Rgds
Gary
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vsevolod
(Simon) Ilyushchenko
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2005 3:36 AM
To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project.
Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Database recreation,automount
Vsevolod (Simon) Ilyushchenko wrote:
Rich,
What problems did you have? I'm not sure what you did, or what you
could have done to necessitate a reinstall.
The second LDAP server I've created would not start before the
reinstall, but I can't replicate this problem any more. I was also
abl
Ben Steeves wrote on 07/13/2005 04:13 PM:
On 7/13/05, Vsevolod (Simon) Ilyushchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
3) Finally, the Java administration console is extremely slow. I'm
running over an SSH connection, but my server is a 2.8 Ghz machine with
512 Mb of RAM. I wonder what console perfo
Rich,
What problems did you have? I'm not sure what you did, or what you
could have done to necessitate a reinstall.
The second LDAP server I've created would not start before the
reinstall, but I can't replicate this problem any more. I was also able
to add a top-level organizational unit
On 7/13/05, Vsevolod (Simon) Ilyushchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 3) Finally, the Java administration console is extremely slow. I'm
> running over an SSH connection, but my server is a 2.8 Ghz machine with
> 512 Mb of RAM. I wonder what console performance other people experience.
Try using
Vsevolod (Simon) Ilyushchenko wrote:
Rich,
Thanks for the quick answer! Perhaps this information should go into
the FAQ - what do you think?
Rich Megginson wrote on 07/13/2005 12:47 PM:
The IETF LDAP community has decided to deprecated them in favor of
the new netgroups stuff.
OK, I'll
Vsevolod (Simon) Ilyushchenko wrote:
Switching tabs and in particular browsing the data. We only have a few
hundred users, and it takes the GUI about 5 seconds to show the first
batch of users (about 15), and the performance does not improve even
after the whole list is loaded - clicking and s
David Boreham wrote on 07/13/2005 02:21 PM:
Console performance is great for me. There should be
no performance problems per se on that hardware.
What operations in particular seem slow ?
Switching tabs and in particular browsing the data. We only have a few
hundred users, and it takes the GU
Rich,
Thanks for the quick answer! Perhaps this information should go into the
FAQ - what do you think?
Rich Megginson wrote on 07/13/2005 12:47 PM:
The IETF LDAP community has decided to deprecated them in favor of the
new netgroups stuff.
OK, I'll reconfigure my entries. Does Fedora autom
3) Finally, the Java administration console is extremely slow. I'm
running over an SSH connection, but my server is a 2.8 Ghz machine
with 512 Mb of RAM. I wonder what console performance other people
experience.
Console performance is great for me. There should be
no performance problems
The IETF LDAP community has decided to deprecated them in favor of the
new netgroups stuff.
I thought automount, automountInformation, etc. were the most current
way to store automount mappings in a directory. They still appear in
the RFC2307bis draft:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/dr
Vsevolod (Simon) Ilyushchenko wrote:
Hi,
I'm extremely glad FDS is now freely available and almost open-source.
I have run into some issues when I started playing with it.
1. I've tried to port my OpenLDAP database to it and found that that
there is no automount objectclass specified by def
12 matches
Mail list logo
