Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184
--- Comment #26 from Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-13 14:50:12
EDT ---
$ firefox -g
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467982
Andy Lindeberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184
--- Comment #27 from Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-13 17:00:10
EDT ---
After many more tests it seems the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823
--- Comment #14 from Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-13 17:01:21
EDT ---
(22:32:08) nim-nim: tagoh3: your first
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823
--- Comment #15 from Akira TAGOH [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-13 21:01:19 EDT
---
Doh! I should have a look carefully more..
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: FontForge Abort Opening some .otf files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471538
Summary: FontForge Abort Opening some .otf files
Product:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471538
--- Comment #2 from Víctor Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-14 01:52:33 EDT
---
Created an attachment (id=323540)
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471538
--- Comment #1 from Víctor Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-14 01:51:13 EDT
---
Created an attachment (id=323539)
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Build fontforge with cairo, pango and spiro support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471542
Summary: Build fontforge with cairo, pango and spiro
Is there any difference between using iso and ISO in font names?
How can I tell whether font ISO-8859-1 is installed or not?
If iso-8859-1 is not installed (which seems to be the case since
email specifying that iso-8859-1 is used do not display all character
codes as glyphs (in mutt Mutt 1.5.18
Le Jeu 13 novembre 2008 15:26, Dave Feustel a écrit :
Is there any difference between using iso and ISO in font names?
How can I tell whether font ISO-8859-1 is installed or not?
ISO-8859-1 is not a font it's an encoding.
Depending on the software, different font systems will be used to
11 matches
Mail list logo