Re: Packaging questions

2009-01-31 Thread Paul Lange
Am Samstag, den 31.01.2009, 09:43 +0100 schrieb Nicolas Mailhot: Le vendredi 30 janvier 2009 à 20:28 -0300, Paul Lange a écrit : Hey, thank you for your fast answer! np I created a Review request for my package. You find it here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483363

Re: Packaging questions

2009-01-31 Thread Paul Lange
Am Samstag, den 31.01.2009, 17:36 +0100 schrieb Nicolas Mailhot: Le samedi 31 janvier 2009 à 12:34 -0300, Paul Lange a écrit : Well, created an archive for it. You should not :p Oh, misunderstood you but it's clear now. %setup has all kinds of magic switches to deal with stuff in

Re: Packaging questions

2009-01-30 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le vendredi 30 janvier 2009 à 12:09 -0300, Paul Lange a écrit : OK, changed this. FontForge also says the version is 1.0 should I use this or the release date like now? As the documentation says never use 1.0 unless your 100% sure the next release will be named 1.1 and not 1.0 again but

Re: Packaging questions

2009-01-30 Thread Paul Lange
Am Freitag, den 30.01.2009, 19:04 +0100 schrieb Nicolas Mailhot: Le vendredi 30 janvier 2009 à 12:09 -0300, Paul Lange a écrit : OK, changed this. FontForge also says the version is 1.0 should I use this or the release date like now? As the documentation says never use 1.0 unless your

Packaging questions

2009-01-29 Thread Paul Lange
Hey, I'm currently reading all that packaging stuff and start working on my first font. I've chosen Tagesschrift from the wishlist, you can find the webiste here: http://www.yanone.de/typedesign/tagesschrift/ If I don't explain my problems well you can find my current status here:

Re: Packaging questions

2009-01-29 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le jeudi 29 janvier 2009 à 15:30 -0300, Paul Lange a écrit : Hey, I'm currently reading all that packaging stuff and start working on my first font. I've chosen Tagesschrift from the wishlist, you can find the webiste here: http://www.yanone.de/typedesign/tagesschrift/ If I don't