rpms/hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts/devel Makefile,1.1,1.2

2009-02-14 Thread Paul Lange
Author: palango Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv17519/devel Modified Files: Makefile Log Message: change devel/Makefile to new cvs name Index: Makefile

rpms/hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts/devel hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 hartke-aurulent-sans-mono-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 import

2009-02-14 Thread Paul Lange
hartke-aurulent-sans-mono-fonts-fontconfig.conf import.log Log Message: * Sat Feb 14 2009 Paul Lange pala...@gmx.de - 20070504-1 - initial import --- NEW FILE hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8? !DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM ../fonts.dtd fontconfig

Help with licensing questions

2009-02-10 Thread Paul Lange
Hey, I'm currently packaging up Aurulent Sans. (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Hartke_Aurulent_fonts ) At the moment there are only some compiled *.otf files available. Because of this I asked the author for sources to compile from. But the answer is going a bit over my current horizon. The

Re: fontconfig questions

2009-02-08 Thread Paul Lange
Am Freitag, den 06.02.2009, 12:03 -0300 schrieb Paul Lange: I'm not sure that: the width and style is reminiscent of Luxi Sans, Lucida Sans, Tahoma, and Andale Sans UI is sufficient to mark the font as a valid substitute for those fonts. So far we've only marked this way fonts that were

Re: fontconfig questions

2009-02-06 Thread Paul Lange
I'm not sure that: the width and style is reminiscent of Luxi Sans, Lucida Sans, Tahoma, and Andale Sans UI is sufficient to mark the font as a valid substitute for those fonts. So far we've only marked this way fonts that were clearly derivatives of other fonts, or that claimed same (not

rpms/vollkorn-fonts/devel .cvsignore, 1.2, 1.3 sources, 1.2, 1.3 vollkorn.otf, 1.1, NONE

2009-02-02 Thread Paul Lange
Author: palango Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vollkorn-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv3578 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Removed Files: vollkorn.otf Log Message: removed vollkorn.otf from cvs repository Index: .cvsignore

rpms/vollkorn-fonts/devel vollkorn-fonts.spec,1.1,1.2

2009-02-02 Thread Paul Lange
}-fonts Version:1.008 -Release:1%{?dist} +Release:2%{?dist} Summary:A serif latin font with good readability Group: User Interface/X @@ -61,5 +61,8 @@ %changelog +* Mon Feb 02 2009 Paul Lange pala...@gmx.de - 1.008-2 +move vollkorn.otf file out

rpms/yanone-tagesschrift-fonts/devel import.log, NONE, 1.1 yanone-tagesschrift-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 yanone-tagesschrift-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2

2009-02-01 Thread Paul Lange
Log Message: * Wed Jan 28 2009 Paul Lange pala...@gmx.de - 20050524-1 - initial packaging --- NEW FILE import.log --- yanone-tagesschrift-fonts-20050524-1_fc10:HEAD:yanone-tagesschrift-fonts-20050524-1.fc10.src.rpm:1233518597 --- NEW FILE yanone-tagesschrift-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- ?xml

[SPAM] rpms/vollkorn-fonts/devel import.log, NONE, 1.1 vollkorn-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 vollkorn-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 vollkorn.otf, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2

2009-02-01 Thread Paul Lange
Jan 30 2009 Paul Lange pala...@gmx.de - 1.008-1 - initial packaging --- NEW FILE import.log --- vollkorn-fonts-1_008-1_fc10:HEAD:vollkorn-fonts-1.008-1.fc10.src.rpm:1233526980 --- NEW FILE vollkorn-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8? !DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM

Finish Font Birth

2009-02-01 Thread Paul Lange
Hey, herewith I'm announcing the birth of two new fonts - vollkorn-fonts and yanone-tagesschrift-fonts - in the fedora universe. I want to thank anyone who helped me to do this (yes, I'm a bit proud of myself :p) As usual I have some more questions: - Comps integration: I'm going to register

Re: Packaging questions

2009-01-31 Thread Paul Lange
Am Samstag, den 31.01.2009, 09:43 +0100 schrieb Nicolas Mailhot: Le vendredi 30 janvier 2009 à 20:28 -0300, Paul Lange a écrit : Hey, thank you for your fast answer! np I created a Review request for my package. You find it here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483363

Re: Packaging questions

2009-01-31 Thread Paul Lange
Am Samstag, den 31.01.2009, 17:36 +0100 schrieb Nicolas Mailhot: Le samedi 31 janvier 2009 à 12:34 -0300, Paul Lange a écrit : Well, created an archive for it. You should not :p Oh, misunderstood you but it's clear now. %setup has all kinds of magic switches to deal with stuff

Re: Packaging questions

2009-01-30 Thread Paul Lange
Am Freitag, den 30.01.2009, 19:04 +0100 schrieb Nicolas Mailhot: Le vendredi 30 janvier 2009 à 12:09 -0300, Paul Lange a écrit : OK, changed this. FontForge also says the version is 1.0 should I use this or the release date like now? As the documentation says never use 1.0 unless your

Packaging questions

2009-01-29 Thread Paul Lange
Hey, I'm currently reading all that packaging stuff and start working on my first font. I've chosen Tagesschrift from the wishlist, you can find the webiste here: http://www.yanone.de/typedesign/tagesschrift/ If I don't explain my problems well you can find my current status here: