On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 11:54:14AM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jan 2010, Panu Matilainen wrote:
For the impatient:
Starting with today's rawhide, the these kind of constructs in
specs no longer work:
%{?!foo: %define foo bar}
For the generally desired effect, the above
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 08:58:08AM -0600, Adam Miller wrote:
I'm currently packaging lessfs and there are apparently a couple
libraries that are a part of it that have become a cause for concern
by the reviewer (rightfully so) and I'm hoping someone could offer a
recommendation of how to go
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 02:24:17PM -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
They do happen to have the same WM_CLASS and WM_CLIENT_LEADER window
properties. But that still only addresses automatic focus changes
within a single application. Automatic focus changes across apps is
probably desirable;
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 02:16:13PM +, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 15:53 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 05:00:58PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
Hi,
I recently submitting Deja-dup, a backup program written in Vala for
review
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 03:52:14PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
Hi,
I recently submitting Deja-dup, a backup program written in Vala for
review at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540761
Vala is described in more detail at
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 09:36:59PM +0530, Vivek Shah wrote:
Hi,
Trying to take biniax and bastet, same problems.
Tried taking up peppy (successful on the devel branch) but the same
problem occurred on the other branches and for xpad as well.
If people could try again I'd appreciate it -- we
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 05:00:58PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
Hi,
I recently submitting Deja-dup, a backup program written in Vala for
review at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540761
Vala is described in more detail at http://live.gnome.org/Vala. Deja-dup
like many
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 10:39:18PM +0100, Julian Aloofi wrote:
Am Freitag, den 18.12.2009, 18:12 +0100 schrieb Nicoleau Fabien:
Hi,
I'm packaging phatch that provides /usr/bin/phatch, a graphical
application to manage some operations on photos. It handles command
line parameters so
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 01:35:44PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 18:41:22 -0500, Tom wrote:
Orcan Ogetbil writes:
If there is a way to file an update (same version and release except
the disttag) to multiple branches, please let me know.
Usually it works: just
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 12:33:20AM -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 12:35 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
master makes a lot of sense from a git perspective. devel (or rawhide)
makes sense from what we actually call the code that that branch eventually
makes. A symlink
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 10:42:28AM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 07:28 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 12:33:20AM -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 12:35 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
master makes a lot of sense from a git
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 10:13:33AM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com writes:
On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 13:33 -0500, Todd Zullinger wrote:
My thinking is that we don't use origin/next or origin/maint either
and both are common upstream in git and the kernel.
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 12:15:37PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
I tried to submit an update for both the fc12 and fc11 versions of
postgresql. It did not work; I had to file them as separate updates.
I'm pretty sure it used to work --- is my memory failing me, or is
this new breakage? If the
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:22:35AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 13:16 -0500, Todd Zullinger wrote:
I'd like to suggest (again ;) that origin/devel be used. Either that,
or use master as the local dir, e.g. kernel/master. Having it differ
seems like a recipe for
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 01:27:52PM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Lun 14 décembre 2009 12:45, Josephine Tannhäuser a écrit :
of course this is a practicable rule, BUT
the problem is upstream or the rule itself.
kernels internal zlib is not a lib its a module,
wordpress internal
On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 11:48:12AM +0100, Adrian Reber wrote:
I was informed that wordpress uses bundled libraries and would like to
request an exception from FESCo.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544720
You need to have an explanation of why an exception would be
On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 09:05:00AM -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 05:39 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
This is a heads up that I'm going to orphan gnome-common. I don't do any
gtk programming anymore so it doesn't make sense for me to keep this
package. mclasen has
This is a heads up that I'm going to orphan gnome-common. I don't do any
gtk programming anymore so it doesn't make sense for me to keep this
package. mclasen has done several of the recently needed updates to this
package; if he and the desktop team would like to take it over let me know;
I'll
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 01:25:08PM +0100, Pierre-Yves wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 13:12 +0100, Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) wrote:
sugar-base-0.86.0-1.fc12.x86_64 : Base Sugar library
I'm co-maintaining it, so I'll try to have a look at this one.
I'm just pointing out this :
Note that
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 06:10:59PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 19:38 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
How that translates in packages and defaults is not really the most
important part, but the plan is to have strict package defaults + a
policy package that makes
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 04:23:23PM -0500, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
Hello.
Nowadays the jack project has two branches - old jack (1) branch with
version 0.116.2 and new one called jack2 version 1.9.3.
I'd like to gather opinions and
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 05:34:40PM +0100, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
Hi,
Alexander pointed out that I was suggesting a wrong name for Saxon 9
package [1]. In fact there's a couple of packages in repositories now
that violate the naming policy [2] in the very same way. Apart from
wondering what
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 09:00:22PM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le lundi 23 novembre 2009 à 13:48 -0600, Chris Adams a écrit :
Once upon a time, Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net said:
Le lundi 23 novembre 2009 à 09:51 -0700, Jerry James a écrit :
1) I'm going to nag you
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 05:55:15PM -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 14:08 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
It's not QA's role to define exactly what the security policy should
look like or what it should cover, but from the point of view of
testing, what we really need are
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 11:52:42PM -0500, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
It's a hack. It's Fedora-specific, so doesn't belong in RPM (or
anything else). And RPM will no longer produce predictable versioning.
My proposed hack's outcome is quite predictable.
I just faced this same attitude in
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 08:50:06PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 00:50 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
And why can't all this be done with s/git/SVN/? All we really need apart
from what CVS already provides is atomic commit IDs, to make the
maintainers would not tag
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 06:46:59AM -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
I'd like to add my favorite repo. Possible?
I thought preupgrade already took whatever repos you have enabled in yum.
Do you want it to have UI for selecting repositories? Or something else?
-Toshio
pgpxlKePkYGCm.pgp
Description:
This is a heads up for people using the PackageDB in scripts. The plan is
to have the 0.5.x PackageDB deployed in infrastructure no later than Fedora
13 Alpha (currently penciled in as 2010-02-09). This release will include
major changes in the URL structure and a few removals of unused methods.
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 07:03:53PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org writes:
On 11/19/2009 05:00 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
So I just spent a frustrating little while looking for the
focus-follows-mouse setting on a fairly-vanilla F12 installation.
As far as I can
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:08:15AM -0500, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 17:11 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
Actually not if done in conjunction with a release bump, such as we do
with a mass rebuild.
Only if we
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 03:36:14PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I'm no fan of Python either, but there is a fairly simple JSON API to
the package database. eg:
wget -O ocaml.json
'https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/ocaml?tg_format=json'
which gave me a huge
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 02:56:42PM -0500, James Laska wrote:
Greetings folks,
After careful review by Will Woods around recently discovered problems
related to preupgrading to Fedora 12, I've filed ticket#270
(https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/270) for discussion at the next
FESCO
Sorry for breaking thread:
There are definitely workarounds available, but none that meet the
criteria for preupgrade as an effortless upgrade option.
So I'm a bit confused by what is so hard here. preupgrade starts up,
finds it can't store stage2, and then tells you that you'll need to have
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 11:27:28PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Toshio Kuratomi (a.bad...@gmail.com) said:
There are definitely workarounds available, but none that meet the
criteria for preupgrade as an effortless upgrade option.
