Daniel J Walsh (dwa...@redhat.com) said:
On 11/04/2009 01:38 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Because seedit getting installed causes selinux-policy-targeted and
friends to get screwed up.
That sounds like a reason to not ship seedit. Am I missing something?
Bill
I would not ship
On 11/04/2009 01:38 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Because seedit getting installed causes selinux-policy-targeted and friends
to get screwed up.
That sounds like a reason to not ship seedit. Am I missing something?
Bill
I would not ship it.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
RK == Rudolf Kastl che...@gmail.com writes:
RK 2. qstat and torque-client both provide a qstat binary... is there
RK anything done to get that resolved upstream? or is it a conflicts
RK and forget scenario?
This one, I think, should be easily resolvable with alternatives.
Actually I think all
On 11/04/2009 08:14 AM, Rudolf Kastl wrote:
Why do those packages have to conflict with each other?
1. seedit and selinux-policy-{targeted,mls} - i dont see a single
file conflicting atleast with the targeted policy...
2. qstat and torque-client both provide a qstat binary... is there
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III ti...@math.uh.edu wrote:
RK == Rudolf Kastl che...@gmail.com writes:
RK 2. qstat and torque-client both provide a qstat binary... is there
RK anything done to get that resolved upstream? or is it a conflicts
RK and forget scenario?
This
ST == Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch writes:
ST Would be happy for an alternatives solution. I have yet another
ST /usr/bin/qstat for a POSIX interface to batch on the way at some
ST point.
Turns out that the other queuing systems (torque and gridengine) have
already renamed their qstat
2009/11/4 Jason L Tibbitts III ti...@math.uh.edu:
ST == Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch writes:
ST Would be happy for an alternatives solution. I have yet another
ST /usr/bin/qstat for a POSIX interface to batch on the way at some
ST point.
Turns out that the other queuing systems
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Rudolf Kastl che...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/11/4 Jason L Tibbitts III ti...@math.uh.edu:
ST == Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch writes:
ST Would be happy for an alternatives solution. I have yet another
ST /usr/bin/qstat for a POSIX interface to batch on the
2009/11/4 Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch:
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Rudolf Kastl che...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/11/4 Jason L Tibbitts III ti...@math.uh.edu:
ST == Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch writes:
ST Would be happy for an alternatives solution. I have yet another
ST
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Rudolf Kastl che...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/11/4 Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch:
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Rudolf Kastl che...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/11/4 Jason L Tibbitts III ti...@math.uh.edu:
ST == Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch writes:
ST
2009/11/4 Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch:
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Rudolf Kastl che...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/11/4 Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch:
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Rudolf Kastl che...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/11/4 Jason L Tibbitts III ti...@math.uh.edu:
ST == Steve
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Rudolf Kastl che...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/11/4 Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch:
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Rudolf Kastl che...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/11/4 Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch:
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Rudolf Kastl che...@gmail.com
bug against qstat filed: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533016
as for seedit: i am going to investigate it further.
kind regards,
Rudolf Kastl
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Because seedit getting installed causes selinux-policy-targeted and friends
to get screwed up.
That sounds like a reason to not ship seedit. Am I missing something?
Bill
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
2009/11/4 Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com:
Because seedit getting installed causes selinux-policy-targeted and friends
to get screwed up.
That sounds like a reason to not ship seedit. Am I missing something?
on first start of the seedit-gui there is a popup:
you have to initialize before
15 matches
Mail list logo
