Re: Are we really going to require fonts to be built from sources by Fedora packagers? [Was: Re: Suffix for "Old Standard" ?]

2008-07-24 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le Jeu 24 juillet 2008 11:56, Dave Crossland a écrit : > > 2008/7/24 Vasile Gaburici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> I think we'll try to bump the fontforge version in fedora-devel to >>> the >>> latest available upstream just before F10 beta. And then rebuild >>> every >>> font depending on it. This wa

Re: Are we really going to require fonts to be built from sources by Fedora packagers? [Was: Re: Suffix for "Old Standard" ?]

2008-07-24 Thread Dave Crossland
2008/7/24 Vasile Gaburici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > non-free tools like FontLab ... free-beer tools like Adobe FDK That a proprietary program is distributed at zero price is not important; that it is proprietary is what matters :-) >> I think we'll try to bump the fontforge version in fedora-devel

Re: Are we really going to require fonts to be built from sources by Fedora packagers? [Was: Re: Suffix for "Old Standard" ?]

2008-07-24 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Hi, We do not "require" fonts to be built from source. We ask packagers to build font from sources when those sources are available unless they have a very good reason not to. However once upon a time, we didn't require fonts to be modifiable. When enough modifiable fonts became available policy

Are we really going to require fonts to be built from sources by Fedora packagers? [Was: Re: Suffix for "Old Standard" ?]

2008-07-24 Thread Vasile Gaburici
Here are some troublesome points: - Free font authors may well use non-free tools like FontLab to write them. E.g., the recent variants of Liberation Sans by Gustavo Ferreira. - Free fonts may have a source that requires free-beer tools to produce, like Adobe FDK, e.g. the TeX Gyre fonts: http://w