[Bug 480466] [openoffice.org] Adapt to font package renamings

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480466 Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 477435] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477435 Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 480477] [vdr-skins] Adapt to font package renamings

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480477 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-19 05:25:02 EDT --- [Natural language informal

[Bug 480468] [php-ZendFramework] Adapt to font package renamings

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480468 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-19 05:24:55 EDT --- [Natural language informal

[Bug 480472] [seahorse-adventures] Adapt to font package renamings

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480472 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-19 05:24:58 EDT --- [Natural language informal

[Bug 480445] [cinepaint] Adapt to font package renamings

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480445 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 480481] [xplanet] Adapt to font package renamings

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480481 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-19 05:25:08 EDT --- [Natural language informal

[Bug 480447] [e16-docs] Adapt to font package renamings

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480447 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-19 05:24:34 EDT --- [Natural language informal

[Bug 480476] [trackballs] Adapt to font package renamings

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480476 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-19 05:25:01 EDT --- [Natural language informal

[Bug 477461] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461 Sarantis Paskalis paska...@di.uoa.gr changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 480461] [mapnik] Adapt to font package renamings

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480461 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-19 05:24:48 EDT --- [Natural language informal

[Bug 480465] [ogre] Adapt to font package renamings

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480465 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-19 05:24:52 EDT --- [Natural language informal

[Bug 480455] [ftgl] Adapt to font package renamings

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480455 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-19 05:24:42 EDT --- [Natural language informal

[Bug 480449] [ember-media] Adapt to font package renamings

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480449 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-19 05:24:37 EDT --- [Natural language informal

[Bug 480450] [fbida] Adapt to font package renamings

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480450 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-19 05:24:38 EDT --- [Natural language informal

[Bug 480458] [hedgewars] Adapt to font package renamings

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480458 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-19 05:24:46 EDT --- [Natural language informal

[Bug 480462] [mapserver] Adapt to font package renamings

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480462 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-19 05:24:49 EDT --- [Natural language informal

[Bug 480471] [scorched3d] Adapt to font package renamings

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480471 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-19 05:24:57 EDT --- [Natural language informal

[Bug 477425] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477425 Sarantis Paskalis paska...@di.uoa.gr changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 480478] [vodovod] Adapt to font package renamings

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480478 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-19 05:25:03 EDT --- [Natural language informal

[Bug 477462] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477462 Sarantis Paskalis paska...@di.uoa.gr changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 477462] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477462 --- Comment #7 from Sarantis Paskalis paska...@di.uoa.gr 2009-01-19 06:25:22 EDT --- Opened up a review request for the

[Bug 477448] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477448 Hedayat Vatankhah heda...@grad.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 480457] [gramps] Adapt to font package renamings

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480457 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-19 05:24:45 EDT --- [Natural language informal

[Bug 477461] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461 --- Comment #17 from Sarantis Paskalis paska...@di.uoa.gr 2009-01-19 06:23:07 EDT --- Opened up a review request for the

[Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477425, which changed state. Bug 477425 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

[Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477448, which changed state. Bug 477448 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

[Bug 480453] [foobillard] Adapt to font package renamings

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480453 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-19 05:24:40 EDT --- [Natural language informal

[Bug 480480] [xmoto] Adapt to font package renamings

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480480 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-19 05:25:06 EDT --- [Natural language informal

[Bug 480479] [wormux] Adapt to font package renamings

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480479 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-19 05:25:05 EDT --- [Natural language informal

[Bug 480473] [slingshot] Adapt to font package renamings

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480473 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-19 05:24:59 EDT --- [Natural language informal

[Bug 480467] [perl-PDF-API2] Adapt to font package renamings

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480467 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-19 05:24:53 EDT --- [Natural language informal

[Bug 480446] [e16] Adapt to font package renamings

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480446 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-19 05:24:33 EDT --- [Natural language informal

[Bug 480475] [TnL-data] Adapt to font package renamings

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480475 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-19 05:25:00 EDT --- [Natural language informal

[Bug 480459] [libprojectM] Adapt to font package renamings

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480459 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-19 05:24:47 EDT --- [Natural language informal

[Bug 480469] [plplot] Adapt to font package renamings

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480469 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-19 05:24:56 EDT --- [Natural language informal

[Bug 480448] [egoboo-data] Adapt to font package renamings

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480448 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-19 05:24:35 EDT --- [Natural language informal

[Bug 480454] [freedink] Adapt to font package renamings

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480454 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-19 05:24:41 EDT --- [Natural language informal

[Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Bug 480443 depends on bug 480478, which changed state. Bug 480478 Summary: [vodovod] Adapt to font package renamings

[Bug 480478] [vodovod] Adapt to font package renamings

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480478 Karel Volný kvo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 480477] [vdr-skins] Adapt to font package renamings

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480477 --- Comment #4 from Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi 2009-01-19 13:54:08 EDT --- Please see comment 2, I don't think it's

[Bug 480669] New: baekmuk-ttf-fonts-* scriptlet failure during yum update

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: baekmuk-ttf-fonts-* scriptlet failure during yum update https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480669 Summary: baekmuk-ttf-fonts-* scriptlet failure

[Bug 480669] baekmuk-ttf-fonts-* scriptlet failure during yum update

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480669 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 480512] fontconfig - fc-cache refuses to write caches

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480512 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 480669] baekmuk-ttf-fonts-* scriptlet failure during yum update