So I'm a bit confused by what is so hard here
On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 10:43:58AM -0500, Steve Grubb wrote:
On Thursday 05 November 2009 10:27:30 am Bill Nottingham wrote:
Steve Grubb (sgr...@redhat.com) said:
I have 2 bugzillas asking for %verify to be added to %config files. I am
wondering if this is a good idea at all. The issue is
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 09:33:13AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2009-10-31 at 09:29 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
That is very useful information. It sounds like I will want to do this for
this package, since enabling sse2 will turn on the sse instructions and sse2
might turn out
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 06:27:35PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
Current naming conventions for Python packages are in
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Addon_Packages_.28python_modules.29
I rather like the idea of standardizing on a python3- prefix for _all_
Python 3
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 02:37:57AM +0200, Milos Jakubicek wrote:
Newpackage (some of them even for months!):
python-decorator3
Please do not rebuild this one. It's currently just a forwards compat
package for EL-5. I'll dead.package the devel package soon.
zikula-module-filterutil
Please
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 04:46:36PM +0200, Martin Bacovsky wrote:
On Thursday 22 October 2009 16:33:06 you wrote:
I like this concept. How does it relate to tagging?
* As a replacement for tagging
* As a separate feature from tagging
* In addition to tagging where some output utilizes
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 10:11:37AM +0100, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
Hi,
Jim Parsons left Red Hat a little while back and the only contact
details I have is his Red Hat email address, which is of course no
longer valid. I've opened a bugzilla #530027 as per the unresponsive
maintainer
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 11:23:45AM -0400, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
Is there any process for handing over package ownership? I have a
package that I'm wanting to give to another maintainer. Can I simply
reassign ownership to him, or is there something else needed first?
Note, if you want to
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 12:58:39PM +0800, Steven James Drinnan wrote:
I recently installed gestikk. And to my horror one of the dialogs said.
(Check Box) F*** off
No lie,
So how does one recommend that this be removed.
What we'll probably do is patch the code to have a less obscene
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 10:29:46PM +0200, Haïkel Guémar wrote:
Le 16/10/2009 19:19, Toshio Kuratomi a écrit :
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 12:58:39PM +0800, Steven James Drinnan wrote:
I recently installed gestikk. And to my horror one of the dialogs said.
(Check Box) F*** off
No lie
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 08:59:13AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Conrad Meyer ceme...@u.washington.edu
wrote:
If they're not on any of the official spins, what benefit does tagging them
into dist-f12 provide over having them as updates? (Pushing updates is
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 12:52:30PM +0100, Mat Booth wrote:
I was unaware of all this. Is there a reason why the setuptools author
will not grant commit rights to others? Going solely on your email it
seems like a fork would be unnecessary if he was willing to share the
workload...
He
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 01:21:38PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
atropine:~% repoquery --whatprovides 'pkgconfig(xext)'
libXext-devel-0:1.0.99.4-3.fc12.i686
atropine:~% repoquery --requires libXext-devel | grep pkg
pkgconfig
pkgconfig(x11)
pkgconfig(xextproto)
So, whatever. Clearly the
I've been a comaintainer of the python-setuptools package for a long time
and recently became the owner when icon relinquished it. It is currently a
tumultuous time for distributing python modules with a new and active
maintainer for distutils inside of the python stdlib and a fork of
setuptools
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 10:17:16AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2009-10-10 at 18:05 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 07:47:59 -0700, Adam wrote:
Of course, that turns the larger question into 'why do we put i686
-devel packages in the x86-64 repo, not just
So I just read this piece of news on the distutils-sig list. Here's a
summary/background.
setuptools has become increasingly popular as a method of making python
modules easier to package (by upstream), managing plugins, and getting
version requirements right. However, the setuptools author has
On 10/02/2009 04:53 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
A important oddness of the feature process is that it is not actually
necessary for the feature to be in the distribution. So you send a nag
mail, feature owners ignores it, you drop the feature and the
functionality is still there. So unless the
Hi,
Anyone want to trade reviews for two zikula packages? We want to get
them approved and in so that Fedora Insight can be deployed with them
for Fedora 12. Mel Chua and Rahul are in charge of them but I packaged
one of them and the other I reworked a bit. I don't feel comfortable
reviewing
On 10/02/2009 08:48 AM, Colin Walters wrote:
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 9:20 AM, Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com wrote:
*BSD, fellow GNU/Linux distro like Debian [...] are able to ship multiples
python stacks
In Debian's case of course there are actually *two* separate Python systems
;)
On 10/02/2009 02:28 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
Since yum is available during build, this would work (but is fugly):
- build as normal
- push out python2 files to buildroot
- after everything else is done, yum remove python-devel yum
install python3-devel
- build python3 modules
On 10/01/2009 03:10 AM, Josephine Tannhäuser wrote:
2009/9/14 Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com
Hi, everyone. We - the QA group - have recently been researching the
feasibility of using zsync to reduce the size of live image downloads.
This has hit a roadblock in the form of the problem
On 10/01/2009 09:42 AM, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
2009/10/1 Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com:
A) You're a coder and want to get your hands dirty with the rsync
protocol. Check out how librsync manages to use the system zlib and if
possible to do this compatibly, apply it to zsync and rsync
On 10/01/2009 11:11 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Oct 1, 2009, at 10:59, Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 01:15:09PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
Scoping:
- this work would target Fedora 13. I'd avoid pushing it into F12
until it's proven safe to do so
I'm
On 10/01/2009 10:15 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
Proposal: Python 3 in Fedora 13
Evolutionary, not revolutionary: build a python 3 stack
parallel-installable with the python 2 stack.
First: Overall +1.
Note: liberally snipped, throughout.
= Proposal =
Where I would draw the line is on
On 09/30/2009 10:43 AM, Michael Schroeder wrote:
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 10:27:44AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
So... that means the custom zlib isn't necessary to the proper operation
of deltarpm, correct? I haven't looked at where in the code this is
being used yet but I'm guessing
On 09/29/2009 09:24 AM, James Antill wrote:
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 08:07 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On 09/29/2009 05:00 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 09/29/2009 05:14 PM, Josephine Tannhäuser wrote:
Seems that violations of the guidelines are not so important like the
violation
On 09/30/2009 11:34 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On 09/30/2009 10:43 AM, Michael Schroeder wrote:
AFAIK the current rpm uses the system's zlib library, so the
deltarpm copy is also no longer needed for Fedora.
Interesting. That's slightly puzzling though. That would mean that
deltarpm
On 09/29/2009 05:00 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 09/29/2009 05:14 PM, Josephine Tannhäuser wrote:
Seems that violations of the guidelines are not so important like the
violation of the Trademark (The hunting of fedora related sites, like
blogs or forums with adhesions contracts)... Are the
On 09/29/2009 11:37 AM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
Hi,
Oolite http://oolite.org is currently undergoing review, and a
stumbling block is in its use of its own copy of libjs. An upstream
developer is participating in the review and has a clear explanation
for the rationale:
On 09/29/2009 12:51 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 2:33 AM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
Hello,
the sugar-pippy rpm in Fedora depends on pygame, which is used by some
of the examples.
So far, so good, but pygame in turn depends on numpy, a 7.7MB package
On 09/29/2009 01:52 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
I admit I'm not following sugar and numpy discussions too closely so I
might have missed it but I don't remember this. I do remember talking
about removing the numpy
On 09/29/2009 02:11 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
rawhide, I think the numpy support was just dropped from pygtk2 as
opposed to fixing the dependencies in numpy themselves. numpy still
depends on atlas and various other stuff. I'm not sure what the impact
of either changes are, I'd have to dig
On 09/29/2009 05:38 PM, Steve Dickson wrote:
On 09/29/2009 08:17 PM, John Poelstra wrote:
[...snip...]
I want to be perfectly clear that I'm not sounding an all clear on
this by any means. If your answer here means that this change hasn't
been thoroughly tested, you're going to have a hard
On 09/23/2009 09:46 PM, James Antill wrote:
On Wed, 2009-09-23 at 17:22 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
This is all under the assumption, that delta rpm creation from a xz
compressed rpm to a gzip compressed rpm works.
Yeh, I don't know the answer to that. I'd _guess_ that it would work,
but
On 09/22/2009 02:43 AM, Martin Gieseking wrote:
Am 21.09.2009 23:24, Till Maas wrote:
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 04:58:32PM -0400, Casey Dahlin wrote:
On 09/21/2009 04:04 PM, Till Maas wrote:
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 08:47:24PM +0200, Martin Gieseking wrote:
during the review of ncrack
Hi, is jgranado reading this list or anyone know where he is?
We're having a problem with the way he's setup his FAS account and
bugzilla account. If he can get in touch with me I can straighten
everything out. If not, we'll eventually need to orphan his packages to
stop the errors we're
On 09/17/2009 07:48 AM, R P Herrold wrote:
2009/7/13 Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com:
The Infrastructure group has a rather ongoing project to try and find a
really good calendar server system (and then, obviously, package it)
...
It's proved a bit tricky, though, to find a really
On 09/17/2009 10:07 AM, Scott McCarty wrote:
All,
I am working on distributing a log analysis utility wrote called petit
(http://opensource.eyemg.com/index.php/Petit). Currently, I am treating it
more like a regular application than a python module because it comes with
On 09/16/2009 12:42 AM, Tomas Mraz wrote:
On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 14:01 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On 09/15/2009 01:29 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
Sorry but the packager may have no way to influence upstream.
And to be honest having a huge patch against rsync and/or zsync to
extract a library
On 09/16/2009 08:39 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 08:10 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
This is a logical leap. rsync has forked zlib but they are only using
the fork internally. 2 and 3 get that fork out in the open so that
more
than one program can use it. 2 and 3
On 09/15/2009 04:44 AM, Josephine Tannhäuser wrote:
Hey,
I googled for it and found Karims blogpost and Simon aka kassamedias answer
(comment 3)
http://kparal.wordpress.com/2009/09/01/zsync-transfer-large-files-efficiently/
I will note that the reply is not quite right. We can have
On 09/15/2009 01:10 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
This would be great if maintainers were willing to fix issues after the
fact. Look at rsync -- there's no incentive to fix the library issue at
this point because rsync is already in the distribution. We need to fix
On 09/10/2009 05:14 AM, Martin Gieseking wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to see the distributed SCM Fossil (www.fossil-scm.org)
packaged for Fedora because I find the concept of the tool quite
attractive. There was already a review request for it in bugzilla:
Over the past few months, Fedora Infrastructure has been discussing
having a consistent set of licenses for applications and scripts we
create for Fedora. The goals of doing this were to
* Be able to share code among the various programs that we write.
* Not have our libraries force a specific
On 09/02/2009 08:47 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Michel Alexandre Salim (michael.silva...@gmail.com) said:
Multi-ownership seems *far* preferable to me than using triggers to
move files around, or moving a prelink-specific directory to the base
filesystem package.
Then the guidelines should
On 08/26/2009 02:33 AM, drago01 wrote:
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Martin Bacovskymbaco...@redhat.com wrote:
On Monday 24 August 2009 14:36:09 drago01 wrote:
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Toshio Kuratomia.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/23/2009 10:50 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Aren't
On 08/24/2009 07:31 AM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 14:36 +0200, drago01 wrote:
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Toshio Kuratomia.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/23/2009 10:50 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Aren't we pitching Fedora Community interface as the end user facing
thing,
On 08/23/2009 10:06 AM, Michel Salim wrote:
Hi Adam,
Thanks for the wonderful fedora-pkgdb search engine! I was wondering --
since it's a standard opensearch plugin, whether it would be a good idea
or not to make it auto-discoverable on *.fedoraproject.org, especially
On 08/23/2009 10:50 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Aren't we pitching Fedora Community interface as the end user facing
thing, going forward? It seems some of these features will overlap or
duplicate it.
It's possible. The packagedb is going to be the backend for the Fedora
Community Front end
On 08/20/2009 04:18 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:19:39AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
Is it just me or are there some packages that seem to be eternally on
this list? beage/f-spot/tomboy never seem to go anywhere.
