Am Freitag, den 06.02.2009, 12:03 -0300 schrieb Paul Lange:
I'm not sure that:
the width and style is reminiscent of Luxi Sans, Lucida Sans, Tahoma,
and Andale Sans UI is sufficient to mark the font as a valid substitute
for those fonts. So far we've only marked this way fonts that were
I'm not sure that:
the width and style is reminiscent of Luxi Sans, Lucida Sans, Tahoma,
and Andale Sans UI is sufficient to mark the font as a valid substitute
for those fonts. So far we've only marked this way fonts that were
clearly derivatives of other fonts, or that claimed same (not
