tetex-fonts-hebrew has broken dependencies in the development tree:
On ppc:
tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew
On x86_64:
tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew
On i386:
tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484536
--- Comment #1 from Santhosh Thottingal santhosh.thottin...@gmail.com
2009-02-08 04:04:21 EDT ---
The following code
Author: nim
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv2029/devel
Modified Files:
dejavu-fonts.spec import.log
Log Message:
autoprovides
Index: dejavu-fonts.spec
===
If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at
the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text
at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=346419
pango | general | Ver:
Author: nim
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv5401/devel
Modified Files:
apanov-edrip-fonts.spec import.log
Log Message:
autoprovides
Index: apanov-edrip-fonts.spec
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480447
Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443
Bug 480443 depends on bug 480447, which changed state.
Bug 480447 Summary: [e16-docs] Adapt to font package renamings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480446
Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443
Bug 480443 depends on bug 480446, which changed state.
Bug 480446 Summary: [e16] Adapt to font package renamings
Author: kevin
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/devel
In directory
cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/home/fedora/kevin/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsD30918/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/devel
Log Message:
Directory /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/devel added to the repository
Author: kevin
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts
In directory
cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/home/fedora/kevin/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsD30918/rpms/vlgothic-fonts
Log Message:
Directory /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts added to the repository
___
Author: kevin
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts
In directory
cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/home/fedora/kevin/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsD30918/rpms/vlgothic-fonts
Added Files:
Makefile
Log Message:
Setup of module vlgothic-fonts
--- NEW FILE Makefile ---
# Top level Makefile for module
Author: kevin
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/devel
In directory
cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/home/fedora/kevin/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsD30918/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/devel
Added Files:
.cvsignore Makefile sources
Log Message:
Setup of module vlgothic-fonts
--- NEW FILE .cvsignore ---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484042
Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459
Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459
Qianqian Fang fan...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480470
--- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-02-09 00:34:53
EDT ---
This is almost done thanks to kind
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459
--- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-02-09 01:37:59
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
I am not
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484536
Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Le Sam 7 février 2009 09:55, Rahul Sundaram a écrit :
Stephen Carter wrote:
Greetings,
I just had a quick question: If I happen to stumble across a new
font
that isn't packaged yet, and isn't on the wishlist, would it be
alright
if I packaged it up? Or should just focus on stuff in the
Am Freitag, den 06.02.2009, 12:03 -0300 schrieb Paul Lange:
I'm not sure that:
the width and style is reminiscent of Luxi Sans, Lucida Sans, Tahoma,
and Andale Sans UI is sufficient to mark the font as a valid substitute
for those fonts. So far we've only marked this way fonts that were
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I am currently maintaining Liberation Fonts project. As most of the bugs
that I received were in regard to hinting defects, I would like to ask
about info of font hinting.
As you might heard of, Liberation Fonts were shipped from commercial
22 matches
Mail list logo
