On Thursday 22 October 2009 07:29:49 pm Milos Jakubicek wrote:
Hi,
snip
Not a primary arch package (should the package be blocked in the primary
arch kojihub?)
==
prtconf
silo
xorg-x11-drv-sunffb
There are much more of them! I don't know whether it is
On 10/20/2009 08:48 PM, Milos Jakubicek wrote:
http://mjakubicek.fedorapeople.org/need-rebuild.html
hmmn, glglobe is mine, wonder what went wrong.
It seems that the build logs are no longer available ?
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1504772
eg for: x86_64 (red)
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 02:37:57AM +0200, Milos Jakubicek wrote:
Newpackage (some of them even for months!):
python-decorator3
Please do not rebuild this one. It's currently just a forwards compat
package for EL-5. I'll dead.package the devel package soon.
zikula-module-filterutil
Please
On 25.10.2009 08:18, David Timms wrote:
On 10/20/2009 08:48 PM, Milos Jakubicek wrote:
http://mjakubicek.fedorapeople.org/need-rebuild.html
hmmn, glglobe is mine, wonder what went wrong.
It seems that the build logs are no longer available ?
No, they are kept only for 14(?) days or so.
Next bunch built, it's a complete set of those with mock exit status 30
(I'm curious what does this exit status mean, missing prerequisity is
denoted by 10) and some others too:
piggyback-2.6.26-4.fc12 (on sparc)
perl-Perl-Critic-1.105-1.fc12
glglobe-0.2-8.fc12
libica-2.0.2-1.fc12 (on s390)
On Sat, 2009-10-24 at 02:37 +0200, Milos Jakubicek wrote:
ssmtp
(don't know why it is on the list, need to consult)
ssmtp is on the list because the build target of the task in koji (
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1634633 ) is
dist-f12-openssl, which is not one of the
On 22.10.2009 03:39, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Milos Jakubicek wrote:
Most probably those are the packages which failed during the mass
rebuild...there are still plenty of them:
http://mjakubicek.fedorapeople.org/need-rebuild.html
That list is out of date. I fixed clutter-gtkmm to build a while
OK, I took the 3 hours today and went through the packages which have
not been submitted at all for building:
On 22.10.2009 19:29, Quentin Armitage wrote:
Not submitted for rebuild (65)
==
I've successfully rebuilt (and requested tagging for dist-f12):
- at
On Mon, 2009-10-19 at 20:20 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
Hi All,
I thought with the mass rebuild the i586 rpms were suppose to be gone
but it seems the F-12 repository still has quite a few of them. Are
the old packages that should have been blocked, ones that's that
weren't rebuilt
Hi,
On 22.10.2009 19:29, Quentin Armitage wrote:
1. Is the script that is run and produces the output at
http://jkeating.fedorapeople.org/needed-f12-rebuilds.html actually the
script referred to at the bottom of that page
(https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/browser/scripts) ? The reason I ask is
Milos Jakubicek wrote:
Most probably those are the packages which failed during the mass
rebuild...there are still plenty of them:
http://mjakubicek.fedorapeople.org/need-rebuild.html
That list is out of date. I fixed clutter-gtkmm to build a while ago because
it had broken dependencies,
Hi,
On 10/19/2009 09:20 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
Hi All,
I thought with the mass rebuild the i586 rpms were suppose to be gone
but it seems the F-12 repository still has quite a few of them. Are
the old packages that should have been blocked, ones that's that
weren't rebuilt for some reason
On 10/20/2009 03:48 AM, Milos Jakubicek wrote:
Hi,
On 10/19/2009 09:20 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
Hi All,
I thought with the mass rebuild the i586 rpms were suppose to be gone
but it seems the F-12 repository still has quite a few of them. Are
the old packages that should have been blocked
Orion Poplawski (or...@cora.nwra.com) said:
I just rebuilt:
itcl-3.4-5.fc12 - no changes from original failed rebuild
irda-utils-0.9.18-10.fc12 - added a minor patch to fix install issue
xfconf-4.6.1-4.fc12 - added missing BRs
Does it make sense to tag them into F-12 at this point?
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 10:47:50 -0600
Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com wrote:
...snip...
I just rebuilt:
...snip...
xfconf-4.6.1-4.fc12 - added missing BRs
Wow. I didn't know this was still an issue. I thought I fixed this long
ago. ;(
Thanks very much for fixing it!
kevin
Hi All,
I thought with the mass rebuild the i586 rpms were suppose to be gone
but it seems the F-12 repository still has quite a few of them. Are
the old packages that should have been blocked, ones that's that
weren't rebuilt for some reason or something that I've just missed?
Peter
--
fedora
16 matches
Mail list logo
