Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
> That's to be expected, as "rpm -i" installs a package without removing
> the old one. Unless the package is specially designed (like the
> kernel) you'll get conflicts. Normally, you'd want to use "rpm -U"
> which will remove the old package before installing the new one.
On Tue, 2009-12-22 at 09:18 -0600, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Linuxguy123 wrote:
> >
> > As for installation, doing a straight rpm -i over the -beta6 install
> > resulted in a slew of error messages regarding file conflicts. I did a
> > yum remove digikam and then an
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Linuxguy123 wrote:
>
> As for installation, doing a straight rpm -i over the -beta6 install
> resulted in a slew of error messages regarding file conflicts. I did a
> yum remove digikam and then an rpm -i and everything worked fine.
That's to be expected, as "rpm
On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 11:46 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Linuxguy123 wrote:
>
> > digiKam 1.0.0 was released today. I think a lot of us are running
> > 1.0-beta 6 installed via yum. Would it be possible to get 1.0.0 into
> > F12 stable prior to Christmas ?
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/up
On 12/22/2009 09:15 AM, Ryan Rix wrote:
On Mon 21 December 2009 10:46:51 am Rex Dieter wrote:
I'd feel a bit uncomfortable without at least some
testing and positive feedback.
Once people try testing Rex's updated package, please provide feedback
at Rex's link about it, eg what's working, n
On Mon 21 December 2009 10:46:51 am Rex Dieter wrote:
> I'd feel a bit uncomfortable without at least some
> testing and positive feedback.
>
Big +1 there.
--
Ryan Rix
Fedora KDE SIG Member, Phoenix AZ Ambassador, News KDE Beat writer
New Mail address: phrkonale...@gmail.com -> r...@n.rix.si
Linuxguy123 wrote:
> digiKam 1.0.0 was released today. I think a lot of us are running
> 1.0-beta 6 installed via yum. Would it be possible to get 1.0.0 into
> F12 stable prior to Christmas ?
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/digikam-1.0.0-1.fc12
stable that quickly? I'd feel a bit unco
digiKam 1.0.0 was released today. I think a lot of us are running
1.0-beta 6 installed via yum. Would it be possible to get 1.0.0 into
F12 stable prior to Christmas ?
I know I can build it from source, but I need to install it on several
machines and it would be much easier to do it via a yum u
