[Bug 394103] All elements are HUGE (when doing dpi autodetect?)

2009-05-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394103 --- Comment #92 from Robert O'Callahan (:roc) (Mozilla Corporation) r...@ocallahan.org 2009-05-05 23:38:29 PDT --- Please file a new bug for Windows. This patch was fixed as

[Bug 488398] ghostscript files referred to outdated font info

2009-05-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488398 Hin-Tak Leung ht...@users.sourceforge.net changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 499345] New: [kn_IN][Pango] GSUB U+0CB0 U+200D U+0CCD U+0C95 font has error.

2009-05-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [kn_IN][Pango] GSUB U+0CB0 U+200D U+0CCD U+0C95 font has error. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499345 Summary: [kn_IN][Pango] GSUB U+0CB0 U+200D

[Bug 499345] [kn_IN][Pango] GSUB U+0CB0 U+200D U+0CCD U+0C95 font has error.

2009-05-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499345 --- Comment #1 from koka xiong kxi...@redhat.com 2009-05-06 06:21:42 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=342626) --

[Bug 499349] New: Backspace has wrong function in Assamese Codepoint.

2009-05-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Backspace has wrong function in Assamese Codepoint. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499349 Summary: Backspace has wrong function in Assamese

[Bug 499349] Backspace has wrong function in Assamese Codepoint.

2009-05-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499349 --- Comment #1 from XinSun xin...@redhat.com 2009-05-06 06:28:51 EDT --- The version of pango :

[Bug 499345] [kn_IN][Pango] GSUB U+0CB0 U+200D U+0CCD U+0C95 font has error.

2009-05-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499345 --- Comment #2 from koka xiong kxi...@redhat.com 2009-05-06 06:38:27 EDT --- the Version-Release number of selected

[Bug 488398] ghostscript files referred to outdated font info

2009-05-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488398 --- Comment #12 from Hin-Tak Leung ht...@users.sourceforge.net 2009-05-06 06:46:56 EDT --- I have already tried fc-cache

[Bug 499357] [kn_IN][Pango] GSUB U+0CA4 U+0CCD U+0CB0 has error

2009-05-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499357 --- Comment #1 from koka xiong kxi...@redhat.com 2009-05-06 06:45:51 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=342628) --

[Bug 488398] ghostscript files referred to outdated font info

2009-05-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488398 --- Comment #11 from Hin-Tak Leung ht...@users.sourceforge.net 2009-05-06 06:46:00 EDT --- Created an attachment

[Bug 499357] New: [kn_IN][Pango] GSUB U+0CA4 U+0CCD U+0CB0 has error

2009-05-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [kn_IN][Pango] GSUB U+0CA4 U+0CCD U+0CB0 has error https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499357 Summary: [kn_IN][Pango] GSUB U+0CA4 U+0CCD U+0CB0 has

[Bug 499360] New: [as_IN] [Codepoint- Additional Vowels] U+09E3 has error.

2009-05-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [as_IN] [Codepoint- Additional Vowels] U+09E3 has error. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499360 Summary: [as_IN] [Codepoint- Additional Vowels]

[Bug 499358] New: [as_IN] [Codepoint- Additional Vowels] U+09E2 has error.

2009-05-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [as_IN] [Codepoint- Additional Vowels] U+09E2 has error. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499358 Summary: [as_IN] [Codepoint- Additional Vowels]

[Bug 491530] Review Request: chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts - Decorative/LED sans-serif font

2009-05-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491530 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 491530] Review Request: chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts - Decorative/LED sans-serif font

2009-05-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491530 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome

2009-05-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome

2009-05-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #37 from Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com 2009-05-06 20:07:02 EDT --- pa-in is fine. I'll think about this

[Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome

2009-05-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #38 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-05-06 20:29:13 EDT --- So pa_IN.orth should be renamed to

[Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome

2009-05-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #39 from Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com 2009-05-06 20:35:34 EDT --- No. Either Qt patched to use pa-in

[Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome

2009-05-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #40 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org 2009-05-06 20:43:28 EDT --- Maybe renaming it back in fontconfig

[Bug 499345] [kn_IN][Pango] GSUB U+0CB0 U+200D U+0CCD U+0C95 font has error.

2009-05-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499345 --- Comment #3 from koka xiong kxi...@redhat.com 2009-05-06 21:55:37 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=342755) --

[Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome

2009-05-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #41 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org 2009-05-06 21:59:37 EDT --- FYI, Qt 3 appears not affected, no

[Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome

2009-05-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #42 from Parag pnem...@redhat.com 2009-05-06 23:27:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #39) No. Either Qt patched

[Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome

2009-05-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #43 from Parag pnem...@redhat.com 2009-05-06 23:34:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #42) (In reply to comment

[Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome

2009-05-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #44 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org 2009-05-07 00:04:13 EDT --- Patched qt here (4.5.0-15.fc11):

[Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome

2009-05-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #47 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org 2009-05-07 00:23:37 EDT --- I submitted a qt-4.5.1-3.fc11.1 build

[Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome

2009-05-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #48 from A S Alam aa...@redhat.com 2009-05-07 00:54:45 EDT --- Bug fixed with 4.5.0-15.fc11 package. Thanks --

[Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome

2009-05-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #49 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org 2009-05-07 01:22:34 EDT --- Tag request for qt-4.5.0-15.fc11

[Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome

2009-05-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #50 from A S Alam aa...@redhat.com 2009-05-07 01:29:59 EDT --- fontconfig (which is build by than) need to

[Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome

2009-05-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #52 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org 2009-05-07 01:47:27 EDT --- Re comment #50: I'm not sure I

[Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome

2009-05-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added