Le Jeu 24 juillet 2008 01:11, Dave Crossland a écrit :
2008/7/23 Martin-Gomez Pablo [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
So we need to add a suffix to the name but I'm not imaginative for
finding a good suffix (maybe iced as Nicolas propose), anyone of
you have an lightning idea ?
Why not use a build of FF
Hi,
We do not require fonts to be built from source. We ask packagers to
build font from sources when those sources are available unless they
have a very good reason not to.
However once upon a time, we didn't require fonts to be modifiable.
When enough modifiable fonts became available policy
2008/7/24 Vasile Gaburici [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
non-free tools like FontLab ... free-beer tools like Adobe FDK
That a proprietary program is distributed at zero price is not
important; that it is proprietary is what matters :-)
I think we'll try to bump the fontforge version in fedora-devel to
don't insist the name should be changed entirely,
adding a suffix (say, Old Standard FC) would be sufficient and even
preferrable.
The reason is that I could not update the source package on my site for
more than a year (instead I was spending my efforts improving FontForge
itself
2008/7/23 Martin-Gomez Pablo [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
So we need to add a suffix to the name but I'm not imaginative for
finding a good suffix (maybe iced as Nicolas propose), anyone of you
have an lightning idea ?
Why not use a build of FF from the same time the source files were published?
--
