http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18470
Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139
--- Comment #31 from Muayyad Alsadi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-11 10:25:13
EDT ---
Unfortunately you have to be a packager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184
--- Comment #18 from Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-11 16:35:22
EDT ---
BTW it worked once. Could not reproduce
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184
--- Comment #17 from Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-11 16:34:06
EDT ---
$ firefox -g
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184
--- Comment #13 from Mark Wielaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-11 09:31:00 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #12)
I'd love to
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184
--- Comment #19 from Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-11 16:39:51
EDT ---
And with codestyle:
$ firefox -g
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184
--- Comment #12 from Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-11 09:21:48
EDT ---
Well, it still fails
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184
--- Comment #21 from Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-11 17:06:40
EDT ---
and codestyle:
$ firefox -g
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184
--- Comment #20 from Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-11 17:06:06
EDT ---
And with even more debuginfo packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184
--- Comment #22 from Mark Wielaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-11 17:15:04 EDT
---
OK, this might be a clue:
#8
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184
--- Comment #14 from Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-11 10:27:41
EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=323178)
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184
--- Comment #23 from Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-11 17:57:38
EDT ---
Does not change a thing
Visibone:
$
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184
--- Comment #24 from Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-11 17:58:01
EDT ---
Codestyle:
$ firefox -g
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139
--- Comment #32 from Jens Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-11 18:22:44 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #31)
till I get
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457281
Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823
--- Comment #9 from Akira TAGOH [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-11 22:47:04 EDT ---
Sorry, my bad. it works after changing:
test
Author: mclasen
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/pango/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv11688
Modified Files:
.cvsignore pango.spec sources
Log Message:
1.22.2
Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823
--- Comment #10 from Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 02:13:19
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #9)
Sorry, my
Le lundi 10 novembre 2008 à 18:58 -0500, Jens Petersen a écrit :
Actually we have 57 since Behdad requested FersiWeb fonts and no one
I should not be that hard really to generate a script to generate a
skeleton spec file for any given font .
I know some packaging people frown on automated
Le lundi 10 novembre 2008 à 17:17 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit :
To proof it some more I've separated the common macro, spec templates
and directory definitions in a separate package, then modified three
font packages to use it:
— dejavu: multiple font families, multiple fontconfig files,
Jens Petersen wrote:
Thanks Máirín,
Just filed a new wishlist font:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Beteckna_fonts
Cool - it would be even better to file for a package review. :)
Not ready for that yet, though.
~m
___
Fedora-fonts-list mailing
21 matches
Mail list logo
