammar described in RFC 822 is surprisingly complex.
http://www.ex-parrot.com/pdw/Mail-RFC822-Address.html
yeah, no kidding, and so is a proper regex to match it. I figured
anything not a space or '@'
On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 11:07 -0500, James Cassell wrote:
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 01:53:42 -0500, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
I'm having some difficulty applying this. It's going into a perl file
thusly:
$logmsg =~ s|/((Mon|Tues?|Wed|Thu(rs?)?|Fri|Sat|Sun)\s+(Jan|Feb|Mar|Apr|
Linuxguy123 wrote:
digiKam 1.0.0 was released today. I think a lot of us are running
1.0-beta 6 installed via yum. Would it be possible to get 1.0.0 into
F12 stable prior to Christmas ?
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/digikam-1.0.0-1.fc12
stable that quickly? I'd feel a bit
On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 11:40 -0600, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
I'm having some difficulty applying this. It's going into a perl file
thusly:
$logmsg =~ s|/((Mon|Tues?|Wed|Thu(rs?)?|Fri|Sat|Sun)\s+(Jan|Feb|Mar|Apr|
Once upon a time, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com said:
$logmsg =~ s|/((Mon|Tues?|Wed|Thu(rs?)?|Fri|Sat|Sun)\s+(Jan|Feb|Mar|Apr|
May|June?|July?|Aug|Sep|Oct|Nov|Dec)\s+[0-3]?[0-9]\s+(19|20)[0-9][0-9]\s
+[^]+[...@]+@[^\s@]+\s+2.[4-6].[0-9.-]+\s*)/|mg
The first character after the =~ s is the
Jesse Keating wrote:
Treat the origin/F-?? as the master for that release, do your long
running not immediately ready for build work on topic branches thereof
and only merge them when you're ready to build.
This requires us to know in advance that the work will be long running. In
my
2009/12/21 Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org:
Hi,
I recently submitting Deja-dup, a backup program written in Vala for
review at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540761
Vala is described in more detail at http://live.gnome.org/Vala. Deja-dup
like many Vala programs include
Hello,
does anybody know how to contact Chris Weyl?
He is the current maintainer of libssh2 Fedora package, which still breaks
(lib)curl in Fedora. However the fix is already available and the same issue
has been successfully resolved in RHEL-6:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/523796
FWIW, this didn't work. It solved the problem with generating
uninstallable RPMs, but the binary RPM contains a pristine SBCL image.
I know a good image was dumped, because it is executed during the
build to generate some auxiliary files. I see it running in the log,
so something about the
On 12/18/2009 10:50 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 10:17 PM, John Poelstrapoels...@redhat.com wrote:
One of the complaints heard during the last release cycle was that some
maintainers where unclear what all the schedule milestones meant.
Before we reach any of these
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Dec 21, 2009, at 4:38, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
Yeah, those comments in the patches are quite informative, like libtool
sucks.
Seriously, this comment about the patch in the specfile is a
packaging requirement, not a personal request.
On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 14:41 -0500, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Dec 21, 2009, at 4:38, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
Yeah, those comments in the patches are quite informative, like libtool
sucks.
Seriously, this comment about the patch in the
On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 19:56 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Jesse Keating wrote:
Treat the origin/F-?? as the master for that release, do your long
running not immediately ready for build work on topic branches thereof
and only merge them when you're ready to build.
This requires us to know
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 10:32:18 -0800,
John Poelstra poels...@redhat.com wrote:
Great idea. I need someone from the Spins SIG to tell me what those
dates are. It would also be really helpful to have a link to a wiki
page explaining the process I can give out when questions arise.
I
Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
Seriously, this comment about the patch in the specfile is a
packaging requirement, not a personal request.
It's not a requirement, it's only a SHOULD. If there are good reasons not to
do it, it's OK not to do it.
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
On 12/21/2009 12:30 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 10:32:18 -0800,
John Poelstrapoels...@redhat.com wrote:
Great idea. I need someone from the Spins SIG to tell me what those
dates are. It would also be really helpful to have a link to a wiki
page explaining the
Hi there,
Not that anything is set in stone yet, but I wanted to give you a
heads-up on packaging changes in Ruby that we (the Ruby SIG) are trying
to figure out.
The ultimate goal is to make Fedora the best development platform out
there no matter what it is exactly you target.
Core features
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 09:36:59PM +0530, Vivek Shah wrote:
Hi,
Trying to take biniax and bastet, same problems.
Tried taking up peppy (successful on the devel branch) but the same
problem occurred on the other branches and for xpad as well.
If people could try again I'd appreciate it -- we
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 05:00:58PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
Hi,
I recently submitting Deja-dup, a backup program written in Vala for
review at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540761
Vala is described in more detail at http://live.gnome.org/Vala. Deja-dup
like many
I will be out of the office starting 12/22/2009 and will not return until 01/04/2010.I will check emails in the evening and respond to your message. Please contact Teresia Lai if you need immediate assistance.This message contains information from Equifax Inc. which may be confidential and
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 11:37 PM, John Poelstra poels...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/21/2009 12:30 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 10:32:18 -0800,
John Poelstrapoels...@redhat.com wrote:
Great idea. I need someone from the Spins SIG to tell me what those
dates are. It
On Sun, 2009-12-20 at 19:31 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Sun, 2009-12-20 at 10:28 +0100, Hans Ulrich Niedermann wrote:
Currently, it appears that I can push arbitrarily named branches, at
least if the package does not have per branch ACLs:
Yes, that makes sense given the way the ACL
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 01:04:32 +,
Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
The ambiguity of the spins process threw me somewhat in F-12 with
Moblin being very new to all the process (well having seen it and
never participated) as I couldn't find anything that really outlined
it
On 12/21/2009 06:10 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
This has been done. The way the ACLs now work, if you are a packager,
you can create branches in any package that start with private-. This
makes it even easier to pass changes around as you can tell the
maintainer to pull from or merge from a
Hey everyone;
I need some advice on how to use the Fedora logo. According to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Logo/UsageGuidelines it's okay to use change
the typeface of the Fedora text to white if the color backing it is Fedora
blue (under Never Use the Logo on Similarly-Colored Backgrounds);
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 09:51:10PM -0700, Ryan Rix wrote:
Hey everyone;
I need some advice on how to use the Fedora logo. According to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Logo/UsageGuidelines it's okay to use change
the typeface of the Fedora text to white if the color backing it is Fedora
On Mon 21 December 2009 11:40:54 pm Ian Weller wrote:
The code currently loads the png from
/usr/share/pixmaps/fedora-logo-small.png and generates the Welcome to
text from MgOpen Modata Bold in the same Panotone 2935 of the logo
typeface. If the logo typeface was made white, it would
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
It didn't help that the names changed for F12.
Yeah, I think that name change was a mistake, but sadly my proposal to
revert it was voted down in FESCo.
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
On 12/22/2009 08:40 AM, Ian Weller wrote:
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 09:51:10PM -0700, Ryan Rix wrote:
I need some advice on how to use the Fedora logo. According to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Logo/UsageGuidelines it's okay to use change
the typeface of the Fedora text to white if the color
Jesse Keating wrote:
Nobody should be able to create any branches that do not start with
private-.
I really don't see the point of this, why can't we just allow any branch
name that isn't a reserved name (master or F-[0-9]+)?
We'll make sure that the buildsystem will not allow any official
56 matches
Mail list logo
