Re: Fedora 11 font package changes proposal (renames, splits, etc)

2008-11-10 Thread Bill Nottingham
Nicolas Mailhot ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > > This sounds like severe overkill. If they want different scripts, why > > not just adjust their fontconfig configuration? Realistically, I can't > > think of an example where we'd want to ship dejavu for one script but > > not another. Do you have one?

Re: Fedora 11 font package changes proposal (renames, splits, etc)

2008-11-10 Thread Bill Nottingham
Nicolas Mailhot ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > ▶ package splits, to offer more flexibility to spin groups and fedora > users ... > ▶ help spins and users > > Wanting serif from dejavu, mono from liberation, and sans from tiresias, > without dragging in all the other dejavu/liberation/tiresias fonts

Re: pruning the fonts list

2008-04-22 Thread Bill Nottingham
Bill Nottingham ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > When looking over the LiveCD manifest, and where space is going, I > can't help but notice that a lot of it goes to fonts. Here's the > full list, AFAICT. The number to the left is the size of the package. > I think a good chunk o

Re: pruning the fonts list

2008-04-18 Thread Bill Nottingham
Jeremy Katz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 15:57 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > When looking over the LiveCD manifest, and where space is going, I > > can't help but notice that a lot of it goes to fonts. Here's the > > full list, AFAICT. The

pruning the fonts list

2008-04-18 Thread Bill Nottingham
When looking over the LiveCD manifest, and where space is going, I can't help but notice that a lot of it goes to fonts. Here's the full list, AFAICT. The number to the left is the size of the package. I think a good chunk of this could be pruned. 1) Fonts not used by any fontconfig app. I don't