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480669 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 480685] New: fontforge multilib conflict

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: fontforge multilib conflict https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480685 Summary: fontforge multilib conflict Product: Fedora

[Bug 477458] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477458 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-19 16:23:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) –

rpms/fontconfig/devel .cvsignore, 1.31, 1.32 fontconfig.spec, 1.113, 1.114 sources, 1.32, 1.33

2009-01-19 Thread Behdad Esfahbod
Author: behdad Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv18177 Modified Files: .cvsignore fontconfig.spec sources Log Message: * Mon Jan 19 2009 Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com - * 2.6.91-1.git.64.g9feaf34 - Update to

[Bug 480512] fontconfig - fc-cache refuses to write caches

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480512 Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477448, which changed state. Bug 477448 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

[Bug 477448] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477448 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477425, which changed state. Bug 477425 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

[Bug 477425] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477425 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Bug 480443 depends on bug 480470, which changed state. Bug 480470 Summary: [publican] Adapt to font package renamings

[Bug 480470] [publican] Adapt to font package renamings

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480470 Jeff Fearn jfe...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 477373] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477373 Bug 477373 depends on bug 253813, which changed state. Bug 253813 Summary: Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from

[Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese)

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) [renamed to cjkuni-fonts]

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

rpms/fontconfig/devel .cvsignore, 1.32, 1.33 fontconfig.spec, 1.114, 1.115 sources, 1.33, 1.34

2009-01-19 Thread Behdad Esfahbod
Author: behdad Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv5431 Modified Files: .cvsignore fontconfig.spec sources Log Message: * Mon Jan 19 2009 Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com - * 2.6.92-1.git.64.g167bb82 - Update to

[Bug 480470] [publican] Adapt to font package renamings

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480470 Jeff Fearn jfe...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477410, which changed state. Bug 477410 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

[Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 Caius CHANCE ccha...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 Caius CHANCE ccha...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 Caius CHANCE ccha...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 --- Comment #9 from Caius kaio Chance ccha...@redhat.com 2009-01-19 21:18:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) And that's

rpms/liberation-fonts/devel liberation-fonts.spec,1.29,1.30

2009-01-19 Thread Caius Chance
Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/liberation-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv29125 Modified Files: liberation-fonts.spec Log Message: * Tue Jan 20 2009 Caius Chance ccha...@redhat.com - 1.04.93-5.fc11 - Resolved: rhbz#477410 - Refined .spec file

rpms/liberation-fonts/devel liberation-fonts.spec,1.30,1.31

2009-01-19 Thread Caius Chance
Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/liberation-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv29669 Modified Files: liberation-fonts.spec Log Message: updated release num Index: liberation-fonts.spec

rpms/liberation-fonts/devel 65-liberation-mono.conf, 1.1, NONE 65-liberation-sans.conf, 1.1, NONE 65-liberation-serif.conf, 1.1, NONE

2009-01-19 Thread Caius Chance
Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/liberation-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv31036 Removed Files: 65-liberation-mono.conf 65-liberation-sans.conf 65-liberation-serif.conf Log Message: removed uncessary fontconfig files ---

[Bug 480512] fontconfig - fc-cache refuses to write caches

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480512 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec,1.9,1.10

2009-01-19 Thread Caius Chance
Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv765 Modified Files: baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec Log Message: * Tue Jan 20 2009 Caius Chance ccha...@redhat.com - 2.2-14.fc11 - Resolves: rhbz#477332 - Refined according to

[Bug 477332] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477332 Caius kaio Chance ccha...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477332, which changed state. Bug 477332 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

[Bug 477458] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477458 --- Comment #8 from Rajeesh rajeeshknamb...@gmail.com 2009-01-19 22:28:55 EDT --- Ah, my bad! Will fix them all soon. I

[Bug 477373] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477373 Bug 477373 depends on bug 253813, which changed state. Bug 253813 Summary: Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from

[Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) [renamed to cjkuni-fonts]

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) [renamed to cjkuni-fonts]

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 --- Comment #39 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-01-20 02:30:46 EDT --- Nicolas, then better to open new review

Broken dependencies: baekmuk-ttf-fonts

2009-01-19 Thread buildsys
baekmuk-ttf-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: baekmuk-ttf-hline-fonts-2.2-14.fc11.noarch requires baekmuk-ttf-common-fonts = 0:2.2-14.fc11 On x86_64: baekmuk-ttf-hline-fonts-2.2-14.fc11.noarch requires baekmuk-ttf-common-fonts = 0:2.2-14.fc11 On

Broken dependencies: liberation-fonts

2009-01-19 Thread buildsys
liberation-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: liberation-sans-fonts-1.04.93-5.fc11.noarch requires liberation-common-fonts = 0:1.04.93-5.fc11 On x86_64: liberation-sans-fonts-1.04.93-5.fc11.noarch requires liberation-common-fonts = 0:1.04.93-5.fc11

Broken dependencies: tetex-font-cm-lgc

2009-01-19 Thread buildsys
tetex-font-cm-lgc has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: tetex-font-cm-lgc-0.5-11.fc11.noarch requires cm-lgc-fonts On x86_64: tetex-font-cm-lgc-0.5-11.fc11.noarch requires cm-lgc-fonts On i386: tetex-font-cm-lgc-0.5-11.fc11.noarch requires cm-lgc-fonts