Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512
--- Comment #61 from Magne Andersson 2009-08-18 12:54:28
PDT ---
Will this make it in for 1.9.2, or is it for a later version?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512
--- Comment #60 from David Baron [:dbaron] 2009-01-29
15:46:23 PST ---
OK, I landed those pieces:
http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/cbcf14ce64cc
http://hg.mozilla.org/m
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512
--- Comment #59 from David Baron [:dbaron] 2009-01-28
11:17:17 PST ---
(In reply to comment #58)
> Document or PR_STATIC_ASSERT that WIDER needs to be > ULTRA_EXPANDED -
> ULTR
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512
Boris Zbarsky (:bz) (todo: 175+ items) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512
Vladimir Vukicevic (:vlad) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512
Vladimir Vukicevic (:vlad) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512
David Baron [:dbaron] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #3384
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512
David Baron [:dbaron] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #3581
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512
David Baron [:dbaron] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512
Bug 3512 depends on bug 437356, which changed state.
Bug 437356 Summary: set up shared font entry object
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=437356
What|Old
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512
Robert O'Callahan (:roc) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512
John Daggett (:jtd) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512
Greg Kolanek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512
Nicolas Mailhot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512
--- Comment #52 from Zack Weinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-06-04 21:46:22 PDT
---
(In reply to comment #51)
> I'm not sure I agree with how you are interpreting the spec though
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512
--- Comment #51 from John Daggett (:jtd) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-06-04
21:09:03 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #50)
I totally agree that wider/narrower should work the same as bo
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512
--- Comment #50 from Zack Weinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-06-04 19:05:33 PDT
---
I am reading between the lines of http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-fonts/#font-stretch
a bit, but I w
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512
--- Comment #49 from John Daggett (:jtd) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-06-04
18:57:30 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #48)
Hmmm, what spec defines this? Are you using the wording for
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512
--- Comment #48 from Zack Weinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-06-04 17:30:58 PDT
---
The problem with a single-number coding scheme like "501 = normal + 1 step
(wider/bolder)" is
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512
--- Comment #47 from David Baron [:dbaron] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-06-04
17:29:17 PDT ---
This patch does a similar encoding to font-weight; that's actually broken when
bolder
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512
--- Comment #46 from John Daggett (:jtd) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-06-04
17:23:10 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #43)
> So, for what it's worth, the patch here has the same issue w
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512
Damon Sicore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512
--- Comment #44 from Zack Weinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-06-04 14:56:44 PDT
---
There are nine base font-stretches, just as there are nine base font-weights.
Thus, how about
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512
David Baron [:dbaron] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512
--- Comment #42 from Stuart Parmenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-04-06 23:29:38
PDT ---
Created an attachment (id=314023)
--> (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=3140
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512
David Baron [:dbaron] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512
--- Comment #40 from David Baron [:dbaron] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-04-03
22:26:16 PDT ---
Created an attachment (id=313538)
--> (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512
John Daggett (:jtd) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512
John Daggett (:jtd) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512
John Daggett (:jtd) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512
--- Comment #38 from David Baron [:dbaron] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-03-07
14:16:16 PST ---
Discussion about whether we should implement a temporary hack to allow these
fonts to
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512
--- Comment #37 from Bob T. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-03-07 12:01:51 PST ---
Nicolas and I have disagreed about some simple short-term fixes for this on the
Linux platform (which
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512
--- Comment #36 from Nicolas Mailhot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-03-07 05:25:42
PST ---
I'm going to try to reword and summarise the problem there.
1. When software was young font
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512
--- Comment #35 from Felix Miata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-03-06 10:32:04 PST
---
(In reply to comment #33)
> (In reply to comment #32)
> > If web authors could specify it in a f
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512
Nicolas Mailhot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512
Nicolas Mailhot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512
--- Comment #32 from Bob T. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-03-05 04:37:14 PST ---
So maybe font-stretch is a red herring. Surely the failure of Firefox on Linux
to recognize Nimbus Sa
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512
--- Comment #31 from David Baron [:dbaron] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-03-04
22:08:03 PST ---
The question is whether font-stretch is more like font-style (normal / oblique
/ itali
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512
--- Comment #30 from Bob T. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-03-04 17:54:18 PST ---
"this needs to apply per family" Why? The web designer simply wants to
specify, say, a condensed san
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512
--- Comment #29 from Unknown W. Brackets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-03-04
17:24:13 PST ---
(In reply to comment #28)
> This "bug" (really a feature-request) has been around for 9
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512
Bob T. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512
Nicolas Mailhot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
42 matches
Mail list logo
