On 10-01-06 17:54:10, Robert Relyea wrote:
On 01/06/2010 01:43 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
[or...@orca fedora/devel]$ ls */dead.package | wc -l
666
We're ok. The original number may have been 616:
http://www.csad.ox.ac.uk/POxy/beast616.htm
No, that's merely the most common correction by
On 09-12-19 17:19:37, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
...
There is a -O2 flag issue that causes some builds to hang. Maybe
those emacs hangs are related to this bug in gcc
It happened to 2 of my packages. Removing -O2 makes things compile in
my packages. (No I didn't do official builds without -O2
On 09-12-16 18:19:17, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 08:38 -0400, William W. Austin wrote:
05/01/2007 05:38:26 AM (Tue, 01 May 2007 08:38:26 -0400)
Your date is still wrong.
No, the date is correct. That's when the message was sent the first
time around -- it's in the list
On 09-11-20 07:06:34, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
On 11/20/2009 12:24 PM, Matthew Booth wrote:
...
5. Can abrt give me a list of submitted BZs so I can browse them if
I want to?
This is in our TODO: ABRT should find possible duplicates and offer
the reporter to browse them and manually mark
On 09-11-19 05:06:16, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 01:48 -0500, Tony Nelson wrote:
On 09-11-18 20:09:18, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 13:50 -0500, Tony Nelson wrote:
..
Fedora has always been this way. Have you tried to use sound
or video
On 09-11-18 13:44:43, nodata wrote:
Am 2009-11-18 19:16, schrieb Bruno Wolff III:
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 17:45:26 +,
Bastien Nocerabnoc...@redhat.com wrote:
Once we get the new user management stuff into F13 [1], we'd
probably tighten that rule so that only admins are given the
On 09-11-18 20:09:18, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 13:50 -0500, Tony Nelson wrote:
..
Fedora has always been this way. Have you tried to use sound or
video in the past few releases? I think it's called creative
destruction.
And I'm sure the passive-aggressive in you
On 09-11-13 16:13:20, Ikem Krueger wrote:
Please click on the link below and enter your birthday for me. I
am creating a birthday calendar for myself. Don't worry, it'll take
less than a minute (and you don't have to enter your year of birth).
Spam? o.O
Phishing.
--
On 09-11-02 13:07:09, Dan Williams wrote:
oldworld topped out at 366MHz anyway right? (the 333 and 366 Beige
G3 were only sold from 1998-08-12 - 1999-01-01 too) That's pretty
much the minimum you'd need to run Fedora anyway these days... Not
sure it's really worth it, you'll need at
On 09-10-29 08:18:30, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 22:25 -0400, Tony Nelson wrote:
On 09-10-28 18:24:49, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 06:17:31PM -0400, Tony Nelson wrote:
Sorry to bug developers, but I didn't get any bites from PPC
users on fedora-list
On 09-10-29 16:41:57, King InuYasha wrote:
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 7:18 AM, David Woodhouse
dw...@infradead.orgwrote:
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 22:25 -0400, Tony Nelson wrote:
On 09-10-28 18:24:49, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 06:17:31PM -0400, Tony Nelson wrote:
Sorry
Sorry to bug developers, but I didn't get any bites from PPC users on
fedora-list.
Does Fedora PPC work or install on oldworld PCI Macs, such as a beige
G3 desktop? My impression is that no one has tried it on an oldworld
Mac in the last few releases, and that getting it to boot at all would
On 09-10-20 17:49:28, nodata wrote:
Hi,
What's with the extra rpmnew files on an upgrade?
Some examples:
# md5sum /etc/pki/tls/openssl.cnf.rpmnew /etc/pki/tls/openssl.cnf
7c8f8d809c5b618e1604207525161101 /etc/pki/tls/openssl.cnf.rpmnew
7c8f8d809c5b618e1604207525161101
On 09-09-29 15:37:10, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
I would argue no. The guidelines are written to apply to all
libraries except with very limited exceptions to keep this from
happening because security vulnerabilities are not limited to network
facing code, suid code, or any other class that
On 09-09-26 08:32:45, Kevin Kofler wrote:
...
Of course the root of the problem is ATLAS's lack of support for
runtime CPU feature detection ...
Presumably that could be added to the Fedora package as a patch. It's
SMOP to check the CPU and load the proper library, if someone who knew
how
On 09-09-15 12:06:54, Adam Jackson wrote:
...
def mode_dpi_cmp(x, y):
return cmp(abs(x.dpi - 96), abs(y.dpi - 96))
...
The names x and y suggest coordinates to me. I'd have read the code
right the first time if the names had been a and b.
def best_mode(modes, dpi_known = True):
already uses an Athlon-core processor on Rawhide did it.
On 09-08-13 10:34:58, Peter Robinson wrote:
Tony Nelson wrote:
...
Is there a simple way for ordinary users to know if their CPU is
expected to work on F12 (as an i686 according to GCC)? Is there
a tool to run that doesn't require
and similar processors.
2009/8/14 Tony Nelson
That doesn't actually quite say about SSE2, but at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Talk:Features/F12X86Support:
_Bill Nottingham_ Once a set has been decided on, this should be
pretty trivial. With respect to the proposal, 'grep sse2
I've noticed that F12 will require a CPU with i686 architecture, and
that my Athlon 1.2GHz won't qualify. I accept that F11 is the last
Fedora release that I'll be able to use. My concern is that many
present Fedora users will be unpleasantly surprised that a new
installation doesn't work,
19 matches
Mail list logo
