[Bug 482993] Renaming review: doulos-fonts to sil-doulos-fonts

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482993 Roozbeh Pournader rooz...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 477335] doulos-fonts: convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477335 Roozbeh Pournader rooz...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 482993] New: Renaming review: gentium-fonts to sil-gentium-fonts

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Renaming review: gentium-fonts to sil-gentium-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482993 Summary: Renaming review: gentium-fonts to

[Issue 98139] Interaction of font-fallback and font-replacement table

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=98139 User pl changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Bug 480443 depends on bug 480479, which changed state. Bug 480479 Summary: [wormux] Adapt to font package renamings

[Bug 480479] [wormux] Adapt to font package renamings

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480479 Wart w...@kobold.org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 480464] [neverball] Adapt to font package renamings

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480464 Wart w...@kobold.org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Bug 480443 depends on bug 480464, which changed state. Bug 480464 Summary: [neverball] Adapt to font package renamings

[Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477432, which changed state. Bug 477432 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

[Bug 477432] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477432 Wart w...@kobold.org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 480464] [neverball] Adapt to font package renamings

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480464 --- Comment #5 from Wart w...@kobold.org 2009-01-29 13:33:08 EDT --- If you can give me the dejavu font file name I should

[Bug 480464] [neverball] Adapt to font package renamings

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480464 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-29 14:11:49 EDT ---

[Bug 483115] Review Request: allgeyer-fonts - Musical Notation True Type Fonts

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483115 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 483115] Review Request: allgeyer-fonts - Musical Notation True Type Fonts

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483115 Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 482985] Renaming review: gentium-fonts to sil-gentium-fonts

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482985 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-29 16:39:42 EDT --- Also the following entries in

[Bug 482985] Renaming review: gentium-fonts to sil-gentium-fonts

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482985 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 480878] fc-cache says that it writes to /var/tmp/${localstatedir}/cache/${PACKAGE} and it does - literally

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480878 Michal Jaegermann mic...@harddata.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 482993] Renaming review: doulos-fonts to sil-doulos-fonts

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482993 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 477383] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477383 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-29 17:40:10 EDT --- (17:03:02) nphilipp: I'm

[Bug 481501] Review Request: dustin-domestic-manners - Handwriting font

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481501 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 481409] Review Request: chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts - A stylized font

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481409 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-01-29 18:03:55 EDT ---

[Bug 481501] Review Request: dustin-domestic-manners - Handwriting font

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481501 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-01-29 18:02:49 EDT ---

[Bug 481409] Review Request: chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts - A stylized font

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481409 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 481409] Review Request: chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts - A stylized font

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481409 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-01-29 18:07:28 EDT ---

[Bug 481484] Review Request: sj-fonts - Two fonts by Steve Jordi

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481484 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-01-29 18:10:53 EDT --- sj-fonts-2.0.2-1.fc10 has

[Bug 481484] Review Request: sj-fonts - Two fonts by Steve Jordi

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481484 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 3512] Implement font-stretch property

Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512 --- Comment #60 from David Baron [:dbaron] dba...@dbaron.org 2009-01-29 15:46:23 PST --- OK, I landed those pieces: http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/cbcf14ce64cc

[Bug 477465] Please convert thaifonts-scalable to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477465 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 475743] Many chinese glyphs on Japanese environment

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 Caius kaio Chance ccha...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 475743] Many chinese glyphs on Japanese environment

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 Caius kaio Chance ccha...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 475743] Many chinese glyphs on Japanese environment

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #13 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-01-29 20:32:39 EDT --- The Japanese problem seems to be with

rpms/gentium-fonts/devel dead.package, NONE, 1.1 Makefile, 1.1, NONE gentium-fonts.spec, 1.5, NONE sources, 1.2, NONE

Author: roozbeh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gentium-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv22232 Added Files: dead.package Removed Files: Makefile gentium-fonts.spec sources Log Message: Package being renamed to sil-gentium-fonts. --- NEW FILE

rpms/gentium-fonts/devel .cvsignore,1.2,NONE

Author: roozbeh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gentium-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv22634 Removed Files: .cvsignore Log Message: Package being renamed to sil-gentium-fonts. --- .cvsignore DELETED --- ___

[Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 Roozbeh Pournader rooz...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 482985] Renaming review: gentium-fonts to sil-gentium-fonts

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482985 Roozbeh Pournader rooz...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added

rpms/doulos-fonts/devel dead.package, 1.2, 1.3 .cvsignore, 1.7, NONE Makefile, 1.3, NONE doulos-fonts.spec, 1.7, NONE sources, 1.7, NONE

Author: roozbeh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/doulos-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv28865 Added Files: dead.package Removed Files: .cvsignore Makefile doulos-fonts.spec sources Log Message: doulos-fonts is getting renamed to sil-doulos-fonts

[Bug 477479] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477479 --- Comment #7 from Akira TAGOH ta...@redhat.com 2009-01-29 21:20:25 EDT --- I'm still trying to have a better name for

[Bug 482993] Renaming review: doulos-fonts to sil-doulos-fonts

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482993 Roozbeh Pournader rooz...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 477465] [thaifonts-scalable] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477465 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 --- Comment #21 from Rahul Bhalerao rbhal...@redhat.com 2009-01-29 23:59:33 EDT --- I used the general name because there

[Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) [renamed to cjkuni-fonts]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 477397] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477397 --- Comment #18 from Adam Goode a...@spicenitz.org 2009-01-30 00:45:52 EDT --- Would it be crazy to use FontForge at

[Bug 477397] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477397 --- Comment #19 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-30 01:40:33 EDT --- looks crazy to me but you can

[Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 --- Comment #22 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-30 01:39:48 EDT --- If you look at rawhide you'll

[Bug 482985] Renaming review: gentium-fonts to sil-gentium-fonts

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482985 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 482993] Renaming review: doulos-fonts to sil-doulos-fonts

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482993 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 477479] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477479 --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-30 01:45:54 EDT --- 1. if you have different font

[Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #16 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-01-30 02:55:01 EDT --- Thanks fixes the Japanese desktop

Fwd: Introduction

Sorry, the message was sent only to Nicolas instead of the whole list. Gmail is killing me -_- -- Forwarded message -- From: Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) boche...@fedoraproject.org Date: Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 11:51 AM Subject: Re: Introduction To: Nicolas Mailhot

[Fwd: Re: Needing advice on choosing a font]

Le Jeu 29 janvier 2009 11:32, Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) a écrit : On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 9:53 PM, Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote: http://nowacki.strefa.pl/torunska-e.html It's on the wishlist BTW That's a really nice way to ask for me to package a new font ^_^ If

Packaging questions

Hey, I'm currently reading all that packaging stuff and start working on my first font. I've chosen Tagesschrift from the wishlist, you can find the webiste here: http://www.yanone.de/typedesign/tagesschrift/ If I don't explain my problems well you can find my current status here:

Re: Packaging questions

Le jeudi 29 janvier 2009 à 15:30 -0300, Paul Lange a écrit : Hey, I'm currently reading all that packaging stuff and start working on my first font. I've chosen Tagesschrift from the wishlist, you can find the webiste here: http://www.yanone.de/typedesign/tagesschrift/ If I don't