They're eternally broken on ppc64. Mostly due to Mono
On 08/16/2009 11:52 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 00:30:31 +0900, Mamoru wrote:
Michael Schwendt wrote, at 08/16/2009 11:47 PM +9:00:
On Sun, 16 Aug 2009 22:39:37 +0900, Mamoru wrote:
Michael Schwendt wrote, at 08/16/2009 09:29 PM +9:00:
On Sun, 16 Aug 2009 14:04:14
On 08/10/2009 12:36 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
pygtk2 implements a function called gtk.gdk.get_pixels_array(), which
returns the pixel contents of a GDK pixbuf as a numpy array. Fine and
dandy, but this means it links against numpy (7 megs) which is itself
linked against atlas (12 megs). Kind
On 08/06/2009 09:43 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 09:24 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
We either have to make it clear which policy we use and which policy we
don't, and hence which theoretical user base we are not targeting, or
take on extra work and try to satisfy both. I am
On 08/05/2009 11:47 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
And maintainers can choose whether or not they
want to take on the work of shipping updates in the adventurous
repository.
How does this work? It would seem that the adventurous repository would
be mandatory as something that changes ABI would
On 08/05/2009 12:11 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 11:58 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Also, having the expectation that the other repository is for security
updates doesn't address the problem of a security release breaking ABI.
That's rather unlikely (well, except
On 08/05/2009 01:04 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 12:44 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Sure, this is comparable to the present situation. But it doesn't seem
like it makes things much better.
* It doesn't solve the original poster's issue (that the GNOME stack
isn't
On 08/05/2009 02:26 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 13:25 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Sure. I'm just pointing out that you're trying to solve a different
problem than either the original poster or Thorsten. (And now that I
understand your problem better, perhaps yours
On 08/03/2009 02:19 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
The following packages in the repository suffer from broken dependencies:
==
The results in this summary consider Test Updates!
On 07/31/2009 01:01 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 01:20:12AM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 08/01/2009 01:14 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Sat, 2009-08-01 at 00:58 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
I don't think anybody is going to argue that extracting source from srpm
or pulling
On 07/31/2009 01:47 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 02:00:10AM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Even if they do want to go to this extend, we don't need to grant them
special exceptions. We can recommend that the projects used a proper
project hosting facility and leave it at that.
On 07/31/2009 01:48 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 01:09:43PM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Sat, 2009-08-01 at 01:20 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
That's kind of side tracking though. Point is that SRPM as upstream
source is simply a stupid thing. We would complain loudly or
python-fedora-0.3.14 is the last release that will be GPLv2.
Future releases will be LGPLv2+. This is a move to a more permissive
license so there shouldn't be any new incompatibilities.
-Toshio
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
On 07/29/2009 01:59 AM, Till Maas wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 01:54:20PM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
It was in my post to the last thread::
Is someone in a position to verify whether setting security flags on a
bug prevents someone who would be put in the CC list by the default cc
On 07/29/2009 08:20 AM, Till Maas wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 07:12:00AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On 07/29/2009 07:05 AM, Till Maas wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 06:30:27AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Is the same thing true of watching a person? till, I'm now watching
till
On 07/29/2009 08:41 PM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
2009/7/29 Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com:
Okay, please test this with a package that has people on the initial CC
list so we've tested precisely the behaviour people are concerned about.
If the initialcclist is not set when a security bug
/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/67465
(2007-10-26, started by Toshio Kuratomi)
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/94641
(2008-10-12, started by Patrice Dumas)
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/116848
(2009-07-06, started by me)
--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov
On 07/28/2009 03:48 PM, Mat Booth wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Mat Boothfed...@matbooth.co.uk wrote:
Well, we should probably make sure maven still works since a bunch of
projects probably depend on this to build, so I can take these.
I'm fast becoming a one man Java SIG. :-/
